- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: CIA secretly changed whistleblower rules same month complaint was filed
Posted on 9/27/19 at 6:09 pm to Godfather1
Posted on 9/27/19 at 6:09 pm to Godfather1
quote:Absolutely true.
You’d muse about what he was hiding if he hadn’t released it. There’s no winning for him with you people.
cwill would be claiming that he needed to see it if he hadn’t released it.
1
Posted on 9/27/19 at 6:09 pm to Nguyener
quote:
Obama spent something like 50 million dollars prosecuting and silencing whistle blowers, sources, and journalists.
We still don’t know the details on the money that’s used to defend congressional members who’ve been accused of sexual indiscretions. We need to know how much money is spent each year paying off interns and pages and who the offenders are.
Posted on 9/27/19 at 6:10 pm to BeefDawg
It’s a 2019 version of Kafka’s The Trial
Posted on 9/27/19 at 6:13 pm to Godfather1
quote:
You’d muse about what he was hiding if he hadn’t released it. There’s no winning for him with you people.
Accepting your view of my view as true, the “hearsay” would still be just hearsay with no level of corroboration from the actual transcript. JFC, seems fairly self evident. Even ole pence seemed to voice that concern.
Posted on 9/27/19 at 6:14 pm to gthog61
quote:
gthog61
You usually seem to be just angry...now a liddle’ deluded. Are you ok?
This post was edited on 9/27/19 at 6:18 pm
Posted on 9/27/19 at 6:15 pm to Scruffy
quote:
cwill would be claiming that he needed to see it if he hadn’t released it.
I never took you as a member of the mind reading crowd.
Posted on 9/27/19 at 6:16 pm to cwill
The just discussed this on Lou Dobbs, so at least it's getting out in the media.
No sane person will agree with this.
No sane person will agree with this.
Posted on 9/27/19 at 6:19 pm to cwill
quote:
the “hearsay” would still be just hearsay with no level of corroboration from the actual transcript. JFC, seems fairly self evident.
That doesn’t make one whit of difference to Schiff and company. And you know it.
Releasing it gives them one less thing to use against him.
Posted on 9/27/19 at 6:22 pm to Godfather1
quote:
That doesn’t make one whit of difference to Schiff and company. And you know it.
It doesn’t matter what they think, it’s what they know and what they have to work with...you don’t hand them any level of corroboration. Trump would do well to rid himself of the clearly senile and confused Giuliani.
Posted on 9/27/19 at 6:22 pm to cwill
quote:It is more of the projection crowd.
I never took you as a member of the mind reading crowd.
I just don’t believe that anyone who is adamant that Trump was wrong wouldn’t be ok his side in this situation.
Everyone who is in the “Trump was wrong group” would be demanding that he release the transcript.
Posted on 9/27/19 at 6:30 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
Someone should look into the procedures governing those drastic changes which substituted hearsay for direct knowledge.
This appears to be a "taking" of a constitutional right to due process. Thus a material change.
ALSO, Utah law requires a posting of any proposed change in administrative rules and regulations before that change can be invoked (posted for a period of 6 months for comments). If Federal law is the same (I suspect it may be), then that change is null and void without the posting.
Link to Federal Register on Rulemaking - appears to require a period for comments -
LINK
This appears to be a "taking" of a constitutional right to due process. Thus a material change.
ALSO, Utah law requires a posting of any proposed change in administrative rules and regulations before that change can be invoked (posted for a period of 6 months for comments). If Federal law is the same (I suspect it may be), then that change is null and void without the posting.
Link to Federal Register on Rulemaking - appears to require a period for comments -
LINK
This post was edited on 9/27/19 at 6:38 pm
Posted on 9/27/19 at 6:32 pm to TigerBait1971
Where is Barr with all the indictments? The corruption has been going on for years and is beyond blatant and massive.
Posted on 9/27/19 at 6:37 pm to PUB
Sessions and Barr dragging their feet instead of their nuts is why this shite is going on.
Posted on 9/27/19 at 6:37 pm to cwill
Deluded my arse, I know more about all this than you obviously do
Of course I am angry
I watch this shite
Schiff openly lied in a congressional hearing and the likes of you support him. I can’t tell him what a shitass he is so you are his proxy
Of course I am angry
I watch this shite
Schiff openly lied in a congressional hearing and the likes of you support him. I can’t tell him what a shitass he is so you are his proxy
Posted on 9/27/19 at 6:43 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
quote:
An agency must not take action which goes beyond its statutory authority, or violates the constitution. Agencies must follow an open public process...
Federal Register
LINK
This post was edited on 9/27/19 at 6:44 pm
Posted on 9/27/19 at 6:44 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
Convenient AF.
Posted on 9/27/19 at 6:45 pm to BuzzSaw 12
Let's start with the tyrants.
Posted on 9/27/19 at 7:22 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
Posted on 9/27/19 at 7:41 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
Holy shite
Posted on 9/27/19 at 8:00 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
These last few years of corruption and lunacy are proof perfect that the 2nd ammendment is as necessary now as it ever was at the dawn of our republic. The people should always hold power over their government.
Page 4 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News