- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Canada punishes caner patients/doctors for trying Ivermectin
Posted on 3/13/26 at 1:16 pm to SallysHuman
Posted on 3/13/26 at 1:16 pm to SallysHuman
communist are evil people
Posted on 3/13/26 at 1:18 pm to SallysHuman
quote:
What I'm reading from your post is that people who would otherwise be content with a combo approach WITH their doctors
No. The guy I quoted was mostly concerned with people using Ivermectin in place of the normal protocol. I think he is contemptuous of Ivermectin as a cancer fighter, but as long as it does no harm I doubt he cares. His germane quote was about someone getting sick due to Ivermectin being taken in combo with proven methods, then quitting the proven methods and betting on Ivermectin.
Posted on 3/13/26 at 1:21 pm to Penrod
quote:
Made her so sick she had to stop her other proven treatments, and subsequently as you know has bone metastasis
As you know? Made her sick?
Why are you fricking lying? Either your nephew is an idiot or you are outright lying.
Posted on 3/13/26 at 1:23 pm to Night Vision
Since they take forever to process care on patients I imagine they rather see them pass on
Posted on 3/13/26 at 1:23 pm to Penrod
quote:
His germane quote was about someone getting sick due to Ivermectin being taken in combo with proven methods, then quitting the proven methods and betting on Ivermectin.
Can't the proven methods make a patient sick all by themselves? I'm curious how he was able to determine root cause of the illness.
Posted on 3/13/26 at 1:23 pm to Penrod
quote:
His germane quote was about someone getting sick due to Ivermectin being taken in combo with proven methods, then quitting the proven methods and betting on Ivermectin.
What do you think made the patient sicker? Caustic cancer drugs or relatively harmless ivermectin?
Cancer meds are hell, I'm sorry his patient wasn't educated to understand that with or without ivermectin, cancer meds are rough and rife with unpleasant side effects.
People die from cancer every day while being treated with the standard of care... it's not like a shot of penicillin that quickly and almost assuredly clears up your syphilis. It's hit or miss and misery in the meantime. People are literally dying for expanded options.
Posted on 3/13/26 at 1:28 pm to SallysHuman
I think that entire post was bullshite. It's in the same vein as when they tried telling us that ivermectin was dangerous during COVID. Come to find out ivermectin kills COVID too.
These people are literal maniacs.
These people are literal maniacs.
Posted on 3/13/26 at 1:29 pm to GRTiger
quote:
I'm curious how he was able to determine root cause of the illness.
Me too. I’ll ask.
Posted on 3/13/26 at 1:31 pm to AlterEd
quote:
Why are you fricking lying? Either your nephew is an idiot or you are outright lying.
I just quoted someone else who is a very smart and conscientious doctor. If you say it is a lie can you link the studies that show how Ivermecton, added to normal cancer protocols, affects patient side effects?
Posted on 3/13/26 at 1:32 pm to AlterEd
quote:
I think that entire post was bullshite.
I don't doubt medical professionals speak that way.
If a cancer patient does all the "right" treatments and still dies, well, they say they did all they could, gave it their best shot and unfortunately cancer still wins a lot of the time.
If a cancer patient decides to go the alternative route and dies, well, it's their own damned fault and they should have listened to their doctor.
If the cancer patient on alternative treatment lives, well, it's a fluke and not at all indicative of success in cancer treatment options.
And it's not just cancer but all aspects of ill-care.
Posted on 3/13/26 at 1:34 pm to Night Vision
quote:hes moving to be a social media influencer? He hasn’t had a medical license in 7 years
I’m moving to Florida and will work there
Posted on 3/13/26 at 1:35 pm to Penrod
quote:
If you say it is a lie can you link the studies that show how Ivermecton, added to normal cancer protocols, affects patient side effects?
Show this to your dumbass nephew. Maybe he will actually save someone's life.
The Study
This post was edited on 3/13/26 at 1:37 pm
Posted on 3/13/26 at 1:41 pm to AlterEd
Cosmo, SFP and onmymedicalgrind will surely be along any time now.


Posted on 3/13/26 at 1:55 pm to AlterEd
A question for the "doctors" that are reading this thread but won't fricking touch it. How does cancer become chemo-resistant? Are we arguing that cancer evolves? Could this be why anti-parasitics seem to fight it? Because it not only parallels parasites, but also behaves like one?
Posted on 3/13/26 at 1:56 pm to Night Vision
Trust what we tell you the science says
Posted on 3/13/26 at 2:01 pm to SouthEasternKaiju
quote:
Trust what we tell you the science says
Exactly. And Al Gore says we are all already dead due to global warming. Florida is now under water.
Posted on 3/13/26 at 2:03 pm to Night Vision
Can somebody link the law that Makis is talking about in OP?
Posted on 3/13/26 at 2:09 pm to TigerDoc
quote:
TigerDoc
I've been shitting on doctors in this thread, but this guy is legit.
Respect.
Posted on 3/13/26 at 2:18 pm to TigerDoc
quote:
Can somebody link the law that Makis is talking about in OP?
Canada has a right to die, not a right to try. Their program is Special Access Program in which the doctor can request, in certain situations, to try unproven treatments- with the blessings of both the manufacturer of whatever drug as well as the government.
I prefer our right to try over their right to die, personally.
Popular
Back to top


0






