- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Derek Chauvin seriously injured in knife attack in prison
Posted on 11/26/23 at 11:23 am to NC_Tigah
Posted on 11/26/23 at 11:23 am to NC_Tigah
quote:
His assertion that a healthy person would have died just as Floyd did is an example of either abject speculative stupidity, or a lie in search of a directed outcome
Exactly.
quote:
George Floyd’s heart disease and use of fentanyl were contributing factors to his death
0
Posted on 11/26/23 at 11:24 am to TigerIn2023
quote:
says the user repeatedly stating “Chief medical examiner for the state of Maryland” without offering his name or any of his relevant testimony.
Lol. Which I did to illuminate how ridiculous your appeal to authority was.
Posted on 11/26/23 at 11:24 am to jimmy the leg
quote:
Paid by the family.
WHOOPSIES!
quote:
He said he had asked not to be paid when prosecutors asked if he would testify in the case.
Posted on 11/26/23 at 11:25 am to the808bass
Can’t help you there.
You can lead a horse to water…
You can lead a horse to water…
Posted on 11/26/23 at 11:26 am to TigerIn2023
quote:
He said he had asked not to be paid when prosecutors asked if he would testify in the case.
Fair enough, the family didn’t pay.
However, are you suggesting that he received no benefit from his testimony at all?
ETS - the “whoopsies” stuff is juvenile imho.
This post was edited on 11/26/23 at 11:27 am
Posted on 11/26/23 at 11:28 am to Robin Masters
quote:No, citing a medical expert isn't inherently an appeal to authority fallacy. It becomes fallacious if the authority's expertise isn't relevant to the topic at hand or if their opinion is taken as absolute truth without supporting evidence. However, relying on a qualified medical expert's opinion can often provide valuable information in discussions related to medical or health-related matters.
Which I did to illuminate how ridiculous your appeal to authority was.
So you repeatedly saying repeatedly stating “Chief medical examiner for the state of Maryland” without offering his name or any of his relevant testimony is an appeal to authority. Sorry sweetheart.
Did you find those other two experts yet? Or are you ready to concede you were wrong?
Posted on 11/26/23 at 11:28 am to TigerIn2023
quote:
if their opinion is taken as absolute truth without supporting evidence.
Lolzy.
Posted on 11/26/23 at 11:29 am to jimmy the leg
quote:
ETS - the “whoopsies” stuff is juvenile imho.
The user who literally called me a liar is now butthurt that I said “whoopsies”.
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL
Posted on 11/26/23 at 11:30 am to the808bass
Where’s your supporting evidence sir?
Posted on 11/26/23 at 11:31 am to TigerIn2023
You’re decompensating.
I’m enjoying it.
I’m enjoying it.
Posted on 11/26/23 at 11:31 am to TigerIn2023
quote:
So you repeatedly saying repeatedly stating “Chief medical examiner for the state of Maryland” without offering his name or any of his relevant testimony is an appeal to authority. Sorry sweetheart.
No shite. That was the point.
You are not a person of even average intelligence.
Posted on 11/26/23 at 11:32 am to TigerIn2023
quote:Despite my soft bigotry of low expectations here, you really aren't as bright as I gave you credit. My bad.
WHOOPSIES!
Posted on 11/26/23 at 11:39 am to Robin Masters
Why the need to resort to name calling? Are you getting frustrated sweetheart?
Posted on 11/26/23 at 11:39 am to TigerIn2023
quote:
Where’s your supporting evidence sir?
quote:
III. No life-threatening injuries identified A. No facial, oral mucosal, or conjunctival petechiae B. No injuries of anterior muscles of neck or laryngeal structures C. No scalp soft tissue, skull, or brain injuries D. No chest wall soft tissue injuries, rib fractures (other than a single rib fracture from CPR), vertebral column injuries, or visceral injuries E. Incision and subcutaneous dissection of posterior and lateral neck, shoulders, back, flanks, and buttocks negative for occult trauma
There’s my evidence.
It’s from your autopsy.
Posted on 11/26/23 at 11:40 am to TigerIn2023
quote:
Are you getting frustrated sweetheart?
I think everyone is frustrated that they they thought you were competent to argue.
Instead, we’ve found out that you’re a Google-copy-paste bitch.
Posted on 11/26/23 at 11:42 am to TigerIn2023
quote:
Why the need to resort to name calling? Are you getting frustrated sweetheart?
I didn’t call you a name. Thanks for continuing to prove my point though.
Posted on 11/26/23 at 11:43 am to the808bass
Are you referring to the report from the county medical investigator which concluded that it was a homicide due to “cardiopulmonary arrest” from “law enforcement subdual, restraint, and neck compression”?
Posted on 11/26/23 at 11:44 am to TigerIn2023
Yes. That’s the one.
You’re just trying to look stupid now.
You’re just trying to look stupid now.
Posted on 11/26/23 at 11:45 am to Robin Masters
quote:
You are not a person of even average intelligence.
quote:
I didn’t call you a name.
Ok.
Posted on 11/26/23 at 11:46 am to the808bass
Do you normal cite sources which arrive at a conclusion contrary to your own?
Page 31 of 41
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News