- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Dems already have their narrative
Posted on 7/25/25 at 8:36 pm to Central MS
Posted on 7/25/25 at 8:36 pm to Central MS
quote:
He knew and hung with Epsein a few years went back to NYC never contact since abstain in Florida some 15 years later.
Charges will not be filed against Trump. The only knew who Epstein was and never went beyond at Mira Lago, New York and ended in New York in Black.
Posted on 7/25/25 at 8:58 pm to Tigers0918
From the jump I have to question the credibility of the claim that “Trump’s name is in the files a bunch.” A CNN report citing a source close to the situation claiming a meeting occurred wherein Bondi told Trump his name is in there a bunch - that ain’t gonna do it for me. Are you aware of Trump himself or Bondi making that statement/assertion (name being in there a bunch) that I perhaps am unaware of? Help me give credibility to any of these claims about Trump.
As of this moment all I can do is speculate, which I am no fan of as a general practice, but if Im forced to speculate at this moment as to Trump’s name appearing in the files, given the lack of credible support for the claims floating around, Im going to randomly choose (which is essentially what everyone else is doing), I randomly choose 10. Trump’s name appears 10 times and a blind man could see it’s not in connection with any actual wrongdoing himself personally.
As of this moment all I can do is speculate, which I am no fan of as a general practice, but if Im forced to speculate at this moment as to Trump’s name appearing in the files, given the lack of credible support for the claims floating around, Im going to randomly choose (which is essentially what everyone else is doing), I randomly choose 10. Trump’s name appears 10 times and a blind man could see it’s not in connection with any actual wrongdoing himself personally.
Posted on 7/25/25 at 9:03 pm to Rattlehead82
Don’t really care if you think I’m lying about voting for him. I did and I would again against Clinton Biden or Harris. It’s a no brainer. Doesn’t mean I’m a dumbass who agrees with everything Trump does. He’s imperfect by a wide margin but still the best option
This post was edited on 7/25/25 at 9:25 pm
Posted on 7/25/25 at 9:04 pm to Central MS
See we hold all the cards now, we have access to whatever is out there and can script the narrative, Dems can do nothing... Even if the MSM does not play what we say or twist it, we can keep ramming it down their throats and people will catch on to how bad the Dems are, how bad Obama and Biden were for this country.
Posted on 7/25/25 at 9:08 pm to EastWestConnection
Come on man, use a comma. It's a brainer.
Posted on 7/25/25 at 9:11 pm to Tigers0918
Please share examples, sweetheart.
Posted on 7/25/25 at 9:11 pm to AURulz1
quote:.
Come on man, use a comma. It's a brainer.
My bad
Posted on 7/25/25 at 9:49 pm to davyjones
quote:
From the jump I have to question the credibility of the claim that “Trump’s name is in the files a bunch.
Nobody has questioned the fact that he was in there for his plane rides at a minimum. Is that now something that people are denying?
Posted on 7/25/25 at 10:00 pm to Tigers0918
You are just too ignorant to fix
Posted on 7/25/25 at 10:13 pm to Tigers0918
No, I don’t think it’s about denying something like that, but instead, at least to me, it’s a somewhat serious problem of certain folks being irresponsible and/or unscrupulous upon receiving that level and sort of information. In other words, even in the face of context surrounding such a mention(s) in the so-called Epstein files that unambiguously describes and/or implies a clear lack of improper or immoral or illegal conduct, these certain people will almost assuredly proceed anyway with the same depraved narratives that they’ve been pushing, even with no supporting evidence whatsoever, at that.
So IMO, bottom line point here in this post for me is that it’s quite difficult to trust them or take them seriously when certain folks say “Just release the files and if there’s nothing reflecting illicit activity on Trump’s part, then he’s got nothing to worry about.” They’ve sorta destroyed their own credibility given constant, nonstop attacks on Trump.
So IMO, bottom line point here in this post for me is that it’s quite difficult to trust them or take them seriously when certain folks say “Just release the files and if there’s nothing reflecting illicit activity on Trump’s part, then he’s got nothing to worry about.” They’ve sorta destroyed their own credibility given constant, nonstop attacks on Trump.
Posted on 7/25/25 at 10:32 pm to cajuntiger1010
quote:
The overton window shift to the right the last 5 years is remarkable
It shifted far left under Biden Kamala, so thankfully its correcting.
Posted on 7/25/25 at 11:05 pm to Tigers0918
So, Maxwell tells the truth that helps put liberal perverts in prision. She proves Trump had nothing to do with Epstein dirt and receives a pardon for puttining away a 100 pedophiles. Maga will be 100% behind this 
Posted on 7/25/25 at 11:13 pm to moontigr
Here’s how it could’ve gone down….four years ago when the Dems controlled everything Biden releases it all.
If Trump was guilty why’d they sit on that juicy tidbit all the way through a big 2024 loss?
If Trump was guilty why’d they sit on that juicy tidbit all the way through a big 2024 loss?
Popular
Back to top


0







