Started By
Message

re: California emergency room doctor murdered because he had "white privilege"

Posted on 2/4/23 at 6:14 pm to
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
299455 posts
Posted on 2/4/23 at 6:14 pm to
Hanks says it was the bikers fault for running a stop sign.
Posted by Penrod
Member since Jan 2011
55529 posts
Posted on 2/4/23 at 6:15 pm to
quote:

You are the definition of a Narcissist. You contradict everyone because you think you are smarter and wiser than everyone and the fact that you are a liberal

Or how about, he just disagrees?

And Hank is clearly not a political liberal. He is a conservative.
Posted by Mo Jeaux
Member since Aug 2008
63670 posts
Posted on 2/4/23 at 6:16 pm to
quote:

And Hank is clearly not a political liberal. He is a conservative.


Oh for frick’s sake.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
299455 posts
Posted on 2/4/23 at 6:26 pm to
quote:

And Hank is clearly not a political liberal. He is a conservative.


Posted by Penrod
Member since Jan 2011
55529 posts
Posted on 2/4/23 at 6:27 pm to
quote:

Pretty good bet that a physician living in California was a virtue signaling liberal who had completely bought into DIE and voted Democrat every election. Hard to feel sorry for him getting what he voted for.

I bet most doctors in California vote Republican.
Posted by Penrod
Member since Jan 2011
55529 posts
Posted on 2/4/23 at 6:32 pm to
quote:

Keep in mind he said he observes threads and when he see views being made that HE judges as wrong he swoops in to provide justice.

What a stupid point. All of the argumentative posts on this board are from people who see posts with which THEY disagree and then argue about.

Do you think it more reasonable that Hank should argue against things with which he agrees? This gets funnier the more I think about it.
Posted by Penrod
Member since Jan 2011
55529 posts
Posted on 2/4/23 at 6:40 pm to
quote:

Hanks says it was the bikers fault for running a stop sign.

No he didn’t. You are either a fool, or you are being juvenile.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
299455 posts
Posted on 2/4/23 at 6:43 pm to
quote:

Hanks says it was the bikers fault for running a stop sign.

No he didn’t. You are either a fool, or you are being juvenile.
Sure he did. You a literal woman?
Posted by omegaman66
greenwell springs
Member since Oct 2007
27178 posts
Posted on 2/4/23 at 6:45 pm to
quote:

No he didn’t. You are either a fool, or you are being juvenile.


Exactly. Hank didn't say that. Hank threw out suggestions that the biker did something besides what really happened. As usual trying to paint the victim in a negative light and then make the actions of the evil person seem not quite as evil.
Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
59463 posts
Posted on 2/4/23 at 6:47 pm to
quote:

And Hank is clearly not a political liberal. He is a conservative


You are a caricature.
Posted by CountryVolFan
Knoxville, TN
Member since Dec 2008
3076 posts
Posted on 2/4/23 at 6:48 pm to
quote:

You are probably correct. Los Angeles LEOs are probably lying about the evidence they have been able to gather thus far.

JFC


Look man...

I'm completely over this crap. If you want to play board contrian then keep doing that by all means. But what you aren't going to do is put straw man arguments into people's posts and then act morally superior when you out argue the straw man.

People can't even discuss news of interest without you derailing the thread and arguing with yourself in the quotes. Stop doing it.
Posted by SOSFAN
Blythewood
Member since Jun 2018
15807 posts
Posted on 2/4/23 at 6:51 pm to
Penrod white knighting for Pedohank. Why am I not surprised
Posted by Bulldogblitz
In my house
Member since Dec 2018
28161 posts
Posted on 2/4/23 at 7:00 pm to
quote:

Why do you do this?


He enjoys the spotlight. It's why he came back after a year long suspension.
Posted by oogabooga68
Member since Nov 2018
27194 posts
Posted on 2/4/23 at 7:22 pm to
quote:

It's why he came back after a year long suspension.


Dude, he never left.

He continued posting under no less than 3 alters.

Now he WAS permabanned from the Aggie Boards, don't know if he used alters there....

Maybe some of our Aggie friends who post on this board can tell us.
Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
44345 posts
Posted on 2/4/23 at 7:22 pm to
quote:

quote:

My only question is whether "race" was the precipitating factor in this attack, or merely incidental.
Hold on Hank. I’ve been with you so far in this argument, but race was clearly not incidental. It was, at best, a strong factor and at worst, the main cause.
I suppose it depends upon what one means by "incidental."

My point was not whether "race" was "incidental" in the final assault (clearly it was more than that, if one believes the 2nd- and 3rd-hand reports that he screamed about "White Privilege").

My point was that "race" may have been "incidental" in INITIATING the sequence of events. For instance, if some minor traffic-related infraction sent the motorist into a fit of "road rage," it seems doubtful that the race of the cyclist was a major contributing factor in STARTING the conflict. To the contrary, it would have been his ACTIONS (no matter how innocuous).
quote:

It was, at best, a strong factor and at worst, the main cause.
As to the post-ramming (hand-to-hand) assault, I tend to agree with you (subject to the same assumption re "White Privilege").
This post was edited on 2/4/23 at 7:59 pm
Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
44345 posts
Posted on 2/4/23 at 7:26 pm to
quote:

quote:

Hanks says it was the bikers fault for running a stop sign.
No he didn’t. You are either a fool, or you are being juvenile.
I think that I may use words that lie outside Roger's vocabulary, leaving him in a constant state of confusion. In fairness to Roger, he is not the only one.

In this case, I honestly think that Roger did not understand my use of the term "innocuous" to describe whatever action by the cyclist MIGHT have "triggered" the motorist.
This post was edited on 2/4/23 at 8:20 pm
Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
44345 posts
Posted on 2/4/23 at 7:30 pm to
quote:

Hank is clearly not a political liberal. He is a conservative.
The words "conservative" and "liberal" are meaningless these days.

Years and years ago, I used the term "small/limited government conservative" to describe my views regarding the appropriate scope of government. The problem is that the SAME WORD ("conservative") is used to describe the absolutely AUTHORITARIAN veiwpoints of the "social conservatives," so I discarded the use of the word "conservative" from any description of my views. Now, I use "limited government advocate" to describe essentially the same views.

Ideologically on social issues, I fall soundly in the mainstream of libertarian thought, which basically places me Right of most "liberals" and Left of most "conservatives."

It is not a simple, binary matter and does not lend itself to Red or Blue team jerseys, so simpletons have difficulty grasping it.
This post was edited on 2/4/23 at 7:57 pm
Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
44345 posts
Posted on 2/4/23 at 7:36 pm to
quote:

quote:

Keep in mind he said he observes threads and when he see views being made that HE judges as wrong he swoops in to provide justice.
What a stupid point. All of the argumentative posts on this board are from people who see posts with which THEY disagree and then argue about
To an extent, I disagree. I think that a LOT of the "conservative" posters KNOW that their views are in a tiny minority of the general population, feel isolated, and get some sort of validation from comong here specifically to join their herd and virtue-signal how very, very "conservative" they are. I call it the "Ditto Rush" syndrome.

They would never survive on a forum where they did not constitute a huge majority of the posters, because THERE they would need to be able to actually defend their views with facts, logic and eloquence ... none of which most of them possess.

It is why they react with such frothing anger to anyone who challenges their views. This is the only place that their views would not make them pariahs, and they just cannot HANDLE having those views questioned even here in their safe space.
This post was edited on 2/5/23 at 6:50 am
Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
44345 posts
Posted on 2/4/23 at 7:38 pm to
quote:

Hanks says it was the bikers fault for running a stop sign.
quote:

No he didn’t. You are either a fool, or you are being juvenile.
Sure he did. You a literal woman?
Case in point.

"Disagree with me? I need not explain myself or be persuasive in any way. I will just hurl a childish insult and harvest the upvotes."

That sort of thing would get him laughed off of any forum on which his views are not in a monumental majority. And he knows this, which is why he and those like him hide here in their safe space.
This post was edited on 2/4/23 at 7:54 pm
Posted by oogabooga68
Member since Nov 2018
27194 posts
Posted on 2/4/23 at 8:17 pm to
quote:

They would never survive on a forum where they did not constitute a huge majority of the posters,


The irony of this statement coming from a supposed grown man who is permabanned from the Aggie forums.
first pageprev pagePage 10 of 11Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram