Started By
Message

‘Certainly intimidation’: Louisiana sues EPA for emails of journalists and ‘Cancer Alley’

Posted on 2/2/24 at 9:50 am
Posted by 4cubbies
Member since Sep 2008
49995 posts
Posted on 2/2/24 at 9:50 am
Louisiana’s far-right government has quietly obtained hundreds of pages of communications between the Environmental Protection Agency and journalists, legal advocates and community groups focused on environmental justice. The rare use of public records law to target citizens is a new escalation in the state’s battle with the EPA over its examination of alleged civil rights violations in the heavily polluted region known as “Cancer Alley”. Louisiana’s far-right government has quietly obtained hundreds of pages of communications between the Environmental Protection Agency and journalists, legal advocates and community groups focused on environmental justice. The rare use of public records law to target citizens is a new escalation in the state’s battle with the EPA over its examination of alleged civil rights violations in the heavily polluted region known as “Cancer Alley”.

Louisiana sued the EPA on 19 December, alleging that the federal agency had failed to properly respond to the state’s sprawling Freedom of Information Act, or FOIA, request sent by former state attorney general Jeff Landry.

Court filings note that the public records case is related to another, ongoing lawsuit brought against the EPA by Landry, a staunch advocate for the oil and gas industry who now serves as Louisiana’s governor. Shortly after Landry’s suit was filed, the EPA dropped its investigation into the Louisiana department of environmental quality’s permitting practices, which advocates say disproportionately impact Black residents in Cancer Alley.

News that the state has sought to obtain such an array of communications as part of its efforts prompted allegations of intimidation from many of the Black residents who were targeted. It has also raised press freedom concerns for media organizations included in the request, described by FOIA experts as extremely unusual.

“The Louisiana attorney general’s office protects industry more than they protect the people,” said Sharon Lavigne, a resident of St James parish who has long fought industrial proliferation in her community, and whose emails were targeted in the request. “Maybe that’s why they got all of these emails, just to see what we’re doing and to see how they can stop us.”

Landry filed the request on 29 June 2023, just one day after the EPA announced it was dropping its Cancer Alley civil rights investigation.

The request seeks all records since March 2021 regarding “environmental justice in Louisiana, the Industrial Corridor in Louisiana”, and “the area called Cancer Alley”. It lists six advocates by name, all of whom are Black, as well as the organizations Rise St James, The Deep South Center for Environmental Justice, and several other community and law groups who have represented Cancer Alley residents.

Due to the expansive nature of the request, the EPA said it would take more than a year to locate and provide all the records. Louisiana then sued to compel the agency to move more quickly.

The Louisiana attorney general’s office declined to answer questions from the Guardian and the Intercept over why it had requested such information, but filings in its FOIA lawsuit accuse the EPA of “prodigiously leaking information to the press” and allowing environmental advocacy groups to hold undue influence on decisions.

An environmental law group said the AG’s accusations of external influence were hypocritical, noting that Landry’s office previously hired petrochemical lawyers to represent the state in its negotiations with the EPA. Those same lawyers were simultaneously representing one of the companies at the center of the EPA’s civil rights investigation, the Taiwanese petrochemical giant Formosa.

Landry’s request specifically seeks records containing mention of Formosa, as well as the Japanese firm Denka. Both companies are at the heart of ongoing campaigns and litigation in the region. Lavigne’s group, Rise St James, has been instrumental in thus far stopping Formosa from building a massive, multibillion dollar plastics plant in their parish. A Louisiana appeals court recently reinstated Formosa’s air permits, overturning a 2022 ruling.

The request also asks for emails with national and local media including MSNBC, the Washington Post and the Advocate, specifying nine journalists by name.

The co-author of this article, the Guardian’s Oliver Laughland, was one of the named journalists. “We are deeply concerned by what appears to be an attempt to intimidate journalists and interfere with their ability to report on alarming matters of environmental injustice – in particular, the dangerous toxicity of air in predominantly Black areas of Louisiana,” said Guardian US general counsel Kai Falkenberg.

“FOIA is an essential tool for informing the public on the workings of government, but in this case, we’re concerned that the state of Louisiana is abusing that law to prevent reporters from engaging in newsgathering on matters of public interest to readers in Louisiana and around the world.”

The EPA declined to answer questions from the Guardian and the Intercept, citing litigation, but it provided the 940 pages of documents already handed to the Louisiana justice department. Further releases are scheduled for 2 February.

The documents, many of which were heavily redacted, contain typical requests for comment from several journalists, internal EPA discussions over drafting and scheduling, and EPA exchanges with environmental lawyers and nonprofits, including a list of the attendees at a meeting of leading Cancer Alley advocates.

Public records law in the US dictates that, with certain exemptions, communications by or with local, state and federal employees must be made available to the public. The law is intended to preserve government transparency.

David Cuillier, director of the Freedom of Information Project, said that requests for communications between the government and citizens – including journalists – are not uncommon. But those requests are typically made by other journalists, law groups, or members of the public – not state governments.

“It’s totally weird and rare for a government agency to request, one, records from another agency, and, two, all the communications about these advocates and citizens and journalists,” Cuillier said.

LINK

TLDR Landry wasting state resources to go after journalists who dared to investigate Cancer Alley under his reign as AG.
This post was edited on 2/2/24 at 9:52 am
Posted by bernermountaindog
Member since Jan 2024
130 posts
Posted on 2/2/24 at 9:52 am to
quote:

Louisiana’s far-right government

Lmfao
Posted by Indefatigable
Member since Jan 2019
26070 posts
Posted on 2/2/24 at 9:52 am to
quote:

It’s totally weird and rare for a government agency to request, one, records from another agency

No, it absolutely is not.

This post was edited on 2/2/24 at 9:52 am
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
118689 posts
Posted on 2/2/24 at 9:54 am to
quote:

in the heavily polluted region known as “Cancer Alley”



What are the pollutants?

Name the chemical name and concentrations discovered please. This needs to be established to make this claim as "polluted".
Posted by 4cubbies
Member since Sep 2008
49995 posts
Posted on 2/2/24 at 9:58 am to
quote:

Name the chemical name and concentrations discovered please. This needs to be established to make this claim as "polluted".




No prollution to see here.
Posted by Sailjuggernaut
Member since Jan 2024
64 posts
Posted on 2/2/24 at 10:00 am to
quote:

Louisiana’s far-right government


The second I read this I looked at the poster and determined this wasn't worth even reading.
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
118689 posts
Posted on 2/2/24 at 10:00 am to
If the "environmentalists" can demonstrate that the region is "polluted" you know how much of a slam dunk case this is? It's Shaq level slam dunk.

Show the constituent concentrations and compare them to EPA regulated thresholds.
Posted by Sweep Da Leg
Member since Sep 2013
902 posts
Posted on 2/2/24 at 10:00 am to
quote:

What are the pollutants? Name the chemical name and concentrations discovered please. This needs to be established to make this claim as "polluted".


Exactly. Funny how no one heard of the study done by the environmental wackos groups that found out that “cancer alley” was bullshite
Posted by Turbeauxdog
Member since Aug 2004
23156 posts
Posted on 2/2/24 at 10:00 am to
quote:

environmental justice


Imagine taking an article with this terminology seriously.
Posted by G2160
houston
Member since May 2013
1749 posts
Posted on 2/2/24 at 10:01 am to
What do you think is coming out of those stacks?
Posted by Turbeauxdog
Member since Aug 2004
23156 posts
Posted on 2/2/24 at 10:02 am to
quote:

No prollution to see here.


It isn't moron, that's steam.
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
118689 posts
Posted on 2/2/24 at 10:03 am to
quote:

No prollution to see here.


Haha, that is literally 55% CO2 and 45% condensing water vapor (by weight) from the stacks and 100% condensing water vapor slightly above the ground.
Posted by Turbeauxdog
Member since Aug 2004
23156 posts
Posted on 2/2/24 at 10:03 am to
quote:

What do you think is coming out of those stacks?


She thinks refineries make money by burning the product they could sell.

Posted by cwill
Member since Jan 2005
54752 posts
Posted on 2/2/24 at 10:04 am to
quote:

Louisiana’s far-right government


Posted by lsutiger90
Cottage Grove, Houston, TX
Member since May 2004
1012 posts
Posted on 2/2/24 at 10:05 am to
Steam kills ??
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
118689 posts
Posted on 2/2/24 at 10:06 am to
quote:

She thinks refineries make money by burning the product they could sell.


Look, there are impurities that escape these processes however the refineries are so regulated they have scrubbing systems that clean the emissions. All this is monitored and reported to EPA on the regular.
Posted by Indefatigable
Member since Jan 2019
26070 posts
Posted on 2/2/24 at 10:12 am to
quote:

What do you think is coming out of those stacks?

Cancer, duh. Black people cancer in particular.
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
98529 posts
Posted on 2/2/24 at 10:12 am to
No bias at all in that "report"

Public records laws swing both ways and if EPA was (and we know they were because they have been for decades) colluding with journalists and "environmental justice" groups to try to interfere with a state's REVENUE (because that's what this is really about), State of LA has an obligation to look into it.
Posted by Cuz413
Member since Nov 2007
7243 posts
Posted on 2/2/24 at 10:15 am to
quote:

No prollution to see here.


Aside from elevated levels of flaring, you won't visibly see air pollution, plants pay for people to walk around with VOC meters to inspect pump seals, valve packing, valve drains and other identified sources in an effort to reduce emissions.

Water discharge and ground water contamination are something else.
Posted by imjustafatkid
Alabama
Member since Dec 2011
50316 posts
Posted on 2/2/24 at 10:16 am to
quote:

4cubbies


DR:DV
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram