- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Democratic congresswoman dismisses pro-life colleagues as ‘sex-starved males’
Posted on 6/12/19 at 4:02 pm
Posted on 6/12/19 at 4:02 pm
LINK
During a House debate over abortion in relation to a major spending bill Wednesday, Rep. Norma Torres (D-Calif.) dismissed her pro-life GOP colleagues as "sex-starved males."
During House floor debate about portions of the fiscal year 2020 Health and Human Services spending bill. Rep. Ross Spano (R-Fla.) pointed out that the measure included language that would weaken pro-life protections, such as conscience protection rules for medical professionals opposed to performing abortions.
Torres subsequently dismissed Spano's concerns as sexist.
"Mr. Speaker," she said, "it is tiring to hear from so many sex-starved males on this floor talk about a women's right to choose," Torres said, addressing the chair.
As can be heard in the video, the statement drew immediate murmurs from the House chamber and prompted an offer from Rep. Rob Woodall (R-Ga.) for Torres to withdraw her statement, to which she acquiesced.
"Mr. Speaker, if it pleases my colleague on the other side, I will withdraw my statement about sex-starved males on the floor," Torres said.
Torres later "put it in different terms" and said that "It is tiring to be here, on this floor or in committee, as a woman, to continue to be counseled about" the types of "family planning conversations that, rightfully, I deserve to have with my own doctor."
During a House debate over abortion in relation to a major spending bill Wednesday, Rep. Norma Torres (D-Calif.) dismissed her pro-life GOP colleagues as "sex-starved males."
During House floor debate about portions of the fiscal year 2020 Health and Human Services spending bill. Rep. Ross Spano (R-Fla.) pointed out that the measure included language that would weaken pro-life protections, such as conscience protection rules for medical professionals opposed to performing abortions.
Torres subsequently dismissed Spano's concerns as sexist.
"Mr. Speaker," she said, "it is tiring to hear from so many sex-starved males on this floor talk about a women's right to choose," Torres said, addressing the chair.
As can be heard in the video, the statement drew immediate murmurs from the House chamber and prompted an offer from Rep. Rob Woodall (R-Ga.) for Torres to withdraw her statement, to which she acquiesced.
"Mr. Speaker, if it pleases my colleague on the other side, I will withdraw my statement about sex-starved males on the floor," Torres said.
Torres later "put it in different terms" and said that "It is tiring to be here, on this floor or in committee, as a woman, to continue to be counseled about" the types of "family planning conversations that, rightfully, I deserve to have with my own doctor."
6
Posted on 6/12/19 at 4:04 pm to Crimson Wraith
She has that face that only a daughter can kiss!
Posted on 6/12/19 at 4:04 pm to Crimson Wraith
So she thinks pregnant women allow pro life people to have more sex? Wtf? Abortion would mean no consequences. Hence more sex.
Posted on 6/12/19 at 4:09 pm to flyAU
quote:
So she thinks pregnant women allow pro life people to have more sex? Wtf? Abortion would mean no consequences. Hence more sex.
Yeah, that's about two logical steps too far for who we are dealing with here.
Posted on 6/12/19 at 4:11 pm to Crimson Wraith
The pro-life position will result in fewer transactional sexual relationships.
In other words, it will reduce the available amount of pussy.
The sexually starved would ordinarily be proposing more means of “family planning” including abortion.
This is a weird claim by a woman who is likely an idiot.
In other words, it will reduce the available amount of pussy.
The sexually starved would ordinarily be proposing more means of “family planning” including abortion.
This is a weird claim by a woman who is likely an idiot.
Posted on 6/12/19 at 4:17 pm to Crimson Wraith
Apparently only in the world of government are you allowed to say whatever the frick is on your tiny little mind and then "withdraw your statement".
Who knew? Apparently you can unsay what has already been said, and face no ramifications
Who knew? Apparently you can unsay what has already been said, and face no ramifications
Posted on 6/12/19 at 4:26 pm to TigerAxeOK
Annulment comes to mind.
Posted on 6/12/19 at 4:40 pm to MrLSU
We aren't that sex starved.
Posted on 6/12/19 at 4:42 pm to 88Wildcat
Reminds me of this dude for some reason.
Posted on 6/12/19 at 4:45 pm to Crimson Wraith
Does she not understand that we’re animals and are meant to breed. Not with her necessarily...
Posted on 6/12/19 at 5:19 pm to 88Wildcat
She looks so damn proud and happy in that picture.
Posted on 6/12/19 at 5:33 pm to Crimson Wraith
These people are subhuman
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News