Started By
Message

re: CDC admits pcr test can't tell covid from flu

Posted on 12/27/21 at 10:27 pm to
Posted by TigerCoon
Member since Nov 2005
22466 posts
Posted on 12/27/21 at 10:27 pm to
You're trying to reason with a devout Covidian.
Posted by Blitzed
Member since Oct 2009
22010 posts
Posted on 12/27/21 at 10:29 pm to
quote:

You're trying to reason with a devout Covidian.


I know. I just feel bad for em ya know. If I can just wake one up...maybe it will make a difference.
Posted by WaWaWeeWa
Member since Oct 2015
15714 posts
Posted on 12/27/21 at 10:37 pm to
quote:

does it come back with a Covid/Flu/NotSick answer? or does it just come back with just a Sick/NotSick answer?? so that the BigPharm/MSM/DEM cabal could call it COVID??


It’s not one test. It’s one sample that multiple tests are run on. For the longest time we have had “respiratory panels” that take one swab and test for about 10 different viruses. This is pre COVID.


These test for COVID and flu separately.
Results say:

COVID - negative
Flu - positive

Or Vice versa. I wish y’all would let this go, it’s really silly and there is enough other nonsense out there to focus on.
Posted by Mickey Goldmill
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2010
26370 posts
Posted on 12/27/21 at 10:38 pm to
Wake one up to what? What am I devout about?
Posted by 2020_reVISION
Richmond,VA
Member since Dec 2020
3289 posts
Posted on 12/27/21 at 11:01 pm to
quote:

quote:
Dude what?

You want to try and provide a link to even substantiate that silly take??

It’s explained in the cdc link I was just replying to. They’ve switched to a single test for both Covid and flu. So naturally, this board takes that as some huge conspiracy or reveal.


It was. This was no anomaly. The fact that deception & the manipulation of data has been their M.O., the withdrawal of the EUA application for a test they knew couldn't distinguish between the same 2 "bugs" it now tests for sure as hell doesn't warrant an "Attaboy"
Posted by BigJim
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2010
14982 posts
Posted on 12/27/21 at 11:04 pm to
This old garbage…
Posted by Mickey Goldmill
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2010
26370 posts
Posted on 12/27/21 at 11:05 pm to
quote:

the withdrawal of the EUA application for a test they knew couldn't distinguish between the same 2 "bugs"


(Sigh)
Posted by Ripley
Member since Aug 2016
4583 posts
Posted on 12/27/21 at 11:13 pm to
Press release from July 2021
LINK

Posted by Mickey Goldmill
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2010
26370 posts
Posted on 12/27/21 at 11:20 pm to
Yes, that’s already been posted here. It doesn’t say what many on here think it does.
Posted by WaWaWeeWa
Member since Oct 2015
15714 posts
Posted on 12/27/21 at 11:26 pm to
“Such assays can facilitate CONTINUED testing for both influenza and sars-cov2 and can save both time and resources…”

Can you not see they are trying to combine the tests into one to save time and resources? It specifically says that’s the goal. They are saying it’s a combined method that can differentiate the flu and COVID so you don’t have to test for them separately.

Some of y’all lack reading comprehension that’s the real problem here
Posted by WaWaWeeWa
Member since Oct 2015
15714 posts
Posted on 12/27/21 at 11:29 pm to
They don’t say anywhere that the old test can’t differentiate flu and COVID

They are just reassuring you that the new test can differentiate because it’s a combined test.

I can’t believe I’m arguing with someone about this
This post was edited on 12/27/21 at 11:29 pm
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
125636 posts
Posted on 12/27/21 at 11:29 pm to
Eh. It’s a big misunderstanding and then it’s true.

That’s the Covid pattern.

I don’t discount anything anymore.
Posted by dgnx6
Member since Feb 2006
86314 posts
Posted on 12/27/21 at 11:35 pm to
quote:

Nope


Just because your beliefs come crashing down don’t continue to be a bitch about it. Wisen up and help others fix this.

Posted by Mickey Goldmill
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2010
26370 posts
Posted on 12/27/21 at 11:44 pm to
Didn’t bitch about anything. This OP has been shown countless times to be incorrect nonsense.
Posted by Ripley
Member since Aug 2016
4583 posts
Posted on 12/27/21 at 11:44 pm to

And to add icing on this cake - it’s also NOT FDA approved. Just “authorized” under emergency measures.



frick these people.
Posted by Mickey Goldmill
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2010
26370 posts
Posted on 12/27/21 at 11:54 pm to
1. The old tests were also not FDA approved. They were also being used under EUA.
2. Does that really matter to some of y’all? After all, the vaccines are now FDA approved and that didn’t change anyones mind on here about them.
Posted by WaWaWeeWa
Member since Oct 2015
15714 posts
Posted on 12/28/21 at 12:06 am to
quote:

And to add icing on this cake - it’s also NOT FDA approved. Just “authorized” under emergency measures


What does this prove?

Are you saying COVID doesn’t exist?

Why don’t you stop beating around the bush and be very specific.
Posted by SDVTiger
Cabo San Lucas
Member since Nov 2011
93937 posts
Posted on 12/28/21 at 12:06 am to
quote:

Mickey Goldmill


Posted by Vandergriff
Member since Nov 2020
1502 posts
Posted on 12/28/21 at 12:21 am to
And yet big pharma has full immunity against any consequences. Why is that?
Posted by Mickey Goldmill
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2010
26370 posts
Posted on 12/28/21 at 12:21 am to
I think my screen name is pretty funny too
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram