- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 11/19/25 at 10:45 am to Decatur
Posted on 11/19/25 at 10:46 am to Fuzzy Dunlop
Is Tom Fitton advising the prosecution?
Posted on 11/19/25 at 10:47 am to Bunk Moreland
Lindsey Halligan wore this outfit when she was with the GJ:

This post was edited on 11/19/25 at 10:48 am
Posted on 11/19/25 at 10:53 am to boosiebadazz
From CNN
Dreeben’d
quote:
The full grand jury never reviewed the indictment it handed up against former FBI Director James Comey, interim US Attorney Lindsey Halligan conceded Wednesday.
In a shocking back and forth, prosecutors said that instead of presenting a new indictment to the grand jury after it declined to approve one of the counts, Halligan simply brought an altered version to the magistrate’s courtroom for the grand jury’s foreperson to sign.
“The new indictment wasn’t a new indictment,” Lemons said, attempting to justify that it was only reviewed by the foreperson.
Judge Michael Nachmanoff quickly called Halligan, who was the only prosecutor who presented the case to the grand jury, to the lectern, asking her to confirm that the entire grand jury was never presented the altered indictment.
The judge started, “Am I correct -”
“No, you’re not,” Halligan interrupted. She said that there was one additional grand juror in the magistrate’s courtroom and quoted her back-and-forth with that judge.
“I’m familiar with the transcript,” Nachmanoff said. He then told her to sit down.
Comey’s attorney Michael Dreeben then argued to the judge that, given the testimony of the prosecutor, “no indictment was returned.”
“There is no indictment,” he said, adding that the statute of limitations has now elapsed against Comey on charges of lying to Congress.
Dreeben’d
Posted on 11/19/25 at 10:55 am to Decatur
Posted on 11/19/25 at 11:02 am to boosiebadazz
Such a shite show. Entertaining enough that I’m not sure I want it to end just yet though.
Posted on 11/19/25 at 11:03 am to Decatur
I was too generous to the prosecution when I called this the Hindenburg of failed indictments. It's more like the Hindenburg landed on the deck of the Titanic just before it hit the iceberg.
Posted on 11/19/25 at 11:10 am to boosiebadazz
quote:
VoxDawg still has this as the foothold they need to eventually get Obama on treason
Even better
His argument is that these prosecutions are part of a strategy to educate the normie population on all of these purported crimes, so that when the GTOE Kraken is released, they're conditioned.
However, this prosecution is conditioning the normie population to assume Trump's DOJ is filled with idiots.
Posted on 11/19/25 at 11:11 am to Decatur
quote:
Entertaining enough that I’m not sure I want it to end just yet though.
Gonna float my Halligan is a black hat theory.
Posted on 11/19/25 at 11:17 am to SlowFlowPro
Sounds like the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure are now a Deep State plot.
Posted on 11/19/25 at 11:18 am to boosiebadazz
As someone said the other day, this is a permanent disbarment-level offense.
Posted on 11/19/25 at 11:19 am to TigerDoc
Trump is not a stupid person. At what point does he throw his arms up at all of this chicanery? Or, dare I get too extreme, malarky. This is on the fringe of tomfoolery.
Posted on 11/19/25 at 11:20 am to SlowFlowPro
I was hoping there was an innocent explanation given that she had really only done real estate and was way out of her competency level. But this seems to border on knowingly dishonest.
Posted on 11/19/25 at 11:20 am to boosiebadazz
This is certainly not a I didn't know that I couldn't do that scenario.
Popular
Back to top


7








