Started By
Message

re: Candace cult followers, can you explain this?

Posted on 12/13/25 at 8:04 am to
Posted by Errerrerrwere
Member since Aug 2015
43226 posts
Posted on 12/13/25 at 8:04 am to
I remember when they told us not to talk about Seth Rich because it was evil, spit in the face to his family, not becoming, etc.

I don't know if Candace is right or crazy but I don't care if she asks questions.

Don't watch her. But here's, at least, a response for your low hanging fruit thread.
Posted by IvoryBillMatt
Member since Mar 2020
8933 posts
Posted on 12/13/25 at 8:16 am to
quote:

Like what?


There are probably easy and non-suspicious answers to the following:

Why did the FBI just release stills of the alleged perp on the staircase? Wouldn't a video have been much more helpful and answer the issue of whether he was carrying a rifle?

Governor Cox said the perp broke down his rifle after firing the shot. Video of the alleged perp running across the roof shows that he didn't have time to break down the rifle. Was the rifle broken down?

In the roof video of the alleged perp, there is a portion where you can see the runner's shadow, but that disappears. Why is that?

Did the camera that captured the running of the alleged perp show the shooting ?

Did the bullet lodge in Charlie's body?

Why was the crime scene so quickly paved over? Is that unusual?
Posted by Breaux
Member since Nov 2005
4516 posts
Posted on 12/13/25 at 8:17 am to
I think it’s safe to say that fools exist on both sides of the aisle.
Posted by TX Tiger
at home
Member since Jan 2004
37996 posts
Posted on 12/13/25 at 8:20 am to
quote:

I think it’s safe to say that fools exist on both sides of the aisle.
Absolutely.
Posted by Bunk Moreland
Member since Dec 2010
66830 posts
Posted on 12/13/25 at 8:21 am to
People will say they're not releasing more so they don't taint the trial. But, man, if he pleads -- that's just going to feed the conspiracies even more.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
297200 posts
Posted on 12/13/25 at 8:21 am to
quote:

Candace has questions because:
-the fed narrative is bullshite


I love a good conspiracy theory as long as it has some teeth, but y'all have stretched this one far beyond reason.

The view seems to be "the government said it so its false" while not understanding the fact that there are many agencies involved and many people, too many to keep a conspiracy under wraps.

The problem with this approach is its irresponsible and the "throwing shite against the wall" hurts innocent people.
Posted by IvoryBillMatt
Member since Mar 2020
8933 posts
Posted on 12/13/25 at 8:27 am to
quote:

Where is my Madison Brooks faq page?


I don't know who that is, but did the FBI swoop in to say they got the suspect and then share photos and video that themselves raise some questions?

Again, I'm sure there are probably easy answers, but the failure to provide them fuels what might be wacky theories.

FWIW: I think Robinson probably killed Kirk. I don't know if he acted alone, but others must have had foreknowledge.
This post was edited on 12/13/25 at 9:15 am
Posted by IvoryBillMatt
Member since Mar 2020
8933 posts
Posted on 12/13/25 at 8:30 am to
quote:

People will say they're not releasing more so they don't taint the trial. But, man, if he pleads -- that's just going to feed the conspiracies even more.


I understand the "not releasing more," but some of what they have released doesn't make sense...without explanation.

What would be the harm in fully explaining the roof video they have already released?
Posted by TX Tiger
at home
Member since Jan 2004
37996 posts
Posted on 12/13/25 at 8:40 am to
quote:

People will say they're not releasing more so they don't taint the trial.
How convenient. They don’t want to release photos and videos of him actually committing the crime because it might taint the trial?
What a croc.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
297200 posts
Posted on 12/13/25 at 8:41 am to
quote:



Again, I'm sure there are probably easy answers, but the failure to provide them fuels what might be wacky theories.


Thats the fault of the conspiracy nuts. You can never appease them.
Posted by TX Tiger
at home
Member since Jan 2004
37996 posts
Posted on 12/13/25 at 8:48 am to
You don’t think the Deep State puts out wild conspiracy theories so that people like you will lump them together with anyone who questions the official story?
Posted by Toomer Deplorable
Team Bitter Clinger
Member since May 2020
23620 posts
Posted on 12/13/25 at 8:49 am to
quote:

Maybe people shouldn’t believe everything they see on the internet just because it’s from a trusted “source”, aka their echo chamber.



And that applies equally to the FBI and the DOJ. Does any rational person here genuinely believe that it was just a long series of repeated miscues that led to the “suicide” of Epstein?




Posted by lepdagod
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2015
5527 posts
Posted on 12/13/25 at 8:49 am to
quote:

The left


Has nothing to do with it… this shite in the same vein as the “election was stolen” bullshite … say a bunch of shite never have real evidence to back it up…
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
297200 posts
Posted on 12/13/25 at 8:49 am to
quote:

You don’t think the Deep State puts out wild conspiracy theories so that people like you will lump them together with anyone who questions the official story?


Not everything is a conspiracy. I dont know why this is so difficult for y'all.

You will never accept anything except "alternative" media grifts.
Posted by TX Tiger
at home
Member since Jan 2004
37996 posts
Posted on 12/13/25 at 8:57 am to
quote:

Not everything is a conspiracy. I dont know why this is so difficult for y'all.
In the field of politics the percentage is infinitely higher.
The job of the media and government is to shape your opinion. That in itself is conspiracy. So the information the Deep State chooses to release to us through media and government is suspect at best.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
297200 posts
Posted on 12/13/25 at 8:59 am to
quote:


In the field of politics the percentage is infinitely higher.


Probably. But there are also more moving parts that can fall apart. This one would be easy.

Instead of trashing people who arent involved, maybe the conspiracy nuts should start picking the story apart instead of throwing shite against the wall. I hope Candace gets sued into oblivion.
Posted by blueboy
Member since Apr 2006
63244 posts
Posted on 12/13/25 at 9:02 am to
quote:

Candace cult followers
These people do not exist.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
297200 posts
Posted on 12/13/25 at 9:04 am to
quote:



And that applies equally to the FBI and the DOJ


I agree. Except in this case it actually appears that Tyler Robinson shot Charlie and there may not be a long trail of co-conspirators.

But the fairy tales will just grow from here. It makes money for clickbait artists.
Posted by wackatimesthree
Member since Oct 2019
10639 posts
Posted on 12/13/25 at 9:07 am to
quote:

Candace has questions


No, Candace doesn't "have questions."

What she's doing isn't "having questions."

What she's doing is irresponsibly accusing anybody and everybody she can think of because weak minded idiots like yourself click on her bullshite when she throws the red meat out there.

quote:

the fed narrative is bullshite


There's absolutely no reason—none—to believe that what has been reported so far isn't true. In order to come to that conclusion you have to start with it. Which is not "having questions," it's creating controversy out of thin air, where there was none before.

Plus, you only have maybe 15% of the "fed narrative." You won't have the rest of it until after the trial, when they release the other 85% of the evidence they have.

quote:

why did TPUSA lie about CK’s position on Israel


There are about 100 reasons that could be why they gave whatever answer you're referring to here that don't involve an international conspiracy.

Here's a question for you:

If the mentally ill homosexual that was arrested for the crime was set up as a patsy, why hasn't he said so? Lee Oswald claimed to be a patsy publicly within hours of being arrested. Why hasn't this guy?

Posted by TX Tiger
at home
Member since Jan 2004
37996 posts
Posted on 12/13/25 at 9:07 am to
quote:

Instead of trashing people who arent involved, maybe the conspiracy nuts should start picking the story apart instead of throwing shite against the wall. I hope Candace gets sued into oblivion.
First of all, we have absolutely no idea who was involved. What we do know is who the Deep State controlled media wants us to believe was involved.
Secondly, as I said, the Deep State will purposely release wild conspiracy theories so that lazy thinking people will lump them together with anyone who questions their “official” story (emphasis on “story”).
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 9Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram