re: CDC buried its own internal study showing a 1135% increase in autism risk from Hep B jab

That's actually a fair illustration of the point. Where do you think I get my inflated sense of understanding from but my information environment? Folks here point out all the time that libs trust the wrong sources designed to mislead them - right?

AI their in lies the problem, AI.no doubt has some benefits in the right hands, where does AI get all this all powerful knowledge from? It has no brain, some evil people are all in AI what is gonna destroy humanity 1st AI or man

MAN that's who

The ‘vaccines cause autism’ conspiracies are… true.

Inconceivable.

quote:

---

The claim of a Hep B vaccine-autism link is often promoted by anti-vaccine advocates who misrepresent the scientific literature. These claims rely on faulty interpretations of data or cherry-picked information, ignoring the vast body of evidence that contradicts them.

---

This is what somebody that would hide information for 75yrs might say. Or a group that eliminated part of the shots received category to better massage the data.

Don't forget, within the last few weeks the news was reporting that the covid shots had to update their info on myo/peri carditis risks. Looong after any young person that was going to get it already got it.

quote:

---

In summary, there is no credible scientific evidence to support the claim that the CDC buried a study showing a 1135% increase in autism risk from the Hep B vaccine or any other vaccine. The vast majority of research on vaccine safety and autism has found no link between the two.

---

No credible evidence... I've heard THAT one before.

Also, they worded that funny. No credible SCIENTIFIC evidence that it causes exactly a 1135% increase... does that mean maybe there IS an increase, just not 1135%?

Only the vast majority of research supposedly debunks it... does that mean there is research that supports it?

Very interesting language if you read between the lines.

AI can only tell you what is published dude. If something is hidden like the claim says, then AI isn't going to be able to pull it up. Are you stuck on stupid?

This is true and add on top that it's a commercial product designed to keep you using it, like social media, so it will go out of its way to kiss your arse if it can. That being said, when you ask it about decades-old CT's that are molding like old cheese, it's going to tell you and why and then yes, you can use your critical faculties, but with ideas that are ideological commitments like vaccine attitudes are increasingly becoming, this is hard to do without engaging tribal reasoning and finding reasons why your cherry-picked evidence is more compelling that the more voluminous info that goes against your conviction.

some from blood transfusion (in the era before blood screening) and exposure to body fluids among household contacts, day care.

Research funded by big pharma that is not able to be duplicated making them bullshite. Just wait. That’s what RFK is bringing back. Gold standard science where trials must be able to be duplicated by multiple researchers.