- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Christians who somehow thought it wasn’t Christianlike to vote for Trump
Posted on 9/10/25 at 6:02 pm to FooManChoo
Posted on 9/10/25 at 6:02 pm to FooManChoo
quote:
Again, it's about ultimate authority. The disciples of the Apostles taught as they did, and would have been (or should have been) held up to the same Scriptures that were available to the listeners.
What about the disciples of the disciples? When did the Church start to err? Specifically in the first millennium. We're on the same page wtt Rome post schism, so no need to waste your breath there.
quote:
You and others keep calling out Calvin. You do realize that the Reformation included many different people, right?
And yes and no; there better and worse shepherds (keepers) throughout history.
Simply because you're a Calvinist and hold to a classical reformed theology.
Posted on 9/10/25 at 6:03 pm to Champagne
quote:The office of Apostle perished with John.
The Gospel of Foo DECLARES for all time that once the last Apostle had died, no other human beings carried forth their "special office" despite the fact that Christ Himself told Peter: "Feel my sheep."
The authority to govern the Church passed on to the presbyters that were set up in each congregation, but that was not apostolic authority.
Also, Jesus showed mercy to Peter by recommissioning him to his office of Apostle, after he had betrayed his savior. All of the Apostles were charged with feeding and caring for the flock of Christ, and the elders commissioned to their office by the Apostles were charged with the same care, by Peter, no less (1 Peter 5:2).
quote:The elders were given authority to govern as undershepherds, but not to carry on an unbreaking chain of "apostolic succession" in the way that Rome states, with a bishop of Rome having absolute primacy.
I don't see anywhere in the Bible that the Apostles' special mission was over once the last Apostle died. In fact, the NT presents passages and evidence to indicate that Christ appointed Church leaders who would carry the special mission forward to the End of Time.
Posted on 9/10/25 at 6:06 pm to Knartfocker
quote:What about them? Sola scriptura is about the ultimate authority to correct and bind consciences residing with the Scriptures, the only standard that is described as "God-breathed". The elders of the churches that followed after the disciples of the Apostles were held to the same ultimate standard.
What about the disciples of the disciples?
quote:Before even the death of the Apostles. Paul's letters in particular have many corrections for the churches.
When did the Church start to err? Specifically in the first millennium.
quote:OK.
We're on the same page wtt Rome post schism, so no need to waste your breath there.
Posted on 9/10/25 at 6:07 pm to FooManChoo
quote:
The office of Apostle perished with John. The authority to govern the Church passed on to the presbyters that were set up in each congregation, but that was not apostolic authority. Also, Jesus showed mercy to Peter by recommissioning him to his office of Apostle, after he had betrayed
as his savior.
1st paragraph from the Book of Foomanchoo located in the Fiction section near Dungeons and Dragons.
Posted on 9/10/25 at 6:11 pm to TheDeerHunter
quote:1 Timothy 3 and Titus 1 follow after Acts 14, where elders were appointed in the churches. 1 Peter 5 gives a charge to those elders to shepherd the flock of Christ.
1st paragraph from the Book of Foomanchoo located in the Fiction section near Dungeons and Dragons.
If you'd like to respond with Scripture, go ahead, but so far all I keep seeing out of you is mockery.
Posted on 9/10/25 at 6:13 pm to FooManChoo
quote:
Church passed on to the presbyters that were set up in each congregation, but that was not apostolic authority.
The Greek word "presbyter" means "Priest" in English, so, Christ did indeed bequeath a Church hierarchy to us, and the ground floor of the hierarchy was the Priesthood. We know this because the Church started laying hands on and anointing presbyters/priests while Christ still walked the Earth.
So, we differ. You say that the authority of the Apostles died when the last Apostle died, but, I say that Christ appointed a Church hierarchy that carries the Apostles' mission to this day.
And this is necessary, I will add, because the OT tells us that the Sacrifice of the Todah is ordained by God to continue to the End of Time. The EOC/RCC both carry forth this Sacrifice in the Liturgy of the Eucharist.
So it is absolutely necessary for Christ to rely on Apostolic Succession to carry forth the obligation to continue the Sacrifice of the Todah/Eucharist, and this Sacrifice will continue to be present in Time and past, in Time, until the End of Time itself.
Go and be well, Foo.
This post was edited on 9/10/25 at 6:15 pm
Posted on 9/10/25 at 6:16 pm to FooManChoo
quote:
The office of Apostle perished with John
Using your argumentative approach…Scriptural source?
Posted on 9/10/25 at 6:18 pm to ErectileReptile
There’s no such thing as a liberal Christian. It’s an oxymoron.
Posted on 9/10/25 at 6:18 pm to FooManChoo
quote:
Before even the death of the Apostles. Paul's letters in particular have many corrections for the churches.
The Bible wasn't canonized until centuries after that. If the church was already in error, how do you know your Bible isn't corrupted?
Posted on 9/10/25 at 6:25 pm to Champagne
quote:No, it means "elder". The word episkopos means "overseer" or "bishop", and both words are used synonymously with one another (Acts 20).
The Greek word "presbyter" means "Priest" in English
"Priest" is hiereus in the Greek, and archiereus means "High Priest".
quote:Again, the elders/overseers were not priests.
so, Christ did indeed bequeath a Church hierarchy to us, and the ground floor of the hierarchy was the Priesthood. We know this because the Church started laying hands on and anointing presbyters/priests while Christ still walked the Earth.
quote:I don't see that from the Scriptures.
So, we differ. You say that the authority of the Apostles died when the last Apostle died, but, I say that Christ appointed a Church hierarchy that carries the Apostles' mission to this day.
quote:Where was the todah commanded to be observed for forever? The sacrifices of animals were perpetual, but ceased in the fulfillment of Christ's death on the cross as their fulfillment. The Eucharist is not the continuation of the todah. The Scriptures don't teach that it is.
And this is necessary, I will add, because the OT tells us that the Sacrifice of the Todah is ordained by God to continue to the End of Time. The EOC/RCC both carry forth this Sacrifice in the Liturgy of the Eucharist.
quote:This is a continual problem with Rome. She keeps going back to types and shadows.
So it is absolutely necessary for Christ to rely on Apostolic Succession to carry forth the obligation to continue the Sacrifice of the Todah/Eucharist, and this Sacrifice will continue to be present in Time and past, in Time, until the End of Time itself.
Posted on 9/10/25 at 6:30 pm to TheDeerHunter
quote:The office was foundational, not continuing (Eph. 2:20) and were either eye-witnesses to Christ's ministry (Acts 1:21–22; 1 Cor. 9:1), or were directly appointed by Christ, Himself (Luke 6:13; Acts 9:15; Gal. 1:1). They were also attested to by "signs and wonders" to prove their authority and office (2 Cor. 12:12).
Using your argumentative approach…Scriptural source?
Let me know once the American Pope performs miracles after revealing he has seen the risen Lord Jesus Christ
Posted on 9/10/25 at 6:31 pm to Knartfocker
quote:I believe God's promise is true that He will preserve His word (and has), and the historical evidence of the transmission of the text shows that it has been reliably preserved.
The Bible wasn't canonized until centuries after that. If the church was already in error, how do you know your Bible isn't corrupted?
Posted on 9/10/25 at 6:35 pm to FooManChoo
quote:
I believe God's promise is true that He will preserve His word (and has), and the historical evidence of the transmission of the text shows that it has been reliably preserved.
I should have clarified. The transmission of the various texts is a completely different and fascinating topic, but many non biblical books have been transmitted as well. My question should have been if the church was already in error, how do you know you have the right Bible?
Posted on 9/10/25 at 6:39 pm to FooManChoo
quote:
The office was foundational, not continuing (Eph. 2:20
Says no such thing! Ephesians was written by the APOSTLE St. Paul.
quote:
Let me know once the American Pope performs miracles after revealing he has seen the risen Lord Jesus Christ
You just make up word salads and are used to folks having the attention spans of dysfunctional canines…we’re on to your HERETICAL, BLASPHEMOUS screeds.
Stop lying dude.
Posted on 9/10/25 at 6:40 pm to Knartfocker
quote:Its the same answer I just gave.
I should have clarified. The transmission of the various texts is a completely different and fascinating topic, but many non biblical books have been transmitted as well. My question should have been if the church was already in error, how do you know you have the right Bible?
It’s the same response I would give if someone asked if Jesus knew the Old Testament Bible wasn’t corrupted just because the Pharisees and Jewish elders were corrupt.
Posted on 9/10/25 at 6:45 pm to TheDeerHunter
quote:Yes, it was written by the Apostle Paul. He said the church was being built upon the foundation of the prophets and apostles. The prophets have ceased and so have the apostles, for the reasons I gave. Care to address all of what I said on that front?
Says no such thing! Ephesians was written by the APOSTLE St. Paul.
quote:I’m not lying. I’m saying what I believe to be true.
You just make up word salads and are used to folks having the attention spans of dysfunctional canines…we’re on to your HERETICAL, BLASPHEMOUS screeds.
Stop lying dude.
If you would like to respond with Scripture instead of personal attacks and insults, I’d be happy to engage with that.
Posted on 9/10/25 at 6:48 pm to FooManChoo
quote:
She keeps going back to types and shadows.
We are simply keeping the Faith that we believe that Jesus Christ Himself handed down to us through his Church.
The Sacrifice of the Todah, say the Hebrews, is the only ancient sacrifice that will continue into the Messianic Age.
Posted on 9/10/25 at 6:49 pm to FooManChoo
quote:
Its the same answer I just gave.
So the normative authority for the canon is your belief?
Posted on 9/10/25 at 6:50 pm to Champagne
quote:Again, show me in the Scriptures where that is the case. Otherwise, you are allowing the traditions of men to govern the Bible, including non-Christian traditions.
We are simply keeping the Faith that we believe that Jesus Christ Himself handed down to us through his Church.
The Sacrifice of the Todah, say the Hebrews, is the only ancient sacrifice that will continue into the Messianic Age.
Posted on 9/10/25 at 6:51 pm to FooManChoo
quote:
f you would like to respond with Scripture instead of personal attacks and insults, I’d be happy to engage with that.
You’re intellectually disingenuous on purpose.
You keep saying to argue based on Scripture and when anyone provides Holy Scripture, YOU provide your own interpretation against.
That is the issue. Neither you nor I get to interpret Holy Scriptures as we see fit.
Furthermore, the Church interprets Holy Scriptures and not the Holy Scriptures that interpret the Church.
Jesus Christ founded His Church and that Church and its Holy Tradition determined what is and isn’t Holy Scripture - not the other away around.
Popular
Back to top


1




