- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 2/4/23 at 6:15 pm to Tigerinthewoods
quote:
You are the definition of a Narcissist. You contradict everyone because you think you are smarter and wiser than everyone and the fact that you are a liberal
Or how about, he just disagrees?
And Hank is clearly not a political liberal. He is a conservative.
Posted on 2/4/23 at 6:16 pm to Penrod
quote:
And Hank is clearly not a political liberal. He is a conservative.
Oh for frick’s sake.
Posted on 2/4/23 at 6:26 pm to Penrod
quote:
And Hank is clearly not a political liberal. He is a conservative.
Posted on 2/4/23 at 6:27 pm to Drizzt
quote:
Pretty good bet that a physician living in California was a virtue signaling liberal who had completely bought into DIE and voted Democrat every election. Hard to feel sorry for him getting what he voted for.
I bet most doctors in California vote Republican.
Posted on 2/4/23 at 6:32 pm to SOSFAN
quote:
Keep in mind he said he observes threads and when he see views being made that HE judges as wrong he swoops in to provide justice.
What a stupid point. All of the argumentative posts on this board are from people who see posts with which THEY disagree and then argue about.
Do you think it more reasonable that Hank should argue against things with which he agrees? This gets funnier the more I think about it.
Posted on 2/4/23 at 6:40 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Hanks says it was the bikers fault for running a stop sign.
No he didn’t. You are either a fool, or you are being juvenile.
Posted on 2/4/23 at 6:43 pm to Penrod
quote:Sure he did. You a literal woman?
Hanks says it was the bikers fault for running a stop sign.
No he didn’t. You are either a fool, or you are being juvenile.
Posted on 2/4/23 at 6:45 pm to Penrod
quote:
No he didn’t. You are either a fool, or you are being juvenile.
Exactly. Hank didn't say that. Hank threw out suggestions that the biker did something besides what really happened. As usual trying to paint the victim in a negative light and then make the actions of the evil person seem not quite as evil.
Posted on 2/4/23 at 6:47 pm to Penrod
quote:
And Hank is clearly not a political liberal. He is a conservative
You are a caricature.
Posted on 2/4/23 at 6:48 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
You are probably correct. Los Angeles LEOs are probably lying about the evidence they have been able to gather thus far.
JFC
Look man...
I'm completely over this crap. If you want to play board contrian then keep doing that by all means. But what you aren't going to do is put straw man arguments into people's posts and then act morally superior when you out argue the straw man.
People can't even discuss news of interest without you derailing the thread and arguing with yourself in the quotes. Stop doing it.
Posted on 2/4/23 at 6:51 pm to Penrod
Penrod white knighting for Pedohank. Why am I not surprised
Posted on 2/4/23 at 7:00 pm to roadGator
quote:
Why do you do this?
He enjoys the spotlight. It's why he came back after a year long suspension.
Posted on 2/4/23 at 7:22 pm to Bulldogblitz
quote:
It's why he came back after a year long suspension.
Dude, he never left.
He continued posting under no less than 3 alters.
Now he WAS permabanned from the Aggie Boards, don't know if he used alters there....
Maybe some of our Aggie friends who post on this board can tell us.
Posted on 2/4/23 at 7:22 pm to Penrod
quote:I suppose it depends upon what one means by "incidental."quote:Hold on Hank. I’ve been with you so far in this argument, but race was clearly not incidental. It was, at best, a strong factor and at worst, the main cause.
My only question is whether "race" was the precipitating factor in this attack, or merely incidental.
My point was not whether "race" was "incidental" in the final assault (clearly it was more than that, if one believes the 2nd- and 3rd-hand reports that he screamed about "White Privilege").
My point was that "race" may have been "incidental" in INITIATING the sequence of events. For instance, if some minor traffic-related infraction sent the motorist into a fit of "road rage," it seems doubtful that the race of the cyclist was a major contributing factor in STARTING the conflict. To the contrary, it would have been his ACTIONS (no matter how innocuous).
quote:As to the post-ramming (hand-to-hand) assault, I tend to agree with you (subject to the same assumption re "White Privilege").
It was, at best, a strong factor and at worst, the main cause.
This post was edited on 2/4/23 at 7:59 pm
Posted on 2/4/23 at 7:26 pm to Penrod
quote:I think that I may use words that lie outside Roger's vocabulary, leaving him in a constant state of confusion. In fairness to Roger, he is not the only one.quote:No he didn’t. You are either a fool, or you are being juvenile.
Hanks says it was the bikers fault for running a stop sign.
In this case, I honestly think that Roger did not understand my use of the term "innocuous" to describe whatever action by the cyclist MIGHT have "triggered" the motorist.
This post was edited on 2/4/23 at 8:20 pm
Posted on 2/4/23 at 7:30 pm to Penrod
quote:The words "conservative" and "liberal" are meaningless these days.
Hank is clearly not a political liberal. He is a conservative.
Years and years ago, I used the term "small/limited government conservative" to describe my views regarding the appropriate scope of government. The problem is that the SAME WORD ("conservative") is used to describe the absolutely AUTHORITARIAN veiwpoints of the "social conservatives," so I discarded the use of the word "conservative" from any description of my views. Now, I use "limited government advocate" to describe essentially the same views.
Ideologically on social issues, I fall soundly in the mainstream of libertarian thought, which basically places me Right of most "liberals" and Left of most "conservatives."
It is not a simple, binary matter and does not lend itself to Red or Blue team jerseys, so simpletons have difficulty grasping it.
This post was edited on 2/4/23 at 7:57 pm
Posted on 2/4/23 at 7:36 pm to Penrod
quote:To an extent, I disagree. I think that a LOT of the "conservative" posters KNOW that their views are in a tiny minority of the general population, feel isolated, and get some sort of validation from comong here specifically to join their herd and virtue-signal how very, very "conservative" they are. I call it the "Ditto Rush" syndrome.quote:What a stupid point. All of the argumentative posts on this board are from people who see posts with which THEY disagree and then argue about
Keep in mind he said he observes threads and when he see views being made that HE judges as wrong he swoops in to provide justice.
They would never survive on a forum where they did not constitute a huge majority of the posters, because THERE they would need to be able to actually defend their views with facts, logic and eloquence ... none of which most of them possess.
It is why they react with such frothing anger to anyone who challenges their views. This is the only place that their views would not make them pariahs, and they just cannot HANDLE having those views questioned even here in their safe space.
This post was edited on 2/5/23 at 6:50 am
Posted on 2/4/23 at 7:38 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:Case in point.
Hanks says it was the bikers fault for running a stop sign.quote:Sure he did. You a literal woman?
No he didn’t. You are either a fool, or you are being juvenile.
"Disagree with me? I need not explain myself or be persuasive in any way. I will just hurl a childish insult and harvest the upvotes."
That sort of thing would get him laughed off of any forum on which his views are not in a monumental majority. And he knows this, which is why he and those like him hide here in their safe space.
This post was edited on 2/4/23 at 7:54 pm
Posted on 2/4/23 at 8:17 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
They would never survive on a forum where they did not constitute a huge majority of the posters,
The irony of this statement coming from a supposed grown man who is permabanned from the Aggie forums.
Popular
Back to top


1




