Started By
Message

re: Can ABC force Sinclair to air Jimmy Kimmel

Posted on 9/23/25 at 11:58 am to
Posted by matsuflex
Louisiana
Member since Feb 2009
1609 posts
Posted on 9/23/25 at 11:58 am to
Is the Super Bowl on ABC? I heard it mentioned they could threaten them with that if they don’t.
Posted by RicoSuave2025
Member since Jan 2025
276 posts
Posted on 9/23/25 at 11:59 am to
Kimmel’s ratings were terrible. This seems like a publicity stunt to try and get someone to watch his awful show. He will be gone again by end of the year. Not bc of his comments but because he is not funny anymore. It’s sad to see democrats worship Jimmy Kimmel. They are lost with no one to look up to. I guess they still have Harris. Maybe she will get back on her knees to get another nomination.
Posted by Hawgleg
Member since Jan 2022
681 posts
Posted on 9/23/25 at 12:07 pm to
Would not want to be the person answering the phone if its aired state wide here in Arkansas.
Posted by Soggy_Bottoms
Member since Sep 2025
175 posts
Posted on 9/23/25 at 12:11 pm to
Somewhere Johnny Carson is laughing his arse off, and even Dick Cavat was more popular than present day Late-night Buffoons. Years ago CBS had it right, they couldn't compete with Carson, so they aired Movies and syndicated reruns of popular TV shows like McLoud, Columbo, MacMillon and Wife, etc
Posted by The Torch
DFW The Dub
Member since Aug 2014
29524 posts
Posted on 9/23/25 at 12:12 pm to
The DNC will subsidize any loses to keep their propaganda bitch going.
Posted by shinerfan
Duckworld(Earth-616)
Member since Sep 2009
28525 posts
Posted on 9/23/25 at 12:21 pm to
quote:

Or even revoke their license to show their programs?




They probably could do this. They won't.
Posted by BigGreenTiger
Member since Mar 2022
794 posts
Posted on 9/23/25 at 12:30 pm to
CHATGPT has a very different take than GROK


Affiliation agreement: Sinclair owns several ABC affiliates, but the local stations are independently owned. They have a contract with ABC/Disney that defines what network programming they must air. These contracts typically cover prime time and late-night programming, so in theory, ABC can require the station to carry shows like Kimmel.

Leeway for preemption: Most affiliation agreements have clauses that allow the station to preempt network programming for:

Breaking local news

Severe weather emergencies

Certain local events or sports conflicts

But routine rejection of a late-night show like Kimmel, without a compelling contractual reason, would usually violate the agreement.

Practical reality: In rare cases, stations have pushed back on shows for content reasons (e.g., political commentary), but Disney/ABC could then:

Require the station to air the show

Or threaten to terminate the affiliation agreement when it comes up for renewal, which is a very strong incentive to comply.

Bottom line: Disney/ABC can generally force Sinclair to air Kimmel under the affiliation agreement, unless there’s a legitimate exception spelled out in the contract. Refusing without a valid reason could risk the station losing ABC affiliation entirely.



This is not the hill Disney is willing to die on. They shot themselves in the foot when the suspended him, not reinstating him will result in more backlast from the right. They should have just done nothing.
This post was edited on 9/23/25 at 12:32 pm
Posted by krewerider
Member since Sep 2009
996 posts
Posted on 9/23/25 at 12:34 pm to
quote:

Kimmel's show will break viewing records starting tonight


Might be hard to do with 60 less stations for viewers to watch it on.
Posted by teke184
Zachary, LA
Member since Jan 2007
103895 posts
Posted on 9/23/25 at 12:35 pm to
Can the affiliates time shift a show and still be considered broadcasting it?

If Kimmel gets preempted at 11PM then airs at 3AM, it is still airing even at a less than ideal time.
Posted by BigGreenTiger
Member since Mar 2022
794 posts
Posted on 9/23/25 at 12:38 pm to
from how i intepreted it, they have to show it, but can decide how to show it. They can stream it on their youtube channel if they want. Which would obviously result in more conflict with disney, but that wouldnt be a breach of contract.

I don't know what the contract says though.
This post was edited on 9/23/25 at 12:39 pm
Posted by teke184
Zachary, LA
Member since Jan 2007
103895 posts
Posted on 9/23/25 at 12:38 pm to
Seems like they’re out then.

“Well, Celebrty Family Feud was doing well in that time slot so we moved Kimmel back to the graveyard shift.”
Posted by Reagan80
Earth
Member since Feb 2023
2330 posts
Posted on 9/23/25 at 12:46 pm to
Eventually they will cave. ABC can take away programming. If they take away enough stuff that the viewers like, they will cause the viewers to turn on Sinclair.
Posted by Dee_oh_Dee
Member since Aug 2024
194 posts
Posted on 9/23/25 at 12:48 pm to

quote:

Kimmel's show will break viewing records starting tonight.




quote:

Might be hard to do with 60 less stations for viewers to watch it on.




quote:

Sinclair Broadcast Group's population reach is capped at 39% of U.S. television households by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), which is the highest level permitted for a single broadcaster. This regulatory limit was applied during the company's 2018 proposed merger with Tribune Media, which would have further increased Sinclair's reach to 72% of households but was scaled back to stay within the FCC's ownership cap.



39% of the population is going to be blacked out by Sinclair.
Posted by PeleofAnalytics
Member since Jun 2021
5366 posts
Posted on 9/23/25 at 12:48 pm to
They don't own the stations so no. They can try to get in some "breach of contract" fight but there is likely something in those contracts that requires Disney to maintain certain standards of decency and ratings for their station that would have to go to court to hash out.
Posted by BigGreenTiger
Member since Mar 2022
794 posts
Posted on 9/23/25 at 12:49 pm to
What would they take though? Dancing with the stars? Disney can't threaten to pull the NFL. The NFL would nevel let themselves be a negotiation tactic.
Posted by teke184
Zachary, LA
Member since Jan 2007
103895 posts
Posted on 9/23/25 at 12:49 pm to
Didn’t the Conan situation on NBC happen because the affiliates were going to drop Leno en masse from the 9-10PM slot?

NBC’s solution was to put Leno back in late night by fricking Conan, which resulted in Conan going to TBS.
Posted by BigGreenTiger
Member since Mar 2022
794 posts
Posted on 9/23/25 at 12:52 pm to
If people are watching Kimmel, he will find a home. I personally think late night talk shows are dead. Trump has this rose tinted view of them like they have so much power, when in reality some random YouTube channel has more power.
Posted by LSU Grad Alabama Fan
369 Cardboard Box Lane
Member since Nov 2019
14227 posts
Posted on 9/23/25 at 12:52 pm to
Can Sinclair just put his show on at 3 AM and meet contract obligations?
Posted by KiwiHead
Auckland, NZ
Member since Jul 2014
37466 posts
Posted on 9/23/25 at 12:52 pm to
Depends on the contract with ABC / Disney. Years ago, the CBS affiliate in NO wanted to push back the airing of Letterman due to the fact that WWL's airing of M*A*S*H* at 10 35 kicked arse in local ratings. CBS essentially said that if WWL wanted to continue airing CBS network programs that Letterman would have to be played in the time slot that the network was airing it. They were going after Leno. Result was, that Leno was vaulted to the top of the local ratings.

Also, this was right before Fox took NFC games from CBS.....so the Saints played a role in it. Also before 1997 Telecom Act which gave the network a lot of power over the affiliiates.
Posted by BuckI
Grove City, Ohio
Member since Oct 2020
7229 posts
Posted on 9/23/25 at 12:55 pm to
Has anything like this happened before?
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram