Dems: Would New York or California be as "moral" as Alabama?

LOL of course not. Especially since the Senate is so close.

quote:

---

Hypothetical melt

---

Who's melting?

I'd write in, wouldn't vote for the other guy. Seems like something like 20k people in AL (probably almost all traditional republicans) agree w that logic.

Probably not in NY.

Because the Dem will have most likely worked for Goldman or JPMorgan.


Wait dont even count mine, I forget anything outside of NYC even exists.

NY State would and I think New York City just wouldn't even show up

That said don't think the candidate would even last to the election and be forced to step down.

quote:

---

Talk all you want about how close the vote was. We just elected a democrat in a DEEP red state. Would those states do the same thing if the roles were reversed?

---

They would. And, unlike Republicans, they would insist a sitting senator in that situation resign. And, unlike Republicans, they'd never nominate such an obvious lunatic as Roy Moore in the first place.

Would they run someone as crazy as Moore?

Massachusetts elected a Republican just 8 years ago and the Dem wasn't even a child molester, just a crappy candidate

quote:

---

Massachusetts elected a Republican just 8 years ago and the Dem wasn't even a child molester, just a crappy candidate

---

Fair enough, but the question was in reference to New York or California. Deepest red vs deepest blue state(s). We showed what we will do. And of course, no credit given by a democrat in this thread, yet.

Add my home state of Massachusetts to the list. Ted Kennedy was responsible for a woman drowning and he swam away and didn't alert the authorities right away. The end result? A year later he ended up with 62% of the vote to hold his Senate seat. In Massachusetts it doesn't matter what you can do to help the state as long as you're a social liberal or are a Kennedy.