re: CIA Kept Soviet Cancer Research Classified for 64 Years

quote:

---

Is your contention that it is common knowledge that Ivermectin cures cancer, but because it’s cheap, this information is being suppressed?

---

My contention is that the CIA suppressed this cancer research for 64 years and that's a frickin fact. You can draw whatever conclusions you like from that. But it's also a frickin fact that anti-parasitics are a hell of a lot cheaper than chemotherapy and immunotherapy.

quote:

---

Any 8 year old can look at the prices of those treatments and see which ones are more profitable, dumbass

---

Buddy, do you understand the difference between a treatment and a cure? Multiple people in this thread, and you agreed with at least one of these posts, have argued that “no one wants to cure cancer bc it’s more profitable to treat it.”

quote:

---

Because pharmaceutical companies can’t make money if people are cured

---

quote:

---

Yep. Treating cancer is huge business.

---

Do you believe that to be the case? If so, yes—you and I both agree you are a simpleton.

quote:

---

What I find strange is these people come out of nowhere to attack as soon as these drugs are mentioned. I mean they big mad. Why are they so angry?

---

The guy that's in here now claims to be a doctor himself and note that he isn't shitting on the science either. Just the part about the money. He thinks he has a gotcha here, but he looks retarded. Because again, it's a fact that for whatever reason this research was suppressed for damn near 70 years and it's a lot cheaper than the other medicines we do use.

quote:

---

Didn’t the Dilbert guy test this theory?

---

The claim isn't being made that this is a cure. Instead, I've said that it has shown promise and that people should get with people who have experience treating cancer with these medicines because protocols will vary for different types of cancer. Also, I believe Scott Adams was late stage 4 and that the cancer had already spread to his bones before he began using ivermectin.

It's not going to work for everyone the same way every time. But it does show great promise as a treatment.

quote:

---

Ahh, the classic “but I know someone who took it and it cured them so it must work” schtick that completely disregards what current medical literature shows. Groundbreaking.

---

Double blinded, randomized placebo-controlled trials are nothing when compared to the anecdotal evidence of anonymous TD posters. It’s science bro.

quote:

---

The guy that's in here now claims to be a doctor himself and note that he isn't shitting on the science either.

---

My impression of America’s sick care system could not have been lower, or so I thought, after diving into the history of American’s government dietary guidelines in 2013-2014.

Then COVID came along and I believe most doctors are lunatics who cannot think or use common sense.

The insane backlash from anti parasitic medicine was a large bat signal.

quote:

---

Double blinded, randomized placebo-controlled trials are nothing when compared to the anecdotal evidence of anonymous TD posters. It’s science bro.

---

And notice now how the two shills jump onto the anecdotal story to try to make the thread about that instead of the science or the fact that the research was kept in the dark for 70 years.

These are common shill tactics being employed here. Nitpicking the thread to try and derail it and/or turn it into an argument they think they can win while ignoring the actual substance of the thread all together.

Both of these posters clearly have an agenda.

quote:

---

Of course I have an agenda.

---

Thanks for confirming for us.