- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: BREAKING: Pelosi to announce formal impeachment inquiry into President Trump - @howardfine
Posted on 9/24/19 at 1:20 pm to tigerinDC09
Posted on 9/24/19 at 1:20 pm to tigerinDC09
quote:
Reports suggest

Posted on 9/24/19 at 1:21 pm to tigerinDC09
quote:
Release the Whistleblower report and we'll know for sure.
You guys are worse than a guy at last call that has already taken 2 Viagra and has no one to go home with. You'd think you would have learned by now.
Posted on 9/24/19 at 1:21 pm to Y.A. Tittle
Looks like we'll need to dust off ol' Robert Mueller and let him earn a few more million on a second investigation.
Posted on 9/24/19 at 1:22 pm to Scruffy
quote:
And how can reports suggest something when no one has seen it?
Of course people have seen it.
You believe that the whistleblower didn't have access to the transcript, yet don't believe that the report mentions a pattern of Trump's actions?
Both came from reporting.
Posted on 9/24/19 at 1:24 pm to tigerinDC09
quote:
You believe that the whistleblower didn't have access to the transcript,
Yes
Posted on 9/24/19 at 1:24 pm to tigerinDC09
quote:
tigerinDC09
At least you're consistent.
Posted on 9/24/19 at 1:26 pm to tigerinDC09
quote:
So how is it that you know that the whistleblower didn't have direct access to the transcript?
And? What does it fricking matter? The actual transcripts will be released.
Posted on 9/24/19 at 1:53 pm to tigerinDC09
quote:
Reports suggest
Reports suggest.

Posted on 9/24/19 at 1:53 pm to tigerinDC09
Look at yourself.
You argued for pages over the weekend that NOTHING in regard to Biden's activities with the Ukraine and the Burisma Holdings investigation rose to your standard of probable cause. You ignored reports that Ukrainian officials have been trying to get the DOJ to hear evidence on DNC collusion and corruption since 2016. Now you have yourself convinced that the goddam duly elected POTUS should be impeached over a media interpretation of a second-hand, unreleased report from a whistleblower describing perfectly legal foreign policy. Look at yourself... you are the problem.
You argued for pages over the weekend that NOTHING in regard to Biden's activities with the Ukraine and the Burisma Holdings investigation rose to your standard of probable cause. You ignored reports that Ukrainian officials have been trying to get the DOJ to hear evidence on DNC collusion and corruption since 2016. Now you have yourself convinced that the goddam duly elected POTUS should be impeached over a media interpretation of a second-hand, unreleased report from a whistleblower describing perfectly legal foreign policy. Look at yourself... you are the problem.
Posted on 9/24/19 at 1:54 pm to KiwiHead
quote:
This is not the same thing and you damned well know this Nixon was part of the cover up of a crime. This is not a crime. This may be unseemly, but it is not a crime, the President can ask a FOREIGN LEADER to provide him with something for something even something like this and it is TOTALLY LEGAL!!!!!!!!!!!!! I'm missing the statute that gives Congress power of the conduct and execution of foreign affairs
Illegal <> impeachable
Also, Rudy G already admitted that it was not foreign policy and was for the benefit of the Trump campaign.
I wonder how republicans would react if a dem president was allegedly using his position to dig up political dirt on the opposition party
Posted on 9/24/19 at 2:01 pm to bmy
quote:
I wonder how republicans would react if a dem president was allegedly using his position to dig up political dirt on the opposition party
Uh.... you know that literally happened what... 3 years ago?
Posted on 9/24/19 at 2:01 pm to VoxDawg
And bmy, the Government employee, strikes again, with his Democratic viewpoint 
Posted on 9/24/19 at 2:03 pm to bmy
quote:
I wonder how republicans would react if a dem president was allegedly using his position to dig up political dirt on the opposition party
Or better yet, weaponizing the IRS against them.
Posted on 9/24/19 at 2:03 pm to SSpaniel
quote:
Uh.... you know that literally happened what... 3 years ago?
How did republicans react?
Posted on 9/24/19 at 2:05 pm to bmy
quote:
I wonder how republicans would react if a dem president was allegedly using his position to dig up political dirt on the opposition party
Exactly like we have been acting the entire time we've been trying to get justice for those guilty of the Spygate spying on DJT's campaign and administration.
No need to wonder.
Posted on 9/24/19 at 2:10 pm to bmy
quote:
I wonder how republicans would react if a dem president was allegedly using his position to dig up political dirt on the opposition party
Difference here is the Dems paid to manufacture evidence on Russia/Trump (see Fusion GPS, Deep State planted spies like Mifsud, etc.). Imagine if Trump was on a transcript with groups like that talking about manufacturing evidence?
Your hypocrisy knows no bounds.
Posted on 9/24/19 at 2:11 pm to VoxDawg
quote:
Exactly like we have been acting the entire time we've been trying to get justice for those guilty of the Spygate spying on DJT's campaign and administration.
No need to wonder.
Yet you don't take these allegations seriously at all
There's nothing illegal about it. Somebody could say it's improper. And this isn't foreign policy — I'm asking them to do an investigation... because that information will be very, very helpful to my client.." Rudy G.
This post was edited on 9/24/19 at 2:20 pm
Popular
Back to top



0










