- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
colorado bill wants to require operating systems verify age of users
Posted on 3/5/26 at 5:35 pm
Posted on 3/5/26 at 5:35 pm
Colorado moves age checks from websites to operating systems
Unless I'm reading this wrong, they want to mandate that Microsoft, Apple, and Android verify user age at the OS level rather than the application level.
yeah I'm sure that those companies will hop right to making a special version of their software just for colorado
nevermind, Linux distros....
Oh, but they don't want voter ID verification.
This isn't about protecting children, it's about government's push for total surveillance, masked as protection for kids to ram it through
Unless I'm reading this wrong, they want to mandate that Microsoft, Apple, and Android verify user age at the OS level rather than the application level.
yeah I'm sure that those companies will hop right to making a special version of their software just for colorado
nevermind, Linux distros....
Oh, but they don't want voter ID verification.
This isn't about protecting children, it's about government's push for total surveillance, masked as protection for kids to ram it through
Posted on 3/5/26 at 5:38 pm to Don Quixote
Time to dust off an oldie but a goodie.

Posted on 3/5/26 at 5:39 pm to Don Quixote
quote:
Oh, but they don't want voter ID verification.
Posted on 3/5/26 at 5:42 pm to ninthward
quote:
Colorado is a shithole
yep, it's why we left last year after 30 yrs
Posted on 3/5/26 at 5:43 pm to Don Quixote
Unenforceable.
From a software engineering point of view this proposal runs into a basic reality.
Operating systems do not actually know who the person using the device is. They only know the account that was used to set up the device, and that information can be typed in by anyone. A child could simply enter an adult birth date during setup or use a parent’s account and the system would report the wrong age.
Many devices also allow multiple users, shared browsers or sideloaded apps, which makes enforcement even weaker.
The open web creates another problem because normal websites would need a new browser standard to read an age signal from the operating system, which raises privacy concerns and would take years for the industry to adopt.
Even then, people could bypass the system using different browsers, Linux devices, VPNs or services outside Colorado.
Because of these limits, the system would either require real identity verification, which creates major privacy and political issues or it would rely on self-reported data that is easy to bypass.
For that reason most engineers would expect one of three outcomes: the law gets struck down in court, it passes but never works in practice or it ends up as a weak parental control style feature that does little to actually enforce age restrictions.
From a software engineering point of view this proposal runs into a basic reality.
Operating systems do not actually know who the person using the device is. They only know the account that was used to set up the device, and that information can be typed in by anyone. A child could simply enter an adult birth date during setup or use a parent’s account and the system would report the wrong age.
Many devices also allow multiple users, shared browsers or sideloaded apps, which makes enforcement even weaker.
The open web creates another problem because normal websites would need a new browser standard to read an age signal from the operating system, which raises privacy concerns and would take years for the industry to adopt.
Even then, people could bypass the system using different browsers, Linux devices, VPNs or services outside Colorado.
Because of these limits, the system would either require real identity verification, which creates major privacy and political issues or it would rely on self-reported data that is easy to bypass.
For that reason most engineers would expect one of three outcomes: the law gets struck down in court, it passes but never works in practice or it ends up as a weak parental control style feature that does little to actually enforce age restrictions.
This post was edited on 3/5/26 at 5:50 pm
Posted on 3/5/26 at 5:45 pm to Don Quixote
quote:Which of course requires ID.
Unless I'm reading this wrong, they want to mandate that Microsoft, Apple, and Android verify user age at the OS level rather than the application level.
Yet no ID for voting.
Posted on 3/5/26 at 5:47 pm to Don Quixote
Today’s kids are tech savvy enough to find ways around it. They may not be able to spell “cat”, but they will figure out how to access their tech.
Popular
Back to top

6










