- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Candace cult followers, can you explain this?
Posted on 12/13/25 at 8:04 am to Geekboy
Posted on 12/13/25 at 8:04 am to Geekboy
I remember when they told us not to talk about Seth Rich because it was evil, spit in the face to his family, not becoming, etc.
I don't know if Candace is right or crazy but I don't care if she asks questions.
Don't watch her. But here's, at least, a response for your low hanging fruit thread.
I don't know if Candace is right or crazy but I don't care if she asks questions.
Don't watch her. But here's, at least, a response for your low hanging fruit thread.
Posted on 12/13/25 at 8:16 am to dgnx6
quote:
Like what?
There are probably easy and non-suspicious answers to the following:
Why did the FBI just release stills of the alleged perp on the staircase? Wouldn't a video have been much more helpful and answer the issue of whether he was carrying a rifle?
Governor Cox said the perp broke down his rifle after firing the shot. Video of the alleged perp running across the roof shows that he didn't have time to break down the rifle. Was the rifle broken down?
In the roof video of the alleged perp, there is a portion where you can see the runner's shadow, but that disappears. Why is that?
Did the camera that captured the running of the alleged perp show the shooting ?
Did the bullet lodge in Charlie's body?
Why was the crime scene so quickly paved over? Is that unusual?
Posted on 12/13/25 at 8:17 am to TX Tiger
I think it’s safe to say that fools exist on both sides of the aisle.
Posted on 12/13/25 at 8:20 am to Breaux
quote:Absolutely.
I think it’s safe to say that fools exist on both sides of the aisle.
Posted on 12/13/25 at 8:21 am to IvoryBillMatt
People will say they're not releasing more so they don't taint the trial. But, man, if he pleads -- that's just going to feed the conspiracies even more.
Posted on 12/13/25 at 8:21 am to Zephyrius
quote:
Candace has questions because:
-the fed narrative is bullshite
I love a good conspiracy theory as long as it has some teeth, but y'all have stretched this one far beyond reason.
The view seems to be "the government said it so its false" while not understanding the fact that there are many agencies involved and many people, too many to keep a conspiracy under wraps.
The problem with this approach is its irresponsible and the "throwing shite against the wall" hurts innocent people.
Posted on 12/13/25 at 8:27 am to dgnx6
quote:
Where is my Madison Brooks faq page?
I don't know who that is, but did the FBI swoop in to say they got the suspect and then share photos and video that themselves raise some questions?
Again, I'm sure there are probably easy answers, but the failure to provide them fuels what might be wacky theories.
FWIW: I think Robinson probably killed Kirk. I don't know if he acted alone, but others must have had foreknowledge.
This post was edited on 12/13/25 at 9:15 am
Posted on 12/13/25 at 8:30 am to Bunk Moreland
quote:
People will say they're not releasing more so they don't taint the trial. But, man, if he pleads -- that's just going to feed the conspiracies even more.
I understand the "not releasing more," but some of what they have released doesn't make sense...without explanation.
What would be the harm in fully explaining the roof video they have already released?
Posted on 12/13/25 at 8:40 am to Bunk Moreland
quote:How convenient. They don’t want to release photos and videos of him actually committing the crime because it might taint the trial?
People will say they're not releasing more so they don't taint the trial.
What a croc.
Posted on 12/13/25 at 8:41 am to IvoryBillMatt
quote:
Again, I'm sure there are probably easy answers, but the failure to provide them fuels what might be wacky theories.
Thats the fault of the conspiracy nuts. You can never appease them.
Posted on 12/13/25 at 8:48 am to RogerTheShrubber
You don’t think the Deep State puts out wild conspiracy theories so that people like you will lump them together with anyone who questions the official story?
Posted on 12/13/25 at 8:49 am to Breaux
quote:
Maybe people shouldn’t believe everything they see on the internet just because it’s from a trusted “source”, aka their echo chamber.
And that applies equally to the FBI and the DOJ. Does any rational person here genuinely believe that it was just a long series of repeated miscues that led to the “suicide” of Epstein?
Posted on 12/13/25 at 8:49 am to AU86
quote:
The left
Has nothing to do with it… this shite in the same vein as the “election was stolen” bullshite … say a bunch of shite never have real evidence to back it up…
Posted on 12/13/25 at 8:49 am to TX Tiger
quote:
You don’t think the Deep State puts out wild conspiracy theories so that people like you will lump them together with anyone who questions the official story?
Not everything is a conspiracy. I dont know why this is so difficult for y'all.
You will never accept anything except "alternative" media grifts.
Posted on 12/13/25 at 8:57 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:In the field of politics the percentage is infinitely higher.
Not everything is a conspiracy. I dont know why this is so difficult for y'all.
The job of the media and government is to shape your opinion. That in itself is conspiracy. So the information the Deep State chooses to release to us through media and government is suspect at best.
Posted on 12/13/25 at 8:59 am to TX Tiger
quote:
In the field of politics the percentage is infinitely higher.
Probably. But there are also more moving parts that can fall apart. This one would be easy.
Instead of trashing people who arent involved, maybe the conspiracy nuts should start picking the story apart instead of throwing shite against the wall. I hope Candace gets sued into oblivion.
Posted on 12/13/25 at 9:02 am to Geekboy
quote:These people do not exist.
Candace cult followers
Posted on 12/13/25 at 9:04 am to Toomer Deplorable
quote:
And that applies equally to the FBI and the DOJ
I agree. Except in this case it actually appears that Tyler Robinson shot Charlie and there may not be a long trail of co-conspirators.
But the fairy tales will just grow from here. It makes money for clickbait artists.
Posted on 12/13/25 at 9:07 am to Zephyrius
quote:
Candace has questions
No, Candace doesn't "have questions."
What she's doing isn't "having questions."
What she's doing is irresponsibly accusing anybody and everybody she can think of because weak minded idiots like yourself click on her bullshite when she throws the red meat out there.
quote:
the fed narrative is bullshite
There's absolutely no reason—none—to believe that what has been reported so far isn't true. In order to come to that conclusion you have to start with it. Which is not "having questions," it's creating controversy out of thin air, where there was none before.
Plus, you only have maybe 15% of the "fed narrative." You won't have the rest of it until after the trial, when they release the other 85% of the evidence they have.
quote:
why did TPUSA lie about CK’s position on Israel
There are about 100 reasons that could be why they gave whatever answer you're referring to here that don't involve an international conspiracy.
Here's a question for you:
If the mentally ill homosexual that was arrested for the crime was set up as a patsy, why hasn't he said so? Lee Oswald claimed to be a patsy publicly within hours of being arrested. Why hasn't this guy?
Posted on 12/13/25 at 9:07 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:First of all, we have absolutely no idea who was involved. What we do know is who the Deep State controlled media wants us to believe was involved.
Instead of trashing people who arent involved, maybe the conspiracy nuts should start picking the story apart instead of throwing shite against the wall. I hope Candace gets sued into oblivion.
Secondly, as I said, the Deep State will purposely release wild conspiracy theories so that lazy thinking people will lump them together with anyone who questions their “official” story (emphasis on “story”).
Popular
Back to top


0




