Started By
Message

re: CNN Platforming Crockett, AOC, Omar and Schumer on the day of Charlie's Funeral.

Posted on 9/22/25 at 7:31 am to
Posted by BigTigerJoe
Member since Aug 2022
11043 posts
Posted on 9/22/25 at 7:31 am to
quote:

CNN Platforming Crockett, AOC, Omar and Schumer on the day of Charlie's Funeral.

Their real identities:

Posted by JellyRoll
Member since Apr 2024
1372 posts
Posted on 9/22/25 at 7:50 am to
All of them are lying POS.
Posted by dgnx6
Member since Feb 2006
85181 posts
Posted on 9/22/25 at 7:53 am to
quote:

The Democrats can’t control that anymore than the Republicans can stop Candace from slandering Brigitte Macron.


Well you are comparing elected officials to a podcaster.



Posted by BamaGradinTn
Murfreesboro
Member since Dec 2008
28455 posts
Posted on 9/22/25 at 7:56 am to
It was hard to believe that someone as stupid as AOC could get elected to Congress.

Then Jasmine Crockett came along and said "hold my Colt 45".
Posted by lepdagod
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2015
5351 posts
Posted on 9/22/25 at 8:01 am to
quote:

Whomever owns CNN and doesn't want to look like the Devil.

Someone has to have some say as to what goes on.


I don’t think people were as offended as you…
Posted by Wildcat1996
Lexington, KY
Member since Jul 2020
9184 posts
Posted on 9/22/25 at 8:05 am to
The tacit approval of the killing of Kirk by various left-leaning pundits and pols has been pretty incredible to observe. Of course no one has directly said it, but has been implied. They wanted the attack on Kirk's conservative ideas in the Congressional Record and needed some member of the House to go read it. They sent AOC.

You can't convince me she even knew much of what Kirk said. Someone took the time to pen those words for her to recite. Why her? Because they know that is the safest seat in the House and there is no way she can lose it. There was nothing spontaneous about it; it was calculated and deliberate.

It was important for the Democrats for the official record to show that Kirk was a "bad person" who espoused bad ideas. And the implication is that since he was a bad person, perhaps his killing was for the best.
Posted by Diamondawg
Mississippi
Member since Oct 2006
36709 posts
Posted on 9/22/25 at 8:07 am to
quote:

tacit
Tacit? Really?
Posted by Wildcat1996
Lexington, KY
Member since Jul 2020
9184 posts
Posted on 9/22/25 at 8:38 am to
I have yet to see a prominent leftist leader (official or otherwise) directly approve of his murder. There have been a few idiots on social media who now find themselves unemployed, but I haven't seen anyone of prominence make such a statement. I can't see everything and am happy to be proven wrong.
Posted by Diamondawg
Mississippi
Member since Oct 2006
36709 posts
Posted on 9/22/25 at 10:06 am to
I guess you and I have different definitions of "tacit", then.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram