Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

Court of International Trade upholds Trump authority to end the “de minimis” exemption

Posted on 8/13/26 at 2:52 pm
Posted by Major Dutch Schaefer
Location: Classified
Member since Nov 2011
39703 posts
Posted on 8/13/26 at 2:52 pm
Posted by Bunk Moreland
Member since Dec 2010
69981 posts
Posted on 8/13/26 at 2:53 pm to
So we love rulings about international law today?
This post was edited on 8/13/26 at 2:54 pm
Posted by timdonaghyswhistle
Member since Jul 2018
21378 posts
Posted on 8/13/26 at 2:54 pm to
U.S. Court of International Trade.

And yes, we do.

Especially if it pisses you off.
This post was edited on 8/13/26 at 2:56 pm
Posted by dgnx6
Member since Feb 2006
91521 posts
Posted on 8/13/26 at 2:55 pm to
It was always strange to me you could get something delivered from Hong Kong cheaper than from another state.






Posted by SundayFunday
Member since Sep 2011
10506 posts
Posted on 8/13/26 at 2:58 pm to
quote:

So we love rulings about international law today?



quote:

U.S. Court of International Trade.




Posted by timdonaghyswhistle
Member since Jul 2018
21378 posts
Posted on 8/13/26 at 3:00 pm to
Come on now. He edited his faulty premise before too many people saw it.
Posted by Ingeniero
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2013
23554 posts
Posted on 8/13/26 at 3:09 pm to
This is WORSE for consumers

Now instead of regular Joe being exempt from tariffs and having big time importers paying them, everyone's getting the bill. How do y'all still fall for this bullshite that other countries are paying tariffs? YOU are the revenue he's talking about.
Posted by HubbaBubba
North of DFW, TX
Member since Oct 2010
52599 posts
Posted on 8/13/26 at 3:19 pm to
TEMU is fricked.
Posted by Jjdoc
Cali
Member since Mar 2016
55773 posts
Posted on 8/13/26 at 3:37 pm to
Personally, I dont give 2 shotes about what they have to say. Win or lose, the result is the same. Frick them and the a-hole nations that allow it.


Posted by TenWheelsForJesus
Member since Jan 2018
11703 posts
Posted on 8/13/26 at 4:13 pm to
quote:

So we love rulings about international law today?


Why do so many people think like this?

Is it too hard to like rulings based on their impact?

Must we always love or hate decisions based on from where they come?

This happens all the time here. "So we like this guy now?" No, we just agree with what he said in this particular instance. Should I disavow my personal beliefs because someone I don't like agrees with me on a single issue? Do I have to like someone because we agree on a minority of issues?
Posted by Jauquismos
Member since Jul 2023
1461 posts
Posted on 8/13/26 at 5:46 pm to
Yeah, you know.

Ignoramus.
Posted by BTROleMisser
Murica'
Member since Nov 2017
16137 posts
Posted on 8/13/26 at 5:48 pm to
quote:

So we love rulings about international law today?


Cry, TDS boy.
Posted by trinidadtiger
Member since Jun 2017
20761 posts
Posted on 8/13/26 at 6:36 pm to
quote:

It was always strange to me you could get something delivered from Hong Kong cheaper than from another state.


You are correct. In Trump's first term he threatened to walk away from the universal postal agreement where we were subsidizing inpound shipments.

China was costing the USPS billions by exploiting it.

Literally you have, as you said, a package from china costing less than a package delivered in the US.

This is the next step to tariff them.

And for the idiots on this site, you paid for these in your taxes when millions of packages had to be sorted at customs in airports, then delivered by the postal service, all at minimal cost, versus using a normal delivery system of importing, storing, sorting and delivering by the private sector.



first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram