- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 12/27/21 at 10:29 pm to TigerCoon
quote:
You're trying to reason with a devout Covidian.
I know. I just feel bad for em ya know. If I can just wake one up...maybe it will make a difference.
Posted on 12/27/21 at 10:37 pm to ChineseBandit58
quote:
does it come back with a Covid/Flu/NotSick answer? or does it just come back with just a Sick/NotSick answer?? so that the BigPharm/MSM/DEM cabal could call it COVID??
It’s not one test. It’s one sample that multiple tests are run on. For the longest time we have had “respiratory panels” that take one swab and test for about 10 different viruses. This is pre COVID.
These test for COVID and flu separately.
Results say:
COVID - negative
Flu - positive
Or Vice versa. I wish y’all would let this go, it’s really silly and there is enough other nonsense out there to focus on.
Posted on 12/27/21 at 10:38 pm to Blitzed
Wake one up to what? What am I devout about?
Posted on 12/27/21 at 11:01 pm to Mickey Goldmill
quote:
quote:
Dude what?
You want to try and provide a link to even substantiate that silly take??
It’s explained in the cdc link I was just replying to. They’ve switched to a single test for both Covid and flu. So naturally, this board takes that as some huge conspiracy or reveal.
It was. This was no anomaly. The fact that deception & the manipulation of data has been their M.O., the withdrawal of the EUA application for a test they knew couldn't distinguish between the same 2 "bugs" it now tests for sure as hell doesn't warrant an "Attaboy"
Posted on 12/27/21 at 11:05 pm to 2020_reVISION
quote:
the withdrawal of the EUA application for a test they knew couldn't distinguish between the same 2 "bugs"
(Sigh)
Posted on 12/27/21 at 11:13 pm to Mickey Goldmill
Posted on 12/27/21 at 11:20 pm to Ripley
Yes, that’s already been posted here. It doesn’t say what many on here think it does.
Posted on 12/27/21 at 11:26 pm to Ripley
“Such assays can facilitate CONTINUED testing for both influenza and sars-cov2 and can save both time and resources…”
Can you not see they are trying to combine the tests into one to save time and resources? It specifically says that’s the goal. They are saying it’s a combined method that can differentiate the flu and COVID so you don’t have to test for them separately.
Some of y’all lack reading comprehension that’s the real problem here
Can you not see they are trying to combine the tests into one to save time and resources? It specifically says that’s the goal. They are saying it’s a combined method that can differentiate the flu and COVID so you don’t have to test for them separately.
Some of y’all lack reading comprehension that’s the real problem here
Posted on 12/27/21 at 11:29 pm to Ripley
They don’t say anywhere that the old test can’t differentiate flu and COVID
They are just reassuring you that the new test can differentiate because it’s a combined test.
I can’t believe I’m arguing with someone about this
They are just reassuring you that the new test can differentiate because it’s a combined test.
I can’t believe I’m arguing with someone about this
This post was edited on 12/27/21 at 11:29 pm
Posted on 12/27/21 at 11:29 pm to WaWaWeeWa
Eh. It’s a big misunderstanding and then it’s true.
That’s the Covid pattern.
I don’t discount anything anymore.
That’s the Covid pattern.
I don’t discount anything anymore.
Posted on 12/27/21 at 11:35 pm to Mickey Goldmill
quote:
Nope
Just because your beliefs come crashing down don’t continue to be a bitch about it. Wisen up and help others fix this.
Posted on 12/27/21 at 11:44 pm to dgnx6
Didn’t bitch about anything. This OP has been shown countless times to be incorrect nonsense.
Posted on 12/27/21 at 11:44 pm to WaWaWeeWa
And to add icing on this cake - it’s also NOT FDA approved. Just “authorized” under emergency measures.
frick these people.
Posted on 12/27/21 at 11:54 pm to Ripley
1. The old tests were also not FDA approved. They were also being used under EUA.
2. Does that really matter to some of y’all? After all, the vaccines are now FDA approved and that didn’t change anyones mind on here about them.
2. Does that really matter to some of y’all? After all, the vaccines are now FDA approved and that didn’t change anyones mind on here about them.
Posted on 12/28/21 at 12:06 am to Ripley
quote:
And to add icing on this cake - it’s also NOT FDA approved. Just “authorized” under emergency measures
What does this prove?
Are you saying COVID doesn’t exist?
Why don’t you stop beating around the bush and be very specific.
Posted on 12/28/21 at 12:06 am to Mickey Goldmill
quote:
Mickey Goldmill
Posted on 12/28/21 at 12:21 am to Mickey Goldmill
And yet big pharma has full immunity against any consequences. Why is that?
Posted on 12/28/21 at 12:21 am to SDVTiger
I think my screen name is pretty funny too
Popular
Back to top


1






