Started By
Message

Can we stop saying chauvin was a sacrificial lamb?

Posted on 4/21/21 at 8:07 am
Posted by Stidham8
Member since Aug 2018
6941 posts
Posted on 4/21/21 at 8:07 am
I think George Floyd was a crackhead, low-life, scum, thug..... but to pretend that Chauvin was 100% correct in the way he handled kneeling on the guys neck for 10 minutes when it was clear he was dead after about 5 of those minutes was absurd.

Both of them being pieces of shite can both be correct. Chauvin wasn’t innocent, and Floyd certainly wasn’t either.
Posted by moneyg
Member since Jun 2006
56482 posts
Posted on 4/21/21 at 8:08 am to
quote:

to pretend that Chauvin was 100% correct in the way he handled kneeling on the guys neck for 10 minutes when it was clear he was dead after about 5 of those minutes was absurd.


Don't move the goalposts.

Is he guilty of murder, or is he not?
Posted by The Maj
Member since Sep 2016
27117 posts
Posted on 4/21/21 at 8:08 am to
quote:

but to pretend that Chauvin
got a fair trial is absurd...
Posted by Turbeauxdog
Member since Aug 2004
23182 posts
Posted on 4/21/21 at 8:09 am to
It wasn't murder by any sane standard. Manslaughter would have been reasonable.
Posted by Hoops
LA
Member since Jan 2013
6529 posts
Posted on 4/21/21 at 8:09 am to
Most don’t care about Chauvin. It’s the idea of the mob, media and government intimidating and trying to influence.
Posted by ShoeBang
Member since May 2012
19358 posts
Posted on 4/21/21 at 8:09 am to
I agree with you but if you think the jury was not tainted or intimidated by outside influence, I'd bet you think strippers like you too
Posted by Bayoubred
Parts Unknown
Member since Jan 2011
3363 posts
Posted on 4/21/21 at 8:09 am to
No "we" can't. Because we know if the roles had been reversed, the Porn star/armed robber would have walked.
Posted by Damone
FoCo
Member since Aug 2016
32737 posts
Posted on 4/21/21 at 8:10 am to
quote:

Is he guilty of murder, or is he not?

Well twelve people unanimously voted to find him guilty after hearing every bit of testimony and evidence. So... he’s guilty.
Posted by PeteRose
Hall of Fame
Member since Aug 2014
16864 posts
Posted on 4/21/21 at 8:10 am to
quote:


Both of them being pieces of shite


But one of them is a hero and martyr. So I think you missed the point.
Posted by Powerman
Member since Jan 2004
162220 posts
Posted on 4/21/21 at 8:10 am to
Nuance isn't allowed. You have to pick sides cuck!
Posted by CU_Tigers4life
Georgia
Member since Aug 2013
7505 posts
Posted on 4/21/21 at 8:10 am to
quote:

Don't move the goalposts.

Is he guilty of murder, or is he not?


He's guilty of bad policing and allowed his ego to and unwillingness to ease up on Floyd to take him down. I say it's a manslaughter case.
Posted by OGM
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2020
460 posts
Posted on 4/21/21 at 8:10 am to
As soon as the left stops saying GF was a hero that changed the world.
Posted by Mo Jeaux
Member since Aug 2008
58704 posts
Posted on 4/21/21 at 8:10 am to
quote:

to pretend that Chauvin was 100% correct


Very few probably believe this by the way. You also could have kept your unoriginal thought in one of the other threads with the same subject.
Posted by gthog61
Irving, TX
Member since Nov 2009
71001 posts
Posted on 4/21/21 at 8:10 am to
quote:

I think George Floyd was a crackhead, low-life, scum, thug..... but to pretend that Chauvin was 100% correct in the way he handled kneeling on the guys neck for 10 minutes when it was clear he was dead after about 5 of those minutes was absurd.

Both of them being pieces of shite can both be correct. Chauvin wasn’t innocent, and Floyd certainly wasn’t either.



If that is all true why not allow the justice system to work?

Why did we need a congresswoman to fly halfway across the country to "help it along"? Why is the president calling Floyd's brother?

Why is CBS threatening jurors?

If all that is happening why isn't he a sacrificial lamb? Maybe the verdict was correct but it was achieved in entirely the wrong way.

Maybe the verdict isn't correct. I didn't watch.
Posted by imjustafatkid
Alabama
Member since Dec 2011
50454 posts
Posted on 4/21/21 at 8:11 am to
quote:

I think George Floyd was a crackhead, low-life, scum, thug..... but to pretend that Chauvin was 100% correct in the way he handled kneeling on the guys neck for 10 minutes when it was clear he was dead after about 5 of those minutes was absurd.

Both of them being pieces of shite can both be correct. Chauvin wasn’t innocent, and Floyd certainly wasn’t either.


K. Have anything relevant to the charges he was found guilty of?
This post was edited on 4/21/21 at 8:12 am
Posted by BobBoucher
Member since Jan 2008
16730 posts
Posted on 4/21/21 at 8:11 am to
quote:

It wasn't murder by any sane standard.


I think you can blame Minnesota statute for that. Murder 2 can be unintentional death.

Which makes no sense.
Posted by ApexTiger
cary nc
Member since Oct 2003
53771 posts
Posted on 4/21/21 at 8:12 am to
quote:

Both of them being pieces of shite can both be correct. Chauvin wasn’t innocent, and Floyd certainly wasn’t either.


Okay

but Floyd is the reason that day happened like it did

these are facts

Drugs, fake money, resisting arrest

it's always the same crap...

no one in media or black community talking about anything but policing

as if that change anything of any significance for inner city blacks who are fatherless...getting into all kinds of trouble

would you be okay with just black officers working just black communities?
Posted by DaTruth7
Member since Apr 2020
3811 posts
Posted on 4/21/21 at 8:13 am to
Thanks for this thread again you pos.
Posted by SOKAL
Member since May 2018
4124 posts
Posted on 4/21/21 at 8:14 am to
quote:

Well twelve people unanimously voted to find him guilty after hearing every bit of testimony and evidence. So... he’s guilty.


They also heard Auntie Maxine and the man who took down Corn Pop, not to mention all the peaceful rioters ready to burn down the city.
Posted by moneyg
Member since Jun 2006
56482 posts
Posted on 4/21/21 at 8:15 am to
quote:

Well twelve people unanimously voted to find him guilty after hearing every bit of testimony and evidence. So... he’s guilty.


The premise of the conversation is that he was a sacrificial lamb. You can't point to him being a sacrificial lamb as proof that he's not a sacrificial lamb.

So, back to the original question. Do you believe, based on the evidence presented, he's guilty of murder?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram