Started By
Message

Cops pull over wrong vehicle, draw guns after Flock cameras mistakenly identify car, twice

Posted on 8/8/26 at 2:47 pm
Posted by Night Vision
Member since Feb 2018
23808 posts
Posted on 8/8/26 at 2:47 pm
LINK

Flock surveillance cameras have been under fire from freedom lovers, left and right, because people object to a private company spying on law abiding citizens on public roads, for some reason.

And this latest case of mistaken identity could have turned deadly.

Yes, someone cleared from suspicion in a murder case still had their vehicle flagged by Flock, leading officers to stop interstate traffic, pull the vehicle over, and draw guns on a woman all because police forgot to update their data with Flock.

Here's Fox 6 Milwaukee:

It happened at around 4:45 p.m. Thursday, Aug. 6. Video from I-94 in Waukesha County shows multiple officers with guns drawn - and a passenger sticking their hands out the window.

Police pulled the car over after a Flock camera flagged it for a Milwaukee homicide. But when Brookfield Police called the Milwaukee Police Department, MPD said they no longer needed the car or the people inside, so officers let them go.

FOX6 News reached out to MPD to learn why that car was still active in the Flock system. The department said it was not a Flock issue, but a personnel issue - staff failed to remove a wanted vehicle alert from the system.

Amber Newell, the woman pulled over in this case, was pulled over last Monday as well, by officers with guns drawn, in Milwaukee because Flock flagged her car. Milwaukee PD failed to clear her in the Flock system after the first mistake, so she had to go through it all again a week later.

'I haven't been asleep since this has happened,' Newell said. 'Every time I close my eyes, all I can see is guns.' ...

'It was very embarrassing because after they put us in cuffs, they walked us to the car, I don't know what's going on, I'm scared, all you see is people in they cars recording,' Newell said.

...
Posted by loogaroo
Welsh
Member since Dec 2005
43421 posts
Posted on 8/8/26 at 2:49 pm to
They just put a new one up on Burbank going towards Starring Ln. here in Baton Rouge.

frickers are popping up everywhere.
Posted by timdonaghyswhistle
Member since Jul 2018
21354 posts
Posted on 8/8/26 at 2:53 pm to
quote:

The department said it was not a Flock issue, but a personnel issue - staff failed to remove a wanted vehicle alert from the system.


So who's going to jail?
Posted by DinoSpumoni
Member since Jul 2026
22 posts
Posted on 8/8/26 at 2:53 pm to
frick Flock

quote:

'Every time I close my eyes, all I can see is guns.'


But frick people like this too. Just get a lawyer like everyone else and don’t make a socio-political statement
Posted by hogcard1964
Alabama
Member since Jan 2017
21324 posts
Posted on 8/8/26 at 2:54 pm to
quote:

I don't know what's going on, I'm scared, all you see is people in they cars recording,'.


I don't know what this means.
Posted by Ailsa
Member since May 2020
11614 posts
Posted on 8/8/26 at 2:57 pm to
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.


quote:

No federal money. You wanna do it, do it on your own."

"We better watch out.
Posted by Jspaspa3303
Member since Jun 2020
3070 posts
Posted on 8/8/26 at 3:11 pm to
The vehicle was wanted for questioning in connection with a MURDER.
I don’t care if guns were drawn. If a vehicle connected to a homicide is located, a felony stop is exactly what I would expect law enforcement to do. That’s not “harassment.” That’s officers taking a potentially dangerous situation seriously and protecting themselves and the public. And as far as Flock cameras go, I have ZERO problem with them.
These cameras can help law enforcement locate vehicles connected to murders, carjackings, armed robberies, kidnappings, human trafficking, stolen vehicles, and other serious crimes. If a camera helps identify and locate a vehicle connected to a violent crime, I want law enforcement to have that tool.If a Flock camera helps get a murderer, carjacker, trafficker, or other violent criminal off the street, I’m all for it.

If you’re worried about the technology, ask for transparency and accountability. But don’t pretend that locating a vehicle connected to a murder is somehow the problem.
Posted by Night Vision
Member since Feb 2018
23808 posts
Posted on 8/8/26 at 3:13 pm to
Posted by onepiecemayne
Member since Nov 2023
1278 posts
Posted on 8/8/26 at 3:15 pm to
I'm voting for whoever gets rid of them.
Posted by Lawyered
The Sip
Member since Oct 2016
38726 posts
Posted on 8/8/26 at 3:16 pm to
Our bad

Technology ! Haha
Posted by Jspaspa3303
Member since Jun 2020
3070 posts
Posted on 8/8/26 at 3:17 pm to
I ask this simple question? If your loved one was murdered, kidnapped, being sex trafficked, would you want law enforcement to have this tool at their disposal? Yes or no?
Posted by Night Vision
Member since Feb 2018
23808 posts
Posted on 8/8/26 at 3:19 pm to
“Those who would give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety.”

Benjamin Franklin
Posted by Jspaspa3303
Member since Jun 2020
3070 posts
Posted on 8/8/26 at 3:20 pm to
Answer my question don’t quote Ben Franklin . Answer my question?
Posted by Night Vision
Member since Feb 2018
23808 posts
Posted on 8/8/26 at 3:20 pm to
I just answered your question dumbass.
Posted by Crimson Wraith
Member since Jan 2014
30351 posts
Posted on 8/8/26 at 3:23 pm to
How many cameras do we need?

5 million, 6 million?
Posted by RFK
Mar-a-Lago
Member since May 2012
3367 posts
Posted on 8/8/26 at 3:23 pm to
Honestly I’m good with it.

If I haven’t committed a crime, I don’t care if they record me. If they accidentally stop me I would assume it can be cleared up as soon as they realize I haven’t committed a crime.

These are the compromises a modern society makes for the benefit of all.
Posted by Jspaspa3303
Member since Jun 2020
3070 posts
Posted on 8/8/26 at 3:23 pm to
So you would really be okay with your loved one remaining kidnapped or their murder remaining unsolved because you’re worried about a camera and something Benjamin Franklin said about liberty in the 1700s? What a dumbass argument. Nobody is saying privacy and liberty don’t matter. They absolutely do. But there has to be some common sense and balance. If technology can help law enforcement locate a kidnapped person, identify a vehicle connected to a murder, or get a violent criminal off the street, I’m going to support using that technology with reasonable safeguards and accountability. If your biggest concern is a camera helping police find the person who murdered or kidnapped someone you love, maybe your priorities need to be reconsidered.
Posted by hogcard1964
Alabama
Member since Jan 2017
21324 posts
Posted on 8/8/26 at 3:24 pm to
I just want large "flocks" of them within all of our major cities. So, what... maybe 10-12 million.
Posted by Night Vision
Member since Feb 2018
23808 posts
Posted on 8/8/26 at 3:25 pm to
quote:

If they accidentally stop me I would assume it can be cleared up as soon as they realize I haven’t committed a crime.



What happens when you get stopped "accidentally" and wind up getting shot or killed?
Posted by Night Vision
Member since Feb 2018
23808 posts
Posted on 8/8/26 at 3:27 pm to
How many jabs did you take?

What happens the next time they try to shut us down and they have a camera every mile in any direction you go?

first pageprev pagePage 1 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram