Started By
Message

re: COVID was smeared all over Metro-NYC for weeks and weeks... 1/10 of 1% death rate?

Posted on 5/2/20 at 12:46 pm to
Posted by longwayfromLA
NYC
Member since Nov 2007
3331 posts
Posted on 5/2/20 at 12:46 pm to
quote:

1968 did not have a divided country with obvious agendas hating on Trump.


Now Trump wasn't a public figure at that point. But is it really your argument that the country was less divided in 1968? Nineteen Sixty-eight in the US? Really? That is a strong take...

Posted by longwayfromLA
NYC
Member since Nov 2007
3331 posts
Posted on 5/2/20 at 12:57 pm to
quote:

I'd agree with somewhere in India. But NYCs subways during rush hour are beyond belief. Google Images is purged of accurate photos. People jam into the cars until the doors won't close and then a few are pushed back out to the platform.

I lived in Manhattan for 10 years. Rush hour subway cars are packed like sardine cans.


This is a factor but not a determinative one. The New York subway is less riders per mile of track by far as compared to other much less impacted cites cities: Paris, London, Tokyo and probably another 4-5 cities in China. Further, much of density of subway passengersin NYC is in Manhattan, but an outsized portion of the COVID activities is happening where the trains are less present, Queens and the Bronx.
Posted by Diamondawg
Mississippi
Member since Oct 2006
32431 posts
Posted on 5/2/20 at 1:13 pm to
quote:

Nineteen Sixty-eight in the US? Really? That is a strong take...



I have never thought in my lifetime where one party and its complicit media was capable of taking down the entire country and they are willing to do in order to get Trump. You know when that started. Vietnam was a divider but I am thinking that was more into 69 & 70. Assassinations but those were fringe radicals. Democratic Convention was cluster. Maybe I was just young and naive but I don't remember feeling then the way I feel now. Twitter is the worst thing ever invented. I was probably more afraid of nuclear was in 68 than anything going on in our own country. Maybe it depended on where you lived. We all trusted Walter Cronkite back then and maybe we shouldn't have.
Posted by longwayfromLA
NYC
Member since Nov 2007
3331 posts
Posted on 5/2/20 at 1:26 pm to
quote:

I have never thought in my lifetime where one party and its complicit media was capable of taking down the entire country and they are willing to do in order to get Trump. You know when that started. Vietnam was a divider but I am thinking that was more into 69 & 70. Assassinations but those were fringe radicals. Democratic Convention was cluster. Maybe I was just young and naive but I don't remember feeling then the way I feel now. Twitter is the worst thing ever invented. I was probably more afraid of nuclear was in 68 than anything going on in our own country. Maybe it depended on where you lived. We all trusted Walter Cronkite back then and maybe we shouldn't have.



I dunno. A well-known, but broadly detested public figure and a Presidential candidate were killed within a few weeks of each other and a bunch of riots happened for multiple reasons. That just seems much worse than now where either side alternately demonizes the opposition party President on social media. Perhaps we'll just have to disagree on this...
Posted by Diamondawg
Mississippi
Member since Oct 2006
32431 posts
Posted on 5/2/20 at 1:45 pm to
We can do that. However, Sirhan Sirhan is not even American. I thought we were talking about America being divided.
Posted by Auburn1968
NYC
Member since Mar 2019
19861 posts
Posted on 5/2/20 at 1:50 pm to
quote:

VERY glad I lived there, and VERY glad I got out.


I liked the part where I could find 300 restaurants within walking distance.
Posted by longwayfromLA
NYC
Member since Nov 2007
3331 posts
Posted on 5/2/20 at 2:01 pm to
quote:

We can do that. However, Sirhan Sirhan is not even American. I thought we were talking about America being divided.


Fair point, though I'd argue that several dozen Americans in Chicago in late August act very differently if RFK was still around.
Posted by Diamondawg
Mississippi
Member since Oct 2006
32431 posts
Posted on 5/2/20 at 2:05 pm to
quote:

Fair point, though I'd argue that several dozen Americans in Chicago in late August act very differently if RFK was still around.


Without a doubt. Plus, Nixon probably would not have beaten Bobby.
Posted by Buckeye Jeaux
Member since May 2018
17756 posts
Posted on 5/2/20 at 2:12 pm to


^^This is typical rush hour NYC Subway ridership (but not a maxed out car). And extreme rush hours run 7am to 9am then 4:30pm thru 6pm. Millions of people ride like this every day.

quote:

The New York subway is less riders per mile of track
Riders per mile of track?

What about riders per subway car. It's sardines on the NYC subway.

And people from Queens and the Bronx don't use the subway much? LOL !!!

What part of NYC are you claiming to live in? Let me guess... Connecticut? Westchester? Bergen County? long Island?
This post was edited on 5/2/20 at 2:25 pm
Posted by longwayfromLA
NYC
Member since Nov 2007
3331 posts
Posted on 5/2/20 at 2:39 pm to
quote:

Riders per mile of track?

What about riders per subway car. It's sardines on the NYC subway.


I'm saying that those countries, in particular the Asian ones, serve more riders in less space. Said another way, NYC light rail only looks congested if you've not spent much time in other mega-cities.

quote:

And people from Queens and the Bronx don't use the subway much? LOL !!!

I wrote that there were fewer trains in service in Queens and the Bronx than there are Manhattan which is a fact. From there it could be inferred that there is greater ridership in aggregate at stops in Manhattan as compared to the totals in Queens and the Bronx. As it turns out, they keep track of that sort of thing and publish turnstile data - also a fact. At no point did I suggest that people from Queens or the Bronx "didn't use the subway much." That is nonsense that you concocted for your own benefit. Glad you got a laugh out of it though.
Posted by Buckeye Jeaux
Member since May 2018
17756 posts
Posted on 5/2/20 at 3:04 pm to
quote:

I wrote that there were fewer trains in service in Queens and the Bronx than there are Manhattan which is a fact.
^^And you consider this some kind of revelation? Of course Manhattan is the epicenter of NYC.

My point hasn't changed. New Yorkers had been swimming in COVID-19 sheddings from January thru March, yet the death rate (total population divided by COVID deaths) in Metropolitan NYC is in the range of 1/10th of 1%.

This virus had every opportunity to explode catastrophically in Metro NYC, but it did not. This is NOT the plague. This is a serious flu-like virus, but not the mega-disaster sold to us by MSM and the CDC/NIH/IHME/WHO/Gates Foundation, etc.
Posted by longwayfromLA
NYC
Member since Nov 2007
3331 posts
Posted on 5/2/20 at 3:23 pm to
quote:

quote:
I wrote that there were fewer trains in service in Queens and the Bronx than there are Manhattan which is a fact.
^^And you consider this some kind of revelation? Of course Manhattan is the epicenter of NYC.


I wrote:

quote:

much of density of subway passengers in NYC is in Manhattan, but an outsized portion of the COVID activities is happening where the trains are less present, Queens and the Bronx.


That there are fewer trains and riders in Queens and the Bronx is certainly germane to my point that trains cannot be the biggest factor in the COVID outbreak in NYC since the worst of it is occurring outside of Manhattan.

I don't believe it's a revelation to many people that Queens and the Bronx have fewer trains than Manhattan, I'm just saying that for unknown reasons you pushed back on my statement that Queens and the Bronx have fewer trains than Manhattan. You'd have to ask yourself why...
Posted by LSUconvert
Hattiesburg, MS
Member since Aug 2007
6229 posts
Posted on 5/2/20 at 3:26 pm to
quote:

1/10 of 1% of the residents of Metro NYC died of COVID-19


You know that's 1 out of every 1000 people, right?
Posted by Diamondawg
Mississippi
Member since Oct 2006
32431 posts
Posted on 5/2/20 at 4:15 pm to
quote:



You know that's 1 out of every 1000 people, right?
Muh decimal place. That doesn’t fit his narrative
Posted by DMAN1968
Member since Apr 2019
10152 posts
Posted on 5/2/20 at 4:33 pm to
quote:

but not the mega-disaster sold to us by

quote:

longwayfromLA


FIFY
Posted by Buckeye Jeaux
Member since May 2018
17756 posts
Posted on 5/2/20 at 5:36 pm to


quote:

I don't believe it's a revelation to many people that Queens and the Bronx have fewer trains than Manhattan, I'm just saying that for unknown reasons you pushed back on my statement that Queens and the Bronx have fewer trains than Manhattan. You'd have to ask yourself why...
You do realize that all trains from Queens and The Bronx go to Manhattan, right? And about half of all workers who live in the Bronx and Queens work in *Manhattan, right?

You never answered what part of NY you claim to live in.

*Link to 16 page study on where workers from the various boroughs travel to for work. LINK
This post was edited on 5/2/20 at 6:37 pm
Posted by PsychTiger
Member since Jul 2004
99523 posts
Posted on 5/2/20 at 5:48 pm to
A simple solution, nuke Manhattan and open the rest of the country up.
Posted by Buckeye Jeaux
Member since May 2018
17756 posts
Posted on 5/2/20 at 5:56 pm to
quote:

nuke Manhattan?


Pretty sure diBlasio/Cuomo/Birx/Fauci just did that.
Posted by longwayfromLA
NYC
Member since Nov 2007
3331 posts
Posted on 5/2/20 at 7:03 pm to
quote:

You do realize that all trains from Queens and The Bronx go to Manhattan, right? And about half of all workers who live in the Bronx and Queens work in *Manhattan, right?


Wait. So because the trains in the Bronx and Queens go to Manhattan and because people commute from the Bronx and Queens to Manhattan, you now are arguing that there are more riders and trains in Queen & the Bronx than there are in Manhattan? By that logic, you could claim there is as much light rail activity in Newark as there is in Manhattan since the Path connects to MTA at a half dozen stops in lower Manhattan.

What am I saying is what I said. There are more physical trains, MTA stops, and human being catching light rain in Manhattan than there are in either Queens or the Bronx. That is unequivocally, verifiably true. So true in fact that two posts ago, you described it as not a revelation for me to state this obvious fact. Not sure why you disagree with yourself on this point every other message.

LINK

anyhow, here is a link to a dashboard that shows ridership by stop overlaid onto a map of the city. It should handily clear up for you where the stops are located and where the rides happen. Then you can again agree with yourself from tow post ago.
Posted by Buckeye Jeaux
Member since May 2018
17756 posts
Posted on 5/2/20 at 7:20 pm to




Here is my point again (Since you seem to be lost):

My point hasn't changed. New Yorker's had been swimming in COVID-19 sheddings from January thru March, yet the death rate (total population divided by COVID deaths) in Metropolitan NYC is in the range of 1/10th of 1%.

This virus had every opportunity to explode catastrophically in Metro NYC, but it did not. This is NOT the plague. This is a serious flu-like virus, but not the mega-disaster sold to us by MSM and the CDC/NIH/IHME/WHO/Gates Foundation, etc.



first pageprev pagePage 3 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram