- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Breaking: Supreme Court Blocks Trump’s Use of Alien Enemies Act to Deport Illegals
Posted on 4/19/25 at 6:27 pm to boosiebadazz
Posted on 4/19/25 at 6:27 pm to boosiebadazz
No, because had a dem president done this exact same thing, no judge would have intervened and the people would be thrilled because we all want these motherfrickers gone. Obama deported everyone and I can’t recall a single court challenge- and if the right were hypocrites, they certainly could have come up with something.
Next question.
Next question.
0
Posted on 4/19/25 at 6:28 pm to Vacherie Saint
I give the poliboard credit for one thing. A number of you guys have basically admitted, Dems are going to do whatever they want when they are in power, so Trump has to floor it and break eggs to make as many omelets as possible right now. I respect that. But, like boosie and SFP have been saying, you can't get mad when flags are thrown while he pushes the legal envelope.
A lot of people here keep whining about how a single district judge can stop a president. Well, look at this.
A lot of people here keep whining about how a single district judge can stop a president. Well, look at this.
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.This post was edited on 4/19/25 at 7:32 pm
Posted on 4/19/25 at 6:31 pm to Bunk Moreland
Posted on 4/19/25 at 6:32 pm to Bunk Moreland
Ok? They've been doing this shite for 30 years already. Where have you been?
You want to fight with one hand tied behind your back while your opponent has a gun, be my guest.
But let me be crystal clear…. The only thing political about this story is the lawfare. It sure AF isn’t the deportations.
You want to fight with one hand tied behind your back while your opponent has a gun, be my guest.
But let me be crystal clear…. The only thing political about this story is the lawfare. It sure AF isn’t the deportations.
This post was edited on 4/19/25 at 6:33 pm
Posted on 4/19/25 at 6:33 pm to Vacherie Saint
That's fair. I understand the mindset.
Posted on 4/19/25 at 6:34 pm to Bunk Moreland
Posted on 4/19/25 at 6:35 pm to imjustafatkid
Well, one guy is breaking out statutes that haven't been used in 100 years.
Posted on 4/19/25 at 6:36 pm to imjustafatkid
Yes but Bunk Moreland is very concerned that it’s the RIGHT opening a can of worms.
Posted on 4/19/25 at 6:37 pm to Bunk Moreland
quote:
Well, one guy is breaking out statutes that haven't been used in 100 years.
Not sure how this would affect the legitimacy of a statute. Explain.
Posted on 4/19/25 at 6:40 pm to Bunk Moreland
So? Write your congressman if you don’t want laws to be used.
Have we had a government sponsored invasion of 8MM foreign nationals over 4 years in the last 100 years? Have we had hostile foreign countries emptying their jails and sending their gangbangers here in the last 100 years?
Have we had a government sponsored invasion of 8MM foreign nationals over 4 years in the last 100 years? Have we had hostile foreign countries emptying their jails and sending their gangbangers here in the last 100 years?
Posted on 4/19/25 at 6:47 pm to imjustafatkid
quote:
Disingenuous nonsense. Citizens and illegal aliens are not the same, and never will be.
I see you’re still allergic to reading Supreme Court opinions on the topic.
Posted on 4/19/25 at 7:02 pm to ChatGPT of LA
quote:
Just wanna confirm, you want illegal criminals to stay in our borders, when they have countries that they are citizens of that are not US?
It's a yes or no
*crickets*
Posted on 4/19/25 at 7:13 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:
Really, do you not see the danger in setting aside the only constitutional constriants that prohibit the executive to implement policy at will?
I do see it, but the other option is to give up and die. What is the other choice?
Posted on 4/19/25 at 7:30 pm to djsdawg
quote:
I do see it, but the other option is to give up and die
No it's not.
False choice fallacy.
If only there were numerous examples of this exact false choice fallacy being used for NPCs as yourself willing to believe it.
Posted on 4/19/25 at 7:44 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:
I see you’re still allergic to reading Supreme Court opinions on the topic.
The Supreme Court has clearly established that foreign nationals and citizens are not the same. As does the Constitution and immigration law.
Posted on 4/19/25 at 7:45 pm to JimEverett
It’s literally page 3 of the opinion I linked
Posted on 4/19/25 at 7:47 pm to boosiebadazz
What is? That citizens and foreign nationals are the same under U.S. law? I am certain that is not there.
Posted on 4/19/25 at 7:47 pm to JimEverett
I can’t do the reading for you.
Posted on 4/19/25 at 7:48 pm to imjustafatkid
That just destroyed Bunk Moreland's horse shite right above it.
Posted on 4/19/25 at 7:51 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
No it's not. False choice fallacy. If only there were numerous examples of this exact false choice fallacy being used for NPCs as yourself willing to believe it.
I disagree, but perhaps you cons convince me of another option. This is all about defeating liberal evil, and the constitution, of all things, is apparently preventing that from occurring.
Page 29 of 32
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News