- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 3/19/26 at 11:36 am to loogaroo
But the Panicans said gas prices and shite
Posted on 3/21/26 at 4:24 am to SDVTiger
@LittleJerrySeinfeld is gonna be upset
Posted on 3/21/26 at 4:34 am to tide06
quote:
If those numbers are true it means he’s replaced the AF people who are opposed to this with GOPe/neocons who previously opposed him.
What will they come up with next, folks!?
Man, they just can’t deal with Trump rationally or reasonably, in any way, at any level can they??
Posted on 3/21/26 at 4:40 am to Boodis Man
quote:
MAGA is not what got trump re-elected. it was the independents, libertarians, and anti-war crowd (joe rogan viewers) who pushed him over the edge. if not for them, he loses to Kamala. and he most certainly has lost them all now with the actions in his second term.
I guess should have waited to attack Iran once the nuke had landed in our backyard.
Posted on 3/21/26 at 5:08 am to Deuces
quote:
Tucker Carlson
The thing with Tucker is that Idk what to think about him. It's ok to not agree with what Trump is doing in Iran and still support the President. I don't get that feeling from the people who are like "This isn't America First." "This isn't what I voted for.". I feel as though these people are trying to get people to turn away from voting Republican right before the midterms. I know a lot of people believe that we attacked Iran solely because of Israel. I personally believe that we had our own reasons for doing it to weaken BRICS and protect American Hegemony. Idk, if Tucker is still trust worthy, but I also know that the Israel Lobby has been trying to take down Tucker for a while now. They seem very close to achieving their goals with recent events. I don't feel comfortable supporting it. My question is Tucker actually guilty of it or is being set up?
Posted on 3/21/26 at 5:27 am to TenWheelsForJesus
quote:
If you want proof on this board, just look at the majority of posters complaining. They were never with Trump. Most of them were in the group known as ronbots. They have been anti-Trump for years.
And what the hell is AF?
Posted on 3/21/26 at 5:38 am to LSUbest
quote:
And what the hell is AF?
Posted on 3/21/26 at 5:48 am to Bunk Moreland
Subtle. Subtle and clever meme indeed…...to someone out there, I’m sure, maybe. Now, what is it even supposed to mean or signify?
Posted on 3/21/26 at 9:29 am to davyjones
quote:
If those numbers are true it means he’s replaced the AF people who are opposed to this with GOPe/neocons who previously opposed him.
quote:
What will they come up with next, folks!?
This from the guy who vehemently supports intervention and FISA after Trump and his appointees opposed both during the campaign.
Here’s Trump opposing FISA
Here’s Trump promising mass deportations:
Youtube Link
Here are quotes from Trump on getting us out of wars:
quote:
“Under Trump, we will have no more wars. No more wars. No more wars. We will have prosperity and peace.”
“I’m not going to start a war. I’m going to stop wars.”
“We will measure our success… by the wars that we end. And perhaps most importantly, the wars we never get into.”
Youtube Link
I and many others supported all of those statements when they were made and many GOPe and neocons didn’t.
Now that Trump wants intervention globally (Venezuela, Iran 2x, Cuba next), has an FBI director who wants FISA extended for ten years and wants to back off mass deportations. My position is that if it’s true his support is steady right now it means he had to backfill people who don’t like the new platform and feel they were deceived with people who do.
Each of those positions were considered GOPe or Neocon positions during the campaign therefore it stands to reason previous never trumpers and neocons are now supporting him and are backfilling those who don’t.
There have already been public statements of support from people like Mike Pence to back that hypothesis up.
So by all means, feel free to laugh because you can’t rationally explain how you personally supported so many contradictory things and continue to flip flop on issues like an empty vessel yearning to be told what to think without moral, rational or political foundations to guide your actions. Some people actually have bedrock values and don’t change just because a political figure they champion decides to change course after golfing with Lyndsay Graham or got a phone call from a donor.
I’m not anti Trump, I would still I support him generally. I just happen to disagree with virtually every change in policy he’s made since being elected and refuse to just pretend he hasn’t vacated 25% of his campaign promises and proceeded to attack those who ask him why.
I’m not even strongly against missile or air strikes against nuke sites if the intel is solid. I just don’t want new wars that involve ground troops and would very much prefer to focus on fixing our own domestic issues to expending all the political capital he was given on foreign ventures that don’t benefit his base in any measurable way.
This post was edited on 3/21/26 at 9:33 am
Posted on 3/28/26 at 12:42 am to FLTech
quote:
If you take out election fraud, Trump won 70-30
Everybody pushed Trump over the finish line.
Bingo ^^^^^
Posted on 3/28/26 at 7:33 am to loogaroo
That’s why people say it’s a cult
Posted on 3/28/26 at 7:35 am to Patato Salad
A cult won every swing state? Impressive!
Popular
Back to top



0







