Started By
Message

re: Candice Owens is a straight up lunatic.

Posted on 10/25/25 at 6:02 pm to
Posted by Duane Dibbley
Red Dwarf
Member since Nov 2011
1752 posts
Posted on 10/25/25 at 6:02 pm to
quote:

Pancake theory is bunk.


What? Are you serious?

Let me try to explain this to you; it's pretty straightforward, though.
The numbers I'm going to use, with the exception of the energy transferred, are for illustrative purposes only.

First, let's address the bowling ball nonsense.
When you drop the bowling ball, it becomes a projectile moving downwards.

The amount of energy needed to break through the first level will scrub some of the speed off and because the bowling ball remains the same weight the amount of energy available to break through the second layer is diminished.

( kinetic energy is calculated as half the mass (\(m\)) times the velocity (\(v\)) squared )

Which means that there will be less energy available to break through the next level.
That's why the bowling ball stops after a short distance, but that's not the case with the World Trade Center.


Let's say that each floor of the World Trade Center weighed 1 million pounds. That means that if there were 10 floors above the initial failure, that would be a 10-million-pound projectile moving downwards at, let's say, 5 feet per second.

That means when the projectile hits the next floor, the amount of energy transferred will be 2.89 million foot-pounds of energy.

No steel beam on the planet can handle that amount of force without giving way. When it does, it adds its weight to the projectile.

So, every floor that collapses increases the weight of the projectile by 1 million pounds, which increases the amount of energy available to break through the next barrier, which the bowling ball does not do.

And because there's more mass available for gravity to work on, the speed will increase.

So, after ten more floors, you now have a 20 million pound projectile moving downwards at, let's say, 15 ft per second that will give you 69.9 million foot pounds of energy to break through the next barrier.

After 40 floors, you now have a 50-million-pound projectile moving downwards, let's say at 35 feet per second —that's 950 million foot-pounds of energy.

That's why there were sheared beams in the debris.

Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
297624 posts
Posted on 10/25/25 at 6:03 pm to
quote:


Apparently saying Trump had something to do with Charlie’s death is “asking questions”.



Its idiotic.

I think some folks like her because she pushes back on Jews. But her ideas are often nonsensical.
Posted by Snipe
Member since Nov 2015
15911 posts
Posted on 10/25/25 at 6:09 pm to
She lost her ever loving mind.

I think either she’s been bought off by the left to stir up an ignorant shite storm or she has undiagnosed syphilis and it’s presenting now as mental illness.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
467197 posts
Posted on 10/25/25 at 6:16 pm to
quote:

What? Are you serious?

Let me try to explain this to you; it's pretty straightforward, though.
The numbers I'm going to use, with the exception of the energy transferred, are for illustrative purposes only.

First, let's address the bowling ball nonsense.
When you drop the bowling ball, it becomes a projectile moving downwards.

The amount of energy needed to break through the first level will scrub some of the speed off and because the bowling ball remains the same weight the amount of energy available to break through the second layer is diminished.

( kinetic energy is calculated as half the mass (\(m\)) times the velocity (\(v\)) squared )

Which means that there will be less energy available to break through the next level.
That's why the bowling ball stops after a short distance, but that's not the case with the World Trade Center.


Let's say that each floor of the World Trade Center weighed 1 million pounds. That means that if there were 10 floors above the initial failure, that would be a 10-million-pound projectile moving downwards at, let's say, 5 feet per second.

That means when the projectile hits the next floor, the amount of energy transferred will be 2.89 million foot-pounds of energy.

No steel beam on the planet can handle that amount of force without giving way. When it does, it adds its weight to the projectile.

So, every floor that collapses increases the weight of the projectile by 1 million pounds, which increases the amount of energy available to break through the next barrier, which the bowling ball does not do.

And because there's more mass available for gravity to work on, the speed will increase.

So, after ten more floors, you now have a 20 million pound projectile moving downwards at, let's say, 15 ft per second that will give you 69.9 million foot pounds of energy to break through the next barrier.

After 40 floors, you now have a 50-million-pound projectile moving downwards, let's say at 35 feet per second —that's 950 million foot-pounds of energy.

That's why there were sheared beams in the debris.



Posted by LsuNav
Sacramento
Member since Mar 2008
1984 posts
Posted on 10/25/25 at 6:17 pm to
Let’s me guess. Is she evil because she doesn’t Israel’s national interests above ours?
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
297624 posts
Posted on 10/25/25 at 6:21 pm to
quote:


Let’s me guess. Is she evil because she doesn’t Israel’s national interests above ours?



Must be the new talking point. Youre not the first to post it.


Shes evil because shes attention whoring over Charlies dead body
This post was edited on 10/25/25 at 6:54 pm
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
467197 posts
Posted on 10/25/25 at 6:24 pm to
quote:

Let’s me guess. Is she evil because she doesn’t Israel’s national interests above ours?

What specific evidence do you have linking the shooting and Israel?
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
467197 posts
Posted on 10/25/25 at 6:41 pm to
quote:

What specific evidence do you have linking the shooting and Israel?


Checking in, 17 minutes later.
Posted by 632627
LA
Member since Dec 2011
14684 posts
Posted on 10/25/25 at 6:51 pm to
Because Ian Carroll and Candace Owens said so.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
467197 posts
Posted on 10/25/25 at 6:54 pm to
Checking in, 30 minutes later.
Posted by 632627
LA
Member since Dec 2011
14684 posts
Posted on 10/25/25 at 6:57 pm to
quote:



No, she could make more by saying nice things about Israel. She worked at the DW, she had that opportunity.


No. Along with all the imbecilic antisemites like yourself, there's over 1b Muslims across the globe eager to listen to her nonsense and pad her pockets.
Posted by Morgus
The Old City Icehouse
Member since May 2004
9827 posts
Posted on 10/25/25 at 7:10 pm to
Rumor is she has enough messages from Charlie for two-years worth of content.
Posted by 3down10
Member since Sep 2014
38278 posts
Posted on 10/25/25 at 7:14 pm to
quote:

Link ?


She worked for DW.

quote:

She picked a topic and used the DW to create the villain role to target that niche. She knows who to grift and that niche

Israel is not her first grift.

Hell, she was moving on from Israel somewhat when she co-opted the "Macron's wife is a man" silliness....until Charlie Kirk was killed.


Yeah, she forced DW to get upset and fire her or whatever happened. She planned it all.

She turned out to be right about Macron's "wife".

She was also very close friends with Charlie Kirk.

quote:

No. Her content is done to make money.


As is every podcast.

quote:


I don't watch her, but her content is posted on here enough to see.

I also see the responses from NPCs defending her.

Note: I was calling her a grifter long before she was even at DW. Her grifting goes well beyond the topic of Israel, and existed for years prior to her taking up that mantle.


Again, you seem to know more about the things she says than I do.

I just recognize the same lame arse campaign to attack her that always comes. It's the same one on Tucker, it's the same one as everyone else who just happens to not kiss Israel arse.

quote:


What? Why? She's an online content creator in a saturated market who lost her initial angle (being a black conservative) years ago.


No she didn't. She's still be at DW if she would have kissed the wall.

quote:


You don't even need to discuss a specific example, unless you think there are not less successful right wing online content creators


Are there more successful right wing online content creators? Or is that different?

This post was edited on 10/25/25 at 7:15 pm
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
467197 posts
Posted on 10/25/25 at 7:18 pm to
Checking in, 38 minutes later.
Posted by 3down10
Member since Sep 2014
38278 posts
Posted on 10/25/25 at 7:20 pm to
quote:

quote:
Pancake theory is bunk.



What? Are you serious?

Let me try to explain this to you; it's pretty straightforward, though.
The numbers I'm going to use, with the exception of the energy transferred, are for illustrative purposes only.

First, let's address the bowling ball nonsense.
When you drop the bowling ball, it becomes a projectile moving downwards.

The amount of energy needed to break through the first level will scrub some of the speed off and because the bowling ball remains the same weight the amount of energy available to break through the second layer is diminished.

( kinetic energy is calculated as half the mass (\(m\)) times the velocity (\(v\)) squared )

Which means that there will be less energy available to break through the next level.
That's why the bowling ball stops after a short distance,


Ok, with you so far.

quote:


Let's say that each floor of the World Trade Center weighed 1 million pounds. That means that if there were 10 floors above the initial failure, that would be a 10-million-pound projectile moving downwards at, let's say, 5 feet per second.

That means when the projectile hits the next floor, the amount of energy transferred will be 2.89 million foot-pounds of energy.

No steel beam on the planet can handle that amount of force without giving way. When it does, it adds its weight to the projectile.

So, every floor that collapses increases the weight of the projectile by 1 million pounds, which increases the amount of energy available to break through the next barrier, which the bowling ball does not do.

And because there's more mass available for gravity to work on, the speed will increase.

So, after ten more floors, you now have a 20 million pound projectile moving downwards at, let's say, 15 ft per second that will give you 69.9 million foot pounds of energy to break through the next barrier.

After 40 floors, you now have a 50-million-pound projectile moving downwards, let's say at 35 feet per second —that's 950 million foot-pounds of energy.

That's why there were sheared beams in the debris.


Except each floor did not add to the weight. Extreme amounts of each floors exploded out up to 600 feet away from the building.

And it fell at near free fall speed, meaning each level was not offering any resistance. There was no deceleration and there should have been, just like you mention above.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
467197 posts
Posted on 10/25/25 at 7:22 pm to
quote:

She worked for DW.

What evidence do you have that she's making less, now?

quote:

She turned out to be right about Macron's "wife".

Uh...what?

quote:

She was also very close friends with Charlie Kirk.

Key word: was

And she's exploiting his death for all its worth, financially, by creating insane bullshite to get clicks and pad her bank account. What a wonderful person.

quote:

I just recognize the same lame arse campaign to attack her that always comes.

Because she says insane stuff only insane people, idiots, or those in the specific niche she's targeting (here, the rabid/irrational anti-Israel types) believe.

And those just "trying to ask questions" and be contrarian CT trolls for the lulz.
Posted by 3down10
Member since Sep 2014
38278 posts
Posted on 10/25/25 at 7:23 pm to
quote:


No. Along with all the imbecilic antisemites like yourself, there's over 1b Muslims across the globe eager to listen to her nonsense and pad her pockets.


If you think all Jewish people support the state of Israel and more importantly the people currently in power there and their actions, then you are a collectivist who thinks all Jewish people are the same.

Is it really that hard for you to treat people as individuals instead of your cookie cutter stereotypes because it makes the world simple for you?
Posted by 3down10
Member since Sep 2014
38278 posts
Posted on 10/25/25 at 7:28 pm to
quote:

What evidence do you have that she's making less, now?


What evidence do you have that she's making more now? You are the one who is making the accusations that it's money based. I do not get that feeling at all. I think she's charged by searching for the truth, something you apparently have trouble understanding.

quote:

Uh...what?


Spoiler: It's a dude.

quote:


Key word: was

And she's exploiting his death for all its worth, financially, by creating insane bullshite to get clicks and pad her bank account. What a wonderful person.



First, Charlie wouldn't at all want to shut her up. In fact, he would want the opposite. That's what Charlie was actually about, open discussion and debate. That was his message, not censorship and attacking people for their opinions.

Second, if you can't count on your friends to ask questions about your murder, who can you count on?

Third, she can get clicks talking about anything.

quote:


Because she says insane stuff only insane people, idiots, or those in the specific niche she's targeting (here, the rabid/irrational anti-Israel types) believe.

And those just "trying to ask questions" and be contrarian CT trolls for the lulz.


The only people who hate people asking questions are people who don't want their actions questioned.

Posted by Hognutz
Member since Sep 2018
2624 posts
Posted on 10/25/25 at 7:30 pm to
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
125648 posts
Posted on 10/25/25 at 7:32 pm to
quote:

Except each floor did not add to the weight. Extreme amounts of each floors exploded out up to 600 feet away from the building.


What do you think this means?

Skip to the part where Jews planted thermite in the building and also tricked some Ayrabs to running planes into them.
first pageprev pagePage 15 of 17Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram