- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: CIA Kept Soviet Cancer Research Classified for 64 Years
Posted on 3/9/26 at 7:33 pm to JasonDBlaha
Posted on 3/9/26 at 7:33 pm to JasonDBlaha
quote:
Neither of those have significant clinical evidence to back their effectiveness as cancer treatment.
Maybe you missed the title of the thread. "The CIA Kept Soviet Cancer Research Classified for 64 Years."
Maybe we would be farther along the process on it if it hasn't been kept in the dark for 70 fricking years, eh? We now know that anti-parasitics show promise as cancer fighting drugs and there are multiple studies and at least one clinical trial underway for the drugs as we speak.
This post was edited on 3/9/26 at 7:36 pm
0
Posted on 3/9/26 at 7:35 pm to Freauxzen
quote:
Dude. People kill relatives and friends for money and power frequently. Like all of the time.
Sure man, but your ilk is positing a conspiracy involving hundreds of people who all - ALL - somehow got convinced to risk their relatives’ lives and their own. That’s batshit crazy!
Posted on 3/9/26 at 7:36 pm to AlterEd
Posted on 3/9/26 at 7:39 pm to Kjnstkmn
Yeah, I wasn't sure if I wanted to drop the Q posts dealing with cancer in this one or not.
The shills are already out in force against it as it is. Kinda strange though, people weren't really talking about fenbendazole and ivermectin before Q came along, were they?
The shills are already out in force against it as it is. Kinda strange though, people weren't really talking about fenbendazole and ivermectin before Q came along, were they?
Posted on 3/9/26 at 7:42 pm to AlterEd
Posted on 3/9/26 at 7:43 pm to AlterEd
But since we have already gone there now:
quote:
"The CIA Kept Soviet Cancer Research Classified for 64 Years"
Posted on 3/9/26 at 8:10 pm to AlterEd
While we are on the subject, and since people asked, here is a peer reviewed paper for a protocol based on preclinical data.
Worth looking into for those who may be being affected by this horrible disease.
Worth looking into for those who may be being affected by this horrible disease.
Posted on 3/9/26 at 8:11 pm to ChanceOfRainIsNever
quote:
Because pharmaceutical companies can’t make money if people are cured
Congrats for being a dumbass with a single digit IQ.
Posted on 3/9/26 at 8:15 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Yeah, nobody would pay for a cancer cure
Imagine being dumb enough to think a cure for something like diabetes wouldn’t be profitable…yet alone cancer
Posted on 3/9/26 at 8:18 pm to idlewatcher
quote:
It benefits big pharma not to cure people. At least not immediately. It's the perfect grift.
Posted on 3/9/26 at 8:24 pm to SlowFlowPro
Idiot. Guess you never have heard of class action lawsuits against pharmaceutical companies that push toxins on the populace. I’m sure some of the doctors prescribing such things went to medical school…
Ever heard of Thalidomide? Christ, you really are an insufferable, closed minded fool.
BTW, did you take the COVID vaccine?
Ever heard of Thalidomide? Christ, you really are an insufferable, closed minded fool.
BTW, did you take the COVID vaccine?
Posted on 3/9/26 at 8:29 pm to Sizzle_DAWG
Notice how he stopped pretending to be a doctor and left the thread when an actual doctor came in and didn't shite on the thread. He's the most disingenuous piece of shite on this board. He lies constantly.
Posted on 3/9/26 at 8:38 pm to AlterEd
quote:
Yep. Treating cancer is huge business.
And curing cancer wouldn’t be?
Legit simpleton.
Posted on 3/9/26 at 8:38 pm to Penrod
quote:
Because they wanted their relatives and friends, who would inevitably get cancer, to die rather than be cured?
Someone with an inability to think for themselves might ask this question. The rest of us realize that just because one person has knowledge, doesn’t mean that they necessarily have to share it with outsiders. Especially if there’s big money involved.
Posted on 3/9/26 at 8:42 pm to FoTownBam
quote:
Especially if there’s big money involved.
And big money isn’t involved in being first to market with a “cancer cure?”
quote:
Someone with an inability to think for themselves
Look in the mirror
Posted on 3/9/26 at 8:44 pm to onmymedicalgrind
quote:
And big money isn’t involved in being first to market with a “cancer cure?”
Go check the prices on Ivermectin and get back to me
Posted on 3/9/26 at 8:45 pm to onmymedicalgrind
quote:
And curing cancer wouldn’t be?
Fenbendazole: 300-600 dollars per year
Chemotherapy: 10,000-48,000 dollars per year
Immunotherapy: 100,000-200,000 dollars per year
Maybe I'm too much of a "legit simpleton" to understand which treatment methods make more money.
Posted on 3/9/26 at 8:45 pm to AlterEd
We actually agree on something Ed haha
Posted on 3/9/26 at 8:46 pm to Sizzle_DAWG
Posted on 3/9/26 at 8:48 pm to AlterEd
quote:
Maybe I'm too much of a "legit simpleton" to understand
Well said.
Page 6 of 16
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News