Started By
Message
locked post

Christians get violent over McJesus

Posted on 1/16/19 at 9:43 am
Posted by chity
Chicago, Il
Member since Dec 2008
6080 posts
Posted on 1/16/19 at 9:43 am
McJesus causes riots

quote:

But not all of the rallies have been peaceful, officials say. Israeli police said rioters threw a firebomb and stones toward the museum late last week, wounding three officers, according to the AP. Authorities responded with tear gas and stun grenades.


This is a first in recent time as far as I know.
Posted by CoachChappy
Member since May 2013
32537 posts
Posted on 1/16/19 at 9:50 am to
This is exactly what the "artist" wanted. He go this name out there. Now, do one of Mohammed, pussy.
Posted by Esquire
Chiraq
Member since Apr 2014
11591 posts
Posted on 1/16/19 at 9:50 am to
quote:

Israeli police said rioters threw a firebomb and stones toward the museum late last week, wounding three officers, according to the AP. Authorities responded with tear gas and stun grenades.


The Jews don't take kindly to people mocking their greatest achievement
Posted by Eli Goldfinger
Member since Sep 2016
32785 posts
Posted on 1/16/19 at 9:51 am to
Will anyone put out a fatwa (or whatever it’s called) on the ‘artist’?
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
89516 posts
Posted on 1/16/19 at 9:51 am to
quote:

Now, do one of Mohammed, pussy.


Now, that would be edgy and courageous.

And by that I mean suicidal.
Posted by Vecchio Cane
Ivory Tower
Member since Jul 2016
17743 posts
Posted on 1/16/19 at 9:52 am to
John 18

10 Then Simon Peter, who had a sword, drew it and struck the high priest’s servant, cutting off his right ear. (The servant’s name was Malchus



It happens
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
89516 posts
Posted on 1/16/19 at 9:57 am to
As an aside - what makes this "edgy" and "artistic"?

I mean, I watched Last Temptation of Christ (full disclosure - I'm Christian). I get it. Casts Judas in a heroic light, has Jesus with all these conflicted feelings, but ultimately has Jesus do what Christians believe he did and left the rest for the viewer to interpret.

Still heresy and probably blasphemy, but I get the interesting twists and assumption challenging in the film's story.

But just this example (McJesus) and then going back to (I believe Maplethorpe's) crucifix in a fishbowl full of urine - other than the per se outrage it is trying to provoke, what's edgy or artistic about that? Just trying too hard, IMHO.

Again, why don't these artsy types try that with Islam if provoking outrage and poking fun at religious figures is so edgy and artistic?
This post was edited on 1/16/19 at 9:59 am
Posted by t00f
Not where you think I am
Member since Jul 2016
89824 posts
Posted on 1/16/19 at 10:00 am to
For those who didn't actually read the article it's Arab Christians that are pissed.
Posted by Cosmo
glassman's guest house
Member since Oct 2003
120260 posts
Posted on 1/16/19 at 10:02 am to
Is McDonalds OK with this?

Kinda seems like a trademark violation.
Posted by cwill
Member since Jan 2005
54752 posts
Posted on 1/16/19 at 10:10 am to
quote:

But just this example (McJesus) and then going back to (I believe Maplethorpe's) crucifix in a fishbowl full of urine - other than the per se outrage it is trying to provoke, what's edgy or artistic about that? Just trying too hard, IMHO.



I wouldn't compare this work to Maplethorpe...Maplethorpe was commenting on religion while this is a comment on consumerism using religious imagery (albeit hokey and been done before).
Posted by Cump11b
Member since Sep 2018
2026 posts
Posted on 1/16/19 at 10:21 am to
quote:

Is McDonalds OK with this?

Kinda seems like a trademark violation.



My guess would be a lawsuit would inflame feelings and cause people to sympathize with the artist instead of allowing the statute to die off into oblivion on its own. People against capitalism would make this is their rally symbol, thus associating the McDonalds brand worldwide with the negatives of capitalism. I don't see how McDonalds wins in this situation, and by win I do not mean in court. The pissed people in the middle east will torch it for them.
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
89516 posts
Posted on 1/16/19 at 10:28 am to
quote:

Maplethorpe was commenting on religion while this is a comment on consumerism using religious imagery (albeit hokey and been done before).


Same question - what's interesting or remotely artistic about it? Political or religious speech can't be, per se, artistic, IMHO.

I mean, Jesus fighting Santa in South Park is far more interesting than whatever this is. What's interesting about crucifying Ronald McDonald? What does that represent?

ETA: For that matter, crazy Sinead O'Connor tearing up a picture of the Pope and saying, "Fight the real enemy!" - I get that. I don't agree with it necessarily, but that has some sort of thought behind it.

If you depicted a crucified fat person on the Golden Arches? I get that. I understand that.

This I don't get. Help me out.
This post was edited on 1/16/19 at 10:29 am
Posted by klrstix
Shreveport, LA
Member since Oct 2006
3206 posts
Posted on 1/16/19 at 10:40 am to
(no message)
Posted by klrstix
Shreveport, LA
Member since Oct 2006
3206 posts
Posted on 1/16/19 at 10:43 am to
quote:

Now, do one of Mohammed...


While not commonly known, I think Islam recognizes Jesus as a Prophet/Teacher but not (as the Christian Faith does..) Only begotten Son/Savior...


So it is not implausible that the stone throwing was not from "Christians"...

Posted by Boatshoes
Member since Dec 2017
6775 posts
Posted on 1/16/19 at 10:51 am to
quote:

While not commonly known, I think Islam recognizes Jesus as a Prophet/Teacher but not (as the Christian Faith does..) Only begotten Son/Savior... So it is not implausible that the stone throwing was not from "Christians"...


That's what I was suspecting as well. That Christians are upset over the Ronald McDonald doll, Mohammedans are upset about the presence of a crucifix in Dar-Al-Islam.

That having been said, Christianity isn't a religion of pacifism. The difference between violence engaged in by Christianity and Islam is that the former is universally provoked, defensive, and not intended to spread the faith or invade new territory. Isalmic violence is unprovoked, offensive, and intended to invade new territory.
This post was edited on 1/16/19 at 10:53 am
Posted by FooManChoo
Member since Dec 2012
41670 posts
Posted on 1/16/19 at 11:21 am to
"Arab Christians". Sounds like a cultural problem that has crept into the faith.

Christians should not turn to violence over such things.
Posted by klrstix
Shreveport, LA
Member since Oct 2006
3206 posts
Posted on 1/16/19 at 12:00 pm to
quote:

Christians should not turn to violence over such things.




As A Christian... I agree completely!
Posted by Snipe
Member since Nov 2015
10914 posts
Posted on 1/16/19 at 12:14 pm to
These idiots gone mess around and push these Christians to far.

It seems a lot of these people done forgot that them Christians tend to go off when they are pushed and start killing everyone..

Read your history cuz..
Posted by Dead End
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2013
21237 posts
Posted on 1/16/19 at 12:56 pm to
quote:

Now, do one of Mohammed, pussy.


I wouldn't count on that.
Posted by narddogg81
Vancouver
Member since Jan 2012
19695 posts
Posted on 1/16/19 at 1:02 pm to
Acting more like Muslims. Assuming the left is going to whole heartedly embrace them now
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram