Started By
Message

re: Daily COVID Updated as of 11/2/20 8:00 PM

Posted on 7/28/20 at 5:44 pm to
Posted by AUMIS01
Atlanta
Member since May 2020
1206 posts
Posted on 7/28/20 at 5:44 pm to
Definitely a good day. Big testing drop WOW, but the positivity rate being down by 1.2% from WOW is huge.
Posted by HailHailtoMichigan!
Mission Viejo, CA
Member since Mar 2012
69264 posts
Posted on 7/28/20 at 5:44 pm to
Could be a blip, but positivity rate down fairly significantly
Posted by Mrtommorrow1987
Twilight Zone
Member since Feb 2008
13120 posts
Posted on 7/28/20 at 9:56 pm to
Wtf happened to the deaths today?
Posted by Chromdome35
NW Arkansas
Member since Nov 2010
6830 posts
Posted on 7/28/20 at 10:08 pm to
Last Tuesday had 1054 deaths, today had 1121, a 6.4% increase over last week.

Given the upward trend of deaths as they follow 2-3 weeks behind the case curve, I think today is about where it should be. I'm happy the number wasn't higher.

Posted by David_DJS
Member since Aug 2005
17865 posts
Posted on 7/28/20 at 11:26 pm to
quote:

Last Tuesday had 1054 deaths, today had 1121, a 6.4% increase over last week.

Given the upward trend of deaths as they follow 2-3 weeks behind the case curve, I think today is about where it should be. I'm happy the number wasn't higher.

I look in on this thread only now and then, so apologize if this has already been asked/answered.

The way you're reporting deaths, are you going by the count as reported on a particular day, or do your charts reflect deaths on the day they death was actually recorded?

To explain - I'll use Arizona for example. Something like half the deaths reported for AZ in July are from "death certificate matching," which means a) they're assumed COVID deaths (as opposed to tested/confirmed), and b) the death actually took place weeks ago ... as far back as March.

Thanks -
Posted by Chromdome35
NW Arkansas
Member since Nov 2010
6830 posts
Posted on 7/28/20 at 11:46 pm to
I believe that the data represents the count as reported on a particular day, your first premise.

I am not aware of any data source that shows the deaths adjusted to the actual date of death. Do you know of one?

I'm not the source of the data, I'm just downloading the dataset from the COVID Tracking Project daily and updating my sheet, so my stuff would be based on however their methodology works. WorldoMeter's number do differ some from the COVID Tracking Project, so every source is a bit different. Over time they all look the same graphically, no real difference.
This post was edited on 7/28/20 at 11:50 pm
Posted by David_DJS
Member since Aug 2005
17865 posts
Posted on 7/29/20 at 3:03 am to
Thanks for your reply.

I don’t know of an easy way to use what little real data is out there, but I’ll tell you way the state of AZ is doing. They release “daily stats” every morning that show the top line numbers - “1,834 confirmed cases and 133 COVID deaths” for example. But if you look at the charts they publish daily, the reported daily data is not reflected in them because they are going back and reclassifying deaths, and even in some cases COVID cases - do those “1,834 cases and 133 deaths” are found spread out o er an about 90 day period in the rear view mirror.

To graph accurately, you’d have to have their data file (they don’t post it) or scroll through their charts and note the deaths/cases by day, which of course is changing every day for all the days during the COVID period. And that’s before you deal with the non-COVID COVID deaths and double/triple counting cases.

It’s a mess, and probably by design. If they reported accurate data - “unique new cases and actual COVID deaths” on a daily basis, Arizona wouldn’t have gone through this so-called spike and second lockdown of certain businesses and gatherings.

I’m sure Arizona isn’t doing anything that’s not also being done in most other states, if not all of them. They’ve even figured out how to clown the hospitalization numbers.
Posted by DEG
Atlanta
Member since Jul 2009
10525 posts
Posted on 7/29/20 at 9:42 am to
I'm sure this has been addressed, but are there any models that include assumptions of people who have had the virus, but were never tested? The CDC estimates that number to be 6-24x known cases.
Posted by seawolf06
NH
Member since Oct 2007
8159 posts
Posted on 7/29/20 at 9:42 am to
Do you have a link to the WoM data website?
Posted by Chromdome35
NW Arkansas
Member since Nov 2010
6830 posts
Posted on 7/29/20 at 10:24 am to
Posted by Chromdome35
NW Arkansas
Member since Nov 2010
6830 posts
Posted on 7/29/20 at 3:48 pm to
I have been working on the sharing settings for the new State Dashboard tracker I am standing up. Please try to go to this link and let me know if it works.

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1TEcFHKYJF0PYkXp5PFOStPIQ-asvxfsq7DZrEsrM1W0/edit?usp=sharing
Posted by Chromdome35
NW Arkansas
Member since Nov 2010
6830 posts
Posted on 7/29/20 at 5:13 pm to
This is the link to the COVID-19 tracker that I have created and shared on Google Drive.
If you want to view the shared sheet, follow this link COVID-19 Tracker
If you want to download a copy of this sheet and manipulate it follow this link Downloadable COVID-19 Tracker
The source for the data is from https://covidtracking.com/data/















New Cases by State


New Deaths by State


7-day average growth rate of new cases
Posted by MeatCleaverWeaver
Member since Oct 2013
22175 posts
Posted on 7/29/20 at 8:55 pm to
Hope I’m not busting in here with a straight dumb A question, but, is there any general consensus as to what the mortality rate in the US is to date?
Posted by Matt225
St. George
Member since Dec 2019
851 posts
Posted on 7/29/20 at 8:58 pm to
I have issue with taken the data that is being released by test sites/hospitals/ state governments. The "books" have been proven time and time again to be largely inaccurate and sometimes just plain fraud.

Fuzzy Numbers at best.
Posted by Chromdome35
NW Arkansas
Member since Nov 2010
6830 posts
Posted on 7/29/20 at 9:25 pm to
As of today, the official mortality rate is 3.25%; however, I believe the real rate is around .55%
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
89488 posts
Posted on 7/29/20 at 9:29 pm to
quote:

I believe the real rate is around .55%


The trend line has been clearly dipping towards a "true" IFR of between about .35% to .75%. Your double nickel splits my range "guess" neatly in two.
This post was edited on 7/29/20 at 10:49 pm
Posted by baybeefeetz
Member since Sep 2009
31633 posts
Posted on 7/30/20 at 7:04 am to
Isn’t .55 pretty bad?
Posted by TigerDoc
Texas
Member since Apr 2004
9902 posts
Posted on 7/30/20 at 7:23 am to
It depends on how many people get it. If it takes 70% community infection to get to herd immunity, that would be the deaths of about 1.27 million (330 million x .7 x .0055). The 1918 flu outbreak killed about 650K as a point of historical comparison. You've got diseases that have small outbreaks like SARS, MERS, Ebola, that are more fatal on an IFR basis, but more easily suppressed. This one is tough because of presymptomatic/asymptomatic spread and fairly high R0. .55% is about 5.5x as fatal as typical flu.
This post was edited on 7/30/20 at 7:30 am
Posted by DougsMugs
Georgia
Member since Aug 2019
8239 posts
Posted on 7/30/20 at 7:55 am to
I still don't believe the low numbers coming out of New York. It is about as trust worthy as numbers from communist china.

There is an effort to rebuild Cuomo's pathetic image.
Posted by DMAN1968
Member since Apr 2019
10144 posts
Posted on 7/30/20 at 7:59 am to
Florida and Arizona are getting close to the same case/per1m pop numbers as New York and New Jersey. It will be interesting to see if the deaths and new cases follow them in a similar manner.
first pageprev pagePage 276 of 331Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram