- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Cali Senate Democrats Rejected Bill to Make Purchasing 16, 17-year-olds for Sex a Felony
Posted on 4/17/24 at 10:19 am
Posted on 4/17/24 at 10:19 am
quote:
Democrats rejected Bill authored by Sen. Shannon Grove to make the buying of children for sex a prison felony, and hijacked her bill forcing hostile amendments by denying Grove’s efforts to protect 16 and 17-year-old children from being purchased as part of commercial sex trafficking.
Under the amended bill now solicitation of 16 and 17 year-olds will remain a misdemeanor, punishable by as little as 2 days in jail or up to a $10,000 fine.
Grove’s bill would make solicitation, attempting to engage or engaging in sex with a minor for money a felony with a prison sentence ranging from 2 to 4 years, a fine not exceeding $25,000, and registration as a sex offender. The bill would punish all those who solicit from a child, regardless of whether or not the person knew or reasonably should have known that the person solicited was a minor.
LINK
The party of pedophiles
11
Posted on 4/17/24 at 10:20 am to stout
Funny how the side which has never met a law it didn’t want to pass draws the line here.
Posted on 4/17/24 at 10:23 am to stout
Well, Democrats see children as sexual objects so…
Posted on 4/17/24 at 10:24 am to stout
I’m waiting for SFP and Hanks new alt to tell me why this bill was a bad thing.
Posted on 4/17/24 at 10:25 am to stout
Reddy Tiger is Giddy Tiger after reading this.
Posted on 4/17/24 at 10:27 am to stout
Democrat voters love their pedophiles. Many here are starting to openly admit it, which is a refreshing change.
Democrats LOVE passing laws, but draw the line here. LOLOLOL
Democrats LOVE passing laws, but draw the line here. LOLOLOL
Posted on 4/17/24 at 10:33 am to stout
tarzana's feel good thread of the day.
Posted on 4/17/24 at 10:38 am to stout
SFP, Hank, and Tarzana are masturbating furiously to this while browsing Expedia for plane tickets to Cali.
Posted on 4/17/24 at 10:46 am to stout
quote:The bill addressed soliciting sex from 16 and 17 year old minors in exchange for money. It does not "go after" the pimps. It "goes after" the johns.
bill would make solicitation, attempting to engage or engaging in sex with a minor for money a felony with a prison sentence ranging from 2 to 4 years, a fine not exceeding $25,000, and registration as a sex offender. The bill would punish all those who solicit from a child, regardless of whether or not the person knew or reasonably should have known that the person solicited was a minor.
If the bill had just elevated that extant crime from a high-level misdemeanor to a felony, it would probably have passed. The highlighted language (removal of the mens rea requirement) was probably what killed the bill. It is not unreasonable to ask whether a person should spend ten years on the Registry, when (s)he did not have any reason to believe that the prostitute was a 17 rather than 18.
This post was edited on 4/17/24 at 10:59 am
Posted on 4/17/24 at 10:47 am to stout
They are just trying to create jobs to get ahead of the recession they created! 
This post was edited on 4/17/24 at 10:52 am
Posted on 4/17/24 at 10:52 am to stout
“You bunch of conspiracy theorists. This isn’t happening. And when it does, it’s the government trying to make this the new War on Drugs. You’re all being played. I’ve been talking about this on this site for 27 years. ”
Signed,
SFP
” Signed,
SFP
Posted on 4/17/24 at 11:12 am to stout
don't allow them to weasle word this....
purchasing a human being is called SLAVERY
and because minors cannot legally consent to sex, they're not prostitutes it's CHILD RAPE
Colorado did this same thing a month ago and it was shocking how brazenly the demon-crats fought againt it despite the testimonies of kids well under the age cited here. One in particular recalled being sold over 400 times in a single year to be raped. I make no apologies whatsoever, and it's not hyperbole, for saying that these people should be fed into a wood chipper feet first
purchasing a human being is called SLAVERY
and because minors cannot legally consent to sex, they're not prostitutes it's CHILD RAPE
Colorado did this same thing a month ago and it was shocking how brazenly the demon-crats fought againt it despite the testimonies of kids well under the age cited here. One in particular recalled being sold over 400 times in a single year to be raped. I make no apologies whatsoever, and it's not hyperbole, for saying that these people should be fed into a wood chipper feet first
This post was edited on 4/17/24 at 11:20 am
Posted on 4/17/24 at 11:23 am to Don Quixote
quote:Read the bill, not the OP's headline. The bill addresses solicitation for sex, not chattel slavery,
don't allow them to weasle word this....purchasing a human being is called SLAVERY
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News