- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Daily reminder your President is senile
Posted on 6/5/17 at 10:22 am to UHTiger
Posted on 6/5/17 at 10:22 am to UHTiger
quote:
But circling back, neither side is innocent in this game. I cant say I blame the Dems if they play obstructionsit at this point given all that had gone in the past several years.
Agreed neither side is innocent.
Never said otherwise.
But you can EASILY look at the facts and see that this is unprecedented. I mean the Dems are actually refusing to negotiate on things they WANT just to obstruct Trump.
Just as a quick example, let's compare two SCOTUS nominations. Sotomayor and Gorsuch.
I think we can all agree that Sotomayor is further to the left than Gorsuch is to the right, but she was confirmed 68-31 with 8 Republicans voting yes.
Gorsuch had THREE Democrats support him, and two of those are barely Democrats.
THe others attacked the guy as being far right. I mean come on.
There are, of course, other examples.
Posted on 6/5/17 at 10:25 am to HeyHeyHogsAllTheWay
quote:
And of course even with a minority and doing away with the filibuster there are ways the Democrats can slow crawl the nominations, and they ARE doing it.
...
That just sounds like Congress.
Anyway, here's WaPo's tracking of nominations (sorry, I tried to find additional sources, but no one else seems to have it summed up nearly so succinctly):
LINK
Posted on 6/5/17 at 10:27 am to HeyHeyHogsAllTheWay
quote:
But you can EASILY look at the facts and see that this is unprecedented.
Uh, wasn't there an open seat on the Supreme Court for over a year?
It most assuredly is NOT "unprecedented". It's Washington on a Tuesday.
Posted on 6/5/17 at 10:34 am to Iosh
I'm confused why exactly did it take almost 3 months to get his deputy AG nominated that ended up being a 95-5 vote confirmation..?
A lot of his appointments took an unnecessarily long time to get appointed.
You are true in theory they can't filibuster but don't the nominees have to go through each committee approval as well? Which Dems are members of and can slow down.
Of course you could say well McConnell could just expedite the process but that wouldn't be very good PR wise.
A lot of his appointments took an unnecessarily long time to get appointed.
You are true in theory they can't filibuster but don't the nominees have to go through each committee approval as well? Which Dems are members of and can slow down.
Of course you could say well McConnell could just expedite the process but that wouldn't be very good PR wise.
Posted on 6/5/17 at 10:34 am to HeyHeyHogsAllTheWay
quote:Can we?
I think we can all agree that Sotomayor is further to the left than Gorsuch is to the right,
Posted on 6/5/17 at 10:38 am to HeyHeyHogsAllTheWay
Oh this is turrble.
Republicans resist/held up 400 obama lower court nominations in 2009.
Republicans resist/held up 400 obama lower court nominations in 2009.
Posted on 6/5/17 at 10:40 am to Iosh
Here is your daily reminder, that Hillary is still not President:


Posted on 6/5/17 at 10:47 am to Iosh
quote:
Daily reminder your President is senile
And what is the mental state of YOUR national leader? If POTUS is not your president then you are not an American by definition. 1+1 is really tough math for Libtard Dims we all know.
Whoever it is, POTUS is living rent free all up in their dome!
Feel free to GTFO of the USA and go back to your own part of the world if the USA is so horrible. And take your filthy dirty family with you.
Posted on 6/5/17 at 10:48 am to Vacherie Saint
quote:On what basis am I expected to agree?
Yes.
Jesus Christ, dude.
Posted on 6/5/17 at 10:49 am to Sidicous
quote:Nah I think I'll stay here and talk as much shite as I want. Freedom baby
Feel free to GTFO of the USA and go back to your own part of the world if the USA is so horrible. And take your filthy dirty family with you.
Posted on 6/5/17 at 10:51 am to Iosh
quote:
Iosh
Daily reminder of the ongoing denial by liberal progressives that they actually lost the election.
Posted on 6/5/17 at 11:14 am to Iosh
quote:
They're probably including people going through the internal vetting process*, because they've only submitted 5 to the Senate. *absolute loyalty oath
Don't you know?
They all have to be approved by Putin First
Posted on 6/5/17 at 11:16 am to Iosh
quote:
On what basis am I expected to agree?
How about reality?
You liberal pieces of shite crack me up. Personally I hope yall never change. I thoroughly enjoy the endless reminders that normal Americans have rejected your nonsense in election after election.
Posted on 6/5/17 at 11:20 am to the808bass
Wow. That's what you're going with? But Obama?
Posted on 6/5/17 at 11:22 am to HeyHeyHogsAllTheWay
quote:The reality where judicial decisions often don't map onto the left-right spectrum at all? Let alone quantifiable to the extent of calling one judge "more left" than another is "more right"?
How about reality?
This post was edited on 6/5/17 at 11:23 am
Posted on 6/5/17 at 11:22 am to Iosh
quote:
Daily reminder your President is senile
This plot was hatched about two weeks ago. LiberalMediaComplex will start pushing Trumps old age dementia, alzheimer's, and late night twitter somnambulism. Have fun sheeple.
Posted on 6/5/17 at 11:24 am to Elvis Parsley
quote:I was calling him senile in 2015
This plot was hatched about two weeks ago.
Posted on 6/5/17 at 11:27 am to Iosh
Says the guy who straight up said he prefers judges who fall more left than right awhile ago 
Posted on 6/5/17 at 11:29 am to Iosh
quote:
The reality where judicial decisions often don't map onto the left-right spectrum at all? Let alone quantifiable to the extent of calling one judge "more left" than another is "more right"?
Other, less stupid , people will note that I did not post "Sotomayor's rulings tend to be more to the left than Gorsuch's tend to be from the right"
Instead I merely pointed out that Sortamayor herself was more to the left than GOrsuch himself is to the right.
Words matter son, try using yours.
Popular
Back to top


2







