- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Score Board
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- SEC Score Board
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: CIA and Pfizer knew Covid herd immunity was rapidly occurring in May of 2020
Posted on 9/2/26 at 1:12 pm to Lawyered
Posted on 9/2/26 at 1:12 pm to Lawyered
quote:
Under the guise of it was 95-99% effective and President Biden saying if you got the jab you wouldn’t get Covid
Which was a huge lie. And further shots and their interest went off a cliff. What’s the point of getting the jab if it didn’t even stop you from getting the covid anyway with a 99.999% survival rate if you were remotely healthy.
They ruined all goodwill they had by lying to the population. And then wonder why nobody trusts them anymore
Sir, this is a Wendy's. I.e, this was part of dialog talking about Sweden's response to the pandemic.
0
Posted on 9/2/26 at 1:15 pm to Bass Tiger
Of course they did. The COVID response became an experiment in propaganda, population control, and mass formation psychosis.
Posted on 9/2/26 at 1:18 pm to Stat M Repairman
quote:
Talked to somebody last weekend who insisted on vaccinating their teenage son back in '21. Tried to reason with 'em.
Told them there no emergency that justifies that level of risk for a healthy kid, and to just wait and see what plays out.
He's got an appointment with a cardiologist next week.
Both parents are doctors.
Trust "The Science," and don't be such a MAGA "science denier!" Or an "election denier!"
Posted on 9/2/26 at 1:18 pm to dgnx6
quote:
Diamond Princess
Yeah, that was among the first real-world Petry dishes. It showed that it was primarily the old that died and that some people already had some immunity.
A German study found that people who had had one of the "common cold" versions of covid had some immunity.
Posted on 9/2/26 at 1:20 pm to SparkyWilson
quote:
quote:
Sweden went for herd immunity as did America's Amish. They both worked out better than covidians.
For Sweden, they attempted it, yes and had to pull back on it. By December 2020 they had instituted stricter measures and recommended wearing face masks and shutting down non-essential public services.
Sweden's head government virologist stayed the course on no lockdowns and social distancing, except for nursing homes and the elderly. And he and Sweden took massive shite from other countries liberal biased media and globalist leaders and doctors.
This post was edited on 9/2/26 at 1:21 pm
Posted on 9/2/26 at 1:22 pm to Purple Spoon
and you know why they did it? They got rich off of it, especially fauchi......and big pharma. That's why they started pushing the jab for the very young, who literally were in no danger. At the time I had very liberal in-laws (the type that bow down due to their white guilt) and they were excited that their small kids got the shot. Just absolutely disgusting.
Posted on 9/2/26 at 1:24 pm to BTROleMisser
quote:
Sweden's head government virologist stayed the course on no lockdowns and social distancing, except for nursing homes and the elderly. And he and Sweden took massive shite from other countries liberal biased media and globalist leaders and doctors.
They did indeed take a lot of shite from countries with much worse outcomes.
DeSantis in Florida did his homework and ultimately followed a far less restrictive path. He did the opposite of what Cuomo did in NY.
Posted on 9/2/26 at 1:37 pm to BTROleMisser
quote:
Sweden's head government virologist stayed the course on no lockdowns and social distancing, except for nursing homes and the elderly. And he and Sweden took massive shite from other countries liberal biased media and globalist leaders and doctors.
You're not looking at all the facts. Yes, they did not institute a nationwide lockdown, but they introduced several limiting measures over the course of 2020 to 2022.
A short summary from Copilot:
quote:
Sweden did not implement a nationwide COVID-19 lockdown. Instead, the government relied on voluntary social distancing, remote work, travel reduction, and targeted restrictions on gatherings, education, and public venues. While some sectors faced limits and temporary closures, Sweden generally kept schools, businesses, and society more open than most European countries during the pandemic.
This is mainly to explore the notion that Sweden went for herd immunity with minimal restrictions. Again, they tried, and then chose to introduce more measures as time went on, and vaccination became a major element of their strategy once it became available:
quote:
From 2021 onward, Sweden regarded vaccination as the primary medical tool for controlling the impact of COVID-19, particularly severe disease and deaths. However, it was used alongside other measures such as recommendations on social distancing, work-from-home guidance, gathering limits, and targeted restrictions rather than as a stand-alone strategy.
They were not minimalist in their strategy even though they relied on high voluntary participation.
Posted on 9/2/26 at 4:19 pm to Tigertittie
Emotional lashout without any facts. Typical poliboard. It's why normal people usually avoid this board regardless of their ideology.
Posted on 9/2/26 at 4:58 pm to Jim Rockford
quote:
Emotional lashout without any facts. Typical poliboard. It's why normal people usually avoid this board regardless of their ideology.
The facts have been listed on this board repeatedly... for years.
You idiots chose to believe the experts despite logic and common sense and all sorts of facts shoved in your face daily.
Just take one... horse paste? Seriously? They vilified a Nobel Prize winning drug to force you fools to experiment on yourselves. And lo and behold now we know Ivermectin actually works.
Works so fricking good in fact we could have saved more lives if we had just given the whole world a daily dose of Ivermectin during the pandemic.
And as for the name calling, I'm way beyond giving a frick, after what you idiots put those of us who were smart enough to not take the vaccine through.
frick all of you.
This post was edited on 9/2/26 at 5:00 pm
Posted on 9/2/26 at 5:09 pm to Pedropatterstine
quote:
and you know why they did it? They got rich off of it, especially fauchi......and big pharma. That's why they started pushing the jab for the very young, who literally were in no danger. At the time I had very liberal in-laws (the type that bow down due to their white guilt) and they were excited that their small kids got the shot. Just absolutely disgusting.
Once Trump declared Operation Warp Speed along with the $20-30 billion that was allocated for various drug companies to develop the Covid-19 jabs, well, there was no turning back and the dash for the money began.
Posted on 9/2/26 at 5:43 pm to SparkyWilson
“RNA viruses mutate often and easily which is why those who’ve had the virus or the vaccine can still contract it and pass it on to others”
A virologist that I followed ,Dr.Geert Vanden Bosch wrote an open letter to the CDC admonishing them not to mass vaccinate during the Omicron phase of the pandemic.Point he made was that RNA viruses have a propensity to mutate,mass vaccinations would accelerate the rate of mutations.Another point he made was that as viruses mutate they usually become less virulent but with accelerated mutations it was possible that a more virulent,deadly variant might arise.
A virologist that I followed ,Dr.Geert Vanden Bosch wrote an open letter to the CDC admonishing them not to mass vaccinate during the Omicron phase of the pandemic.Point he made was that RNA viruses have a propensity to mutate,mass vaccinations would accelerate the rate of mutations.Another point he made was that as viruses mutate they usually become less virulent but with accelerated mutations it was possible that a more virulent,deadly variant might arise.
Posted on 9/2/26 at 6:05 pm to Purple Spoon
The people that downvoted this post should be named publicly, tarred and feathered, citizenship revoked and sent to Canada. You, sir, are speaking truth.
Posted on 9/2/26 at 6:05 pm to Bass Tiger
quote:
CIA and Pfizer knew Covid herd immunity was rapidly occurring in May of 2020
Anyone with the ability to think knew this too. You don’t have to have worked for a certain company or have a certain degree
Posted on 9/2/26 at 6:09 pm to Bass Tiger
They made us stay 6 feet apart, wear masks and isolate to slow the herd immunity. Sick puppies.
Posted on 9/2/26 at 6:18 pm to Hangover Haven
“Frick Pfizer…I use to think they were a respectable company because of Zithromax”
Drug companies develop some very good drugs,even life saving but I think they all have their corrupt side at the same time.
Pfizer had a drug they promoted-Bextra(NSAID for arthritis) that caused strokes and heart attacks.Pfizer knew it beforehand ,FDA found out,took it off market and fined them 2.5 billion.They spent another couple billion settling lawsuits.
Merck had a similar drug-Vioxx same issue,they were fined 4 billion.
Eli Lilly came out with a drug-Xigris that was supposed to significantly reduce death from sepsis.It was actually useless,after 10 years it was taken off the market but they had made over a billion dollars at $8,000 a dose.
Lot of people in the medical profession won’t take a drug until after it’s been on the market at least 5 years.
That’s why I didn’t take the Covid shot, a vaccine developed with new technology,I wasn’t about to take it.People that bugged me to take it I told them I wasn’t about to be a Guinea pig for Pfizer.If they wanted to,be my guest.
Drug companies develop some very good drugs,even life saving but I think they all have their corrupt side at the same time.
Pfizer had a drug they promoted-Bextra(NSAID for arthritis) that caused strokes and heart attacks.Pfizer knew it beforehand ,FDA found out,took it off market and fined them 2.5 billion.They spent another couple billion settling lawsuits.
Merck had a similar drug-Vioxx same issue,they were fined 4 billion.
Eli Lilly came out with a drug-Xigris that was supposed to significantly reduce death from sepsis.It was actually useless,after 10 years it was taken off the market but they had made over a billion dollars at $8,000 a dose.
Lot of people in the medical profession won’t take a drug until after it’s been on the market at least 5 years.
That’s why I didn’t take the Covid shot, a vaccine developed with new technology,I wasn’t about to take it.People that bugged me to take it I told them I wasn’t about to be a Guinea pig for Pfizer.If they wanted to,be my guest.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 1:09 pm to SparkyWilson
quote:
Excess mortality
Anybody seen actuarial data from the big re-insurance companies in Zurich?
Seems like when it comes to excess mortality the buck stops there.
If any data is accurate on excess mortality it's gonna be that. Numbers tend get more accurate when there's real money involved.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 1:49 pm to LSUA 75
quote:
They spent another couple billion settling lawsuits.
Merck had a similar drug-Vioxx same issue,they were fined 4 billion.
My doctor was a cardiologist who was most upset that they took Vioxx off of the market. She had some patients for whom Vioxx was the only thing that worked. The result being that the ineffective alternatives resulted in patients becoming less physically active which was far, far worse than the very low risk the Vioxx studies alleged.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 5:00 pm to Bass Tiger
Seeing covid unfold was and is the true definition of fascism.
Page 3 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News