re: Candace Owens is not a “grifter”

quote:

---

Candace Owens reports on her podcast that the Kirk assassination is a cover up based on Kirk appearing to her in a dream.

---

Can you quote her saying this please? I would be interested in seeing this assertion you are making. I have not seen her last few podcast so if you can quote her that would be great.

You can do it by going to her YT channel, find the video, click the "show transcript" button, then used the "find" feature in your browser to find the quote to support your assertion.

That would be really interesting and revealing.

Afterall we don't want to accuse someone of doing something that they did not do to get attention, right?

quote:

---

and she’s never been caught in a lie.

---

quote:

---

So we are going to find out who betrayed Charlie in the coming weeks and it will have international implications.

---

Put down the tinfoil hat

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ICjy5vaRbrA

quote:

---

and she’s never been caught in a lie.

---

Really? She gets called out for lying all the time

Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.

quote:

---

EXPOSING Candace Owens’ contradictions, dishonesty, bad faith, and incompetence.

Candace Owens is trying to suggest that
@josh_hammer
had prior knowledge of Charlie Kirk’s assassination and for some reason posted about it the night before.

She claims:

– He RANDOMLY pulled a 12-year-old Trump post
– He RARELY posts about public executions
– There was NO CONTEXT for the post

Every single one of those claims is false.

- Hammer has REPEATEDLY posted about public executions and the death penalty
- The Trump post was GOING VIRAL that day - connected to Iryna Zarutska’s murder - Candace later contradicts herself by acknowledging this!
- Hammer had already posted about Zarutska that day AND retweeted TWO POSTS about Zarutska before his own

Owens also gets basic facts wrong - Hammer's first post on the topic of public executions was about the Uvalde shooter in 2022. NOPE. Hammer called for the "prompt publicly execution" of the Boston Marathon bomber back in 2019.

So either Candace Owens is deliberately lying to her audience or she’s too incompetent to find the most accessible facts or notice the most basic patterns.

And this is the woman people think is leading the investigation into Charlie Kirk’s assassination?

---

quote:

---

Didn’t Macron’s wife show her pussy

---

He did not, no

quote:

---

Candace Owens is trying to suggest that
@josh_hammer
had prior knowledge of Charlie Kirk’s assassination and for some reason posted about it the night before.

---

And no where in that clip or even in her video does she state Hammer had prior knowledge.

The point of Candace's segment on Hammer was Hammer's lying of Kirk's position of moving away from pro-Israel when Hammer was on the exposed text of Kirk stating he was turning has back on pro -Israel and Hammer grifting his book immediately after Kirk's assassination.

She was speculating that it was odd to tweet "public execution" after a zoom meeting that night with Kirk.

quote:

---

She uses lack of evidence to make a point and plays fast and loose with a lot of things.

---

She was doubting Tyler Robinson's text confession because the word vehicle was used instead of car and Robinson doesn't use the word vehicle. And she has the receipts*.

*Unless you fact check her, then her story falls apart.

Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.

Chuck shumers wife is a man too

People are still calling Jones crazy.

What annoys me about posts like this is that we're supposed to start from the position that these very online people who've never really done anything except lean into controversy for their own profit are credible actors.

Then, it's on us as the public to show they're grifters.

Can you show me where someone like Candace or Alex Jones has blessed peoples' lives, enriched them, made them better? No, not really. Conservatives aren't under obligation to respect or deem credible anyone who wears our tag for a while.

Contrast this with someone like Kirk. Kirk was - or at least became - the anti-grifter.