Started By
Message

re: Democrats REFUSE to cap Supreme Court to 9 Justices

Posted on 9/2/26 at 9:32 pm to
Posted by weagle1999
Member since May 2025
3850 posts
Posted on 9/2/26 at 9:32 pm to
quote:

What would even be the point of having 99 judges.


What is the point of having 9?

Why has Congress turned much if its authority over to the Judicial branch?
Posted by Tigersforthee
Member since Dec 2025
205 posts
Posted on 9/2/26 at 9:37 pm to
When Democrats say they hate America you should believe them.
Posted by bamadontcare
Member since Jun 2013
4290 posts
Posted on 9/2/26 at 9:48 pm to
quote:

think the USSC should be an even number of judges, for reasons that I have shared here. But regardless. Who says 9 is the magic number? Why not 99? There are hundreds of millions more people here now compared to when the US was founded.


I remember an internet around 2010-2011
when Democrats assured me that no SC Justice
had political views that influenced them.

When I tried to argue the point they shushed me.

Fast forward to now and really look at what
we have.

One appointment will destroy our Nation now.
Posted by B747Tiger
Member since Jul 2026
896 posts
Posted on 9/2/26 at 9:53 pm to
quote:

Why has Congress turned much if its authority over to the Judicial branch?


If anything they’ve ceded their authority to the executive.
Posted by novabill
Crossville, TN
Member since Sep 2005
10814 posts
Posted on 9/2/26 at 10:19 pm to
Maybe states need to do it
Posted by SDVTiger
Cabo San Lucas
Member since Nov 2011
100012 posts
Posted on 9/2/26 at 10:26 pm to
Did it not pass cause 7 R votes?
Posted by Kashmir
Member since Dec 2014
10403 posts
Posted on 9/2/26 at 10:36 pm to
quote:

We will look back to the traitorous Republicans refusing to blow up the filibuster and get shite done. It's my contention that had they done that and fixed shite by the time to pick another President people would see the positive changes


THIS!!!
Posted by wookalar1013
up ta camp
Member since Jun 2017
2615 posts
Posted on 9/3/26 at 1:36 am to
Thanks fren
I use Nigel Tufnel when making reservations
Posted by Hondo Blacksheep
Member since Jul 2022
3578 posts
Posted on 9/3/26 at 1:37 am to
That's not how CAs work.
Posted by BigTigerJoe
Member since Aug 2022
14525 posts
Posted on 9/3/26 at 2:16 am to
quote:

But regardless. Who says 9 is the magic number? Why not 99? There are hundreds of millions more people here now compared to when the US was founded.

quote:

Why not 2701 and they all vote by mail?

And, they are all foreigners.
Posted by Tarps99
Lafourche Parish
Member since Apr 2017
13473 posts
Posted on 9/3/26 at 2:32 am to
quote:

There are hundreds of millions more people here now compared to when the US was founded.


The real work of the US Court system is handled at the district level where there are over 650 district judges scattered across the US in major cities.

These judges are the ones to watch as they can go rogue and issue opinions that make you want to scratch your head and head to the nearest appellate court to review their actions. (See the judge that must be on speed dial to get to issue an injunction on the Trump administration) Some of them are ate up with TDS and others have the opposite of TDS.

The biggest hurdle in reforming bad judges is that they are appointed for life and have no recourse on any bad judicial decisions they make unless they break the law outside of their judicial purview. Then it would be up to the house to impeach and the senate to vote to convict.

Impeachment is simple a house majority vote, but all that an impeachment is like getting a write up at work you did something wrong. The Senate’s power to convict comes with the tall order of getting a 2/3 vote or 67 Senators to vote for conviction which is only a vote to remove them from power, and not criminally charging them with a crime.

Besides the issue of lifetime appointments and no major consequences for doing a poor job as a judge, the appointment process is just as bad with the Senate holding up appointments with blue slips stalling certain judges appointed by one party because a Senator in a blue state may not like a Trump appointed judge. While the no balls Republican Party senators will roll over to any Democratic appointed judge in a red state with little opposition.


Then you have the appellate court level where cases can be re evaluated and act like mini supreme courts where a group of judges will listen to the case and arguments and issue an opinion. Some cases are first heard by a committee of judges on the circuit and if either party disagrees with the opinion the case can be appealed to the full circuit panel for their opinion.

After the circuit court rules that is when the Supreme Court steps in to hear the same arguments and issue an opinion or ruling. That is usually final, but in this political climate, some judges even ignore the Supreme Court.
This post was edited on 9/3/26 at 2:43 am
Posted by BigTigerJoe
Member since Aug 2022
14525 posts
Posted on 9/3/26 at 3:08 am to
quote:

Maybe states need to do it

If the data I accessed is accurate:

As of 2026, there are 28 states in the United States that have Republican-controlled legislatures.

Going the way of a constitutional amendment, probably need 38 states to exceed the 75 % threshold to get anything passed.
Posted by LSUbest
Coastal Plain
Member since Aug 2007
17668 posts
Posted on 9/3/26 at 4:50 am to
Trump should do it now.

24 sounds like a good number.

And fire the ones that can't pass a basic biology test.
Posted by LSUbest
Coastal Plain
Member since Aug 2007
17668 posts
Posted on 9/3/26 at 6:04 am to
Republicans knew this would fail before they started it.

"We tried fellas"

But wait - the Best part is - Pedocrats will only need a majority to increase the size of the court....not 2/3 majority.

Damned rules they have to follow.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram