- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Deal is reached!!!
Posted on 3/25/20 at 5:49 am to BourreTheDog
Posted on 3/25/20 at 5:49 am to BourreTheDog
Pretty sure you are dead wrong. Also:
Democrats added a provision to ban businesses owned by the president, vice president, members of Congress and the heads of federal executive departments from receiving loans or investments through the corporate liquidity program. The prohibition also applies to their children, spouses and in-laws.
Democrats added a provision to ban businesses owned by the president, vice president, members of Congress and the heads of federal executive departments from receiving loans or investments through the corporate liquidity program. The prohibition also applies to their children, spouses and in-laws.
This post was edited on 3/25/20 at 5:57 am
3
Posted on 3/25/20 at 5:50 am to Buckeye Jeaux
quote:
There were only 3 senators on the floor for the last couple hours. They said they had zero input into the bill that will be sprung on them in the morning - a half-hour before the vote.
The federal government is fricking broken
Posted on 3/25/20 at 5:53 am to SaintNation
The House can still screw us.
Posted on 3/25/20 at 6:06 am to SelaTiger
frick this deal... no reason to give people straight up checks without underlying conditions...
Why should someone who is making 65k and still employed and working get a check? Why should someone who makes 100k and is out of work not get one?
Give money to unemployment benefits and stabilizing national, critical industries.
Why should someone who is making 65k and still employed and working get a check? Why should someone who makes 100k and is out of work not get one?
Give money to unemployment benefits and stabilizing national, critical industries.
Posted on 3/25/20 at 6:08 am to YF12
quote:
God help anyone that signs up for the small business loan programs jumping the gun
They ram the entire fist of the federal government up your raw a-hole if you take that loan
That's what I've been telling people. Unless they relax the conventional mechanisms for SBA loans, this ain't gonna help much.
Posted on 3/25/20 at 6:12 am to Lsut81
quote:
frick this deal... no reason to give people straight up checks without underlying conditions...
Why should someone who is making 65k and still employed and working get a check? Why should someone who makes 100k and is out of work not get one?
Give money to unemployment benefits and stabilizing national, critical industries.
Also no reason to give Congress a raise and demand airlines publish carbon emissions and fund abortion on demand and throw some money at Howard University and regulate all public traded companies must have gender and racial diverse boards
Posted on 3/25/20 at 6:13 am to Chef Free Gold Bloom
quote:
Also no reason to give Congress a raise and demand airlines publish carbon emissions and fund abortion on demand and throw some money at Howard University and regulate all public traded companies must have gender and racial diverse boards
Agree 100...
frick Washington
Posted on 3/25/20 at 6:14 am to thingshavechanged
quote:
Democrats added a provision to ban businesses owned by the president, vice president, members of Congress and the heads of federal executive departments from receiving loans or investments through the corporate liquidity program.
Wait... so entities such as the Trump hotels, who are just as affected by this as Hilton or Mariott are unable to participate simply because... Trump?
Posted on 3/25/20 at 6:17 am to HailHailtoMichigan!
quote:
Pelosi got rolled again.
NOTHING she asked for is in the agreed upon bill. It's basically identical to the bill the senate was going to agree to over the weekend.
I hope you're right, but it is my understanding it still has to go back through the House. Do not put anything past Nances. She is a horrible person. So I hope it is this:
and not this:
Posted on 3/25/20 at 6:19 am to PhDoogan
Question for this that know... these direct paychecks, what are they base on?
Are they gross income on your W2 or are they based off AGI that is taxable at the end of the year after deductions?
Are they gross income on your W2 or are they based off AGI that is taxable at the end of the year after deductions?
Posted on 3/25/20 at 6:19 am to SaintNation
Socialism at it's finest. Dissapointed in Trump.
Posted on 3/25/20 at 6:20 am to Lsut81
I believe the original bill said 2018 W2.
Posted on 3/25/20 at 6:22 am to Lsut81
quote:
Why should someone who is making 65k and still employed and working get a check?
Because they’re actually contributing to the economy now and in some cases working with the public (which should basically be considered hazard pay) while tons of people are home sitting on their arse whether they want to or not.
Posted on 3/25/20 at 6:26 am to thingshavechanged
quote:
The poorest Americans (who are struggling the most)
This is the only change out of the ones you mentioned - and they weren't "omitted" they got smaller checks than others because they aren't losing as much as others. Those individuals almost all qualify for some sort of public benefit as well - Medicaid, Food Stamps, Child Care Assistance, rent/utility subsidies, etc...
They aren't "struggling the most" during this time because there really is no substantive change for those individuals.
Posted on 3/25/20 at 6:26 am to piggilicious
the dems will make sure that Planned Parenthood gets something out of this. Baby killing is a priority during this pandemic.
Posted on 3/25/20 at 6:26 am to SaintNation
Did it get passed so we can now find out what’s in it?
Posted on 3/25/20 at 6:27 am to TopFlightSecurity
quote:
Socialism at it's finest. Dissapointed in Trump.
Trump's number one priority is to protect the American citizens. He is doing that. How can you be disappointed in him for that?
Posted on 3/25/20 at 6:27 am to MFn GIMP
So---it went from $1 Trillion (McConell) to $2 Trillion with no changes? HA!
Posted on 3/25/20 at 6:27 am to piggilicious
quote:
Because they’re actually contributing to the economy now and in some cases working with the public (which should basically be considered hazard pay) while tons of people are home sitting on their arse whether they want to or not.
That’s a stupid reason... so they get a bonus, which they really don’t need and are going to spend on a new xbox or set of trucknuts?
If it’s about stimulating the economy, then you give same amount of money to everyone, regardless of income bc you want them to spend it. If you want to help the ones truly impacted, then you put all that money into unemployment benefits.
Posted on 3/25/20 at 6:29 am to thingshavechanged
quote:
So---it went from $1 Trillion (McConell) to $2 Trillion with no changes? HA!
There were changes, but none of Nancy's BS changes.
Page 4 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News