- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Columbia County Sheriffs Arrest Legally Blind Man For Carrying Walking Stick
Posted on 11/8/22 at 9:34 am to DisplacedBuckeye
Posted on 11/8/22 at 9:34 am to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
No...she isn't. Found another fricking Karen, though.
She absolutely is a public servant and is paid to take shite from the public.
You’re wrong. Take your L, tyrant.
2
Posted on 11/8/22 at 9:37 am to TROLA
quote:That's what the last guy who killed someone with a cane sword said, too.
It was a foldable stick in his back pocket..
Apparently he needs the stick for darker conditions and was reported somewhere that he had left his home while still dawn so he could get to jury duty..
Posted on 11/8/22 at 9:38 am to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:I mean that I would separate them in terms of relative consistency of professionalism.
I wouldn't, if the discussion is about tyranny.
But sure. In terms of being used to inflict tyranny, governments will happily make use of both.
Posted on 11/8/22 at 9:39 am to LSUAngelHere1
quote:
She absolutely is a public servant and is paid to take shite from the public.
Guy didn't even seem to really be "giving her shite." He just seemed a bit perturbed. I watched the vid up to the moment he asked if he was being detained, after he clearly showed her the stick that she apparently suspected was a gun, and she said yes.
I can't figure out what occurred up to that point that might have possibly been deemed "detainable." There was no reason not to just let the perturbed guy move along at that point - no reason whatsoever.
Posted on 11/8/22 at 9:52 am to Y.A. Tittle
quote:The cops "thought" it was a gun for some reason.
I can't figure out what occurred up to that point that might have possibly been deemed "detainable." There was no reason not to just let the perturbed guy move along at that point - no reason whatsoever.
And, apparently, their ability to amp themselves down from such a thing is on par with the ability of a 5 year old to accept not getting the cereal with a toy in it.
Posted on 11/8/22 at 9:56 am to Abraham H Parnassis
quote:
That's what the last guy who killed someone with a cane sword said, too.
Posted on 11/8/22 at 10:05 am to LSUAngelHere1
quote:
paid to take shite from the public
No, she isn't.
Keep repeating it, but that's not what law enforcement get paid to do.
Posted on 11/8/22 at 10:06 am to NM Tiger 67
quote:
But sure. In terms of being used to inflict tyranny, governments will happily make use of both.
Correct.
Posted on 11/8/22 at 10:14 am to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:yeah I'm sure you have nothing to say about her illegal arrest and detention of an innocent person. You are much more concerned that the victim called her exactly what she was. That's gotta sting
That's all I've commented about.
Posted on 11/8/22 at 10:17 am to Y.A. Tittle
quote:
Guy didn't even seem to really be "giving her shite." He just seemed a bit perturbed. I watched the vid up to the moment he asked if he was being detained, after he clearly showed her the stick that she apparently suspected was a gun, and she said yes. I can't figure out what occurred up to that point that might have possibly been deemed "detainable." There was no reason not to just let the perturbed guy move along at that point - no reason whatsoever.
Oh I agree but buckeye is claiming she isnt paid to take any shite from the public.
Posted on 11/8/22 at 10:20 am to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
No, she isn't. Keep repeating it, but that's not what law enforcement get paid to do.
It’s the public’s right to say frick you to public servants and she is paid to be one so YES she is paid to take shite bc that’s come with the job she applied for.
But you already know all this….
This post was edited on 11/8/22 at 10:20 am
Posted on 11/8/22 at 10:20 am to LSUAngelHere1
quote:
Oh I agree but buckeye is claiming she isnt paid to take any shite from the public.
Maybe not. I would suggest she is paid to not overreact to what she might perceive as someone "giving her shite," though.
I don't know if that's just a semantic difference or not, but I think it should hold true either way.
Posted on 11/8/22 at 10:28 am to Bard
quote:
That being said, while she quickly worked her way up to bitch mode, he started off there.
No.
quote:
That being said, while he quickly worked his way up to bitch mode, she started off at tyrant mode.
Much more accurate.
The peace officer has the responsibility of not escalating, and she did exactly the opposite.
She's not fit to be a cop, and neither is her supervisor.
Posted on 11/8/22 at 10:32 am to UncleFestersLegs
quote:
yeah I'm sure you have nothing to say about her illegal arrest and detention of an innocent person.
I think enough has been said about that. Posting "I agree" is pretty fricking boring. I'd rather discuss things I don't agree with.
Posted on 11/8/22 at 10:33 am to Y.A. Tittle
quote:
I would suggest she is paid to not overreact to what she might perceive as someone "giving her shite," though.
Yeah, I'd agree with that.
Posted on 11/8/22 at 10:35 am to LSUAngelHere1
quote:
It’s the public’s right to say frick you to public servants and she is paid to be one so YES she is paid to take shite bc that’s come with the job she applied for.
Look dude, I get that you have it in your head that the taxes you probably don't pay mean you're their boss, but that isn't the case.
Posted on 11/8/22 at 10:36 am to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
No, she isn't.
Keep repeating it, but that's not what law enforcement get paid to do.
it is actually a part of it.
citizens have the right to air their grievances to government.
if you are working on behalf of the government, you are a representative of that government, its part of your job.
Posted on 11/8/22 at 10:40 am to AMS
quote:
if you are working on behalf of the government, you are a representative of that government, its part of your job.
Where do you people get this stuff?
Posted on 11/8/22 at 4:05 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:the SC has ruled that profanity aimed at police officers is protected by the 1st amendment which protects speech defined to redress grievances with the government. Seems they understand that the police represent the government
Where do you people get this stuff?
ETA:
Cohen v. California (1971)
City of Houston v. Hill (1987)
This post was edited on 11/8/22 at 4:10 pm
Posted on 11/8/22 at 4:06 pm to SantaFe
quote:
The sergeant killed his K9 dog by leaving it his car.
I would have fired him and charged him with animal cruelty for that.
Charge him for killing a cop like they would for any non-cop who killed a police K9.
ETA: How did he kill a dog in his car? I have NEVER seen a cop turn off their cruiser.
This post was edited on 11/8/22 at 4:07 pm
Page 6 of 10
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News