- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Breaking: D.C. Court of Appeals rejects Michael Flynn’s effort to have charges dismissed
Posted on 8/31/20 at 8:19 pm to boomtown143
Posted on 8/31/20 at 8:19 pm to boomtown143
quote:7 days or in between before the release of the Durham report.
so Durham is chugging along.
Posted on 8/31/20 at 8:21 pm to CDawson
quote:
Possibly the single most corrupt action I have ever seen from a "court of law".
Disgusting.
At least everyone knows that there is really no such thing as "justice"
Posted on 8/31/20 at 8:41 pm to HailToTheChiz
Are they overturning Fokker?
Posted on 8/31/20 at 8:50 pm to Junky
quote:
Are they overturning Fokker?
not....yet
Sullivan is dancing right up to that line though
Posted on 8/31/20 at 8:57 pm to cajunangelle
quote:
He can't fire Barr or Wray 8 weeks before the election. The media/democrats would adore this.
bullshite
Wray should have been fired at any point in the last 3 years
The Dim's don't like Barr anyway
I'm tired of this election excuse bullshite. Are Dim's gonna start supporting Trump if he doesn't fire them? Are they gonna burn more buildings if he does?
Posted on 9/1/20 at 7:46 am to Hurricane Mike
Again, did not read the opinion but I’m guessing the gist of it is in some circumstances the judge can discover the reason for nolle prosse even though very little can be done. One argument is the ability to sanction the government for their actions if appropriate
We shall see. Whatever games being played, as others have said, doubt resolution before election
We shall see. Whatever games being played, as others have said, doubt resolution before election
Posted on 9/1/20 at 7:57 am to dafif
quote:
did not read the opinion
of the en banc?
Here's a pretty quick summary
The appeals court basically ignored the amicus issue and the reassignment. They also steered clear of any Separation of Powers Rule 48 issues.
They reversed the earlier order of mandamus because they said that other relief was still an option. Their ruling stated that the defendant would only seek relief via mandamus when there is no other option. Alot of judges protecting judges here
They also insinuated that if the DOJ had sought the mandamus, instead of the defense, the issue of SoP was at play, and they may have been inclined to rule for dismissal. They also dropped a dime in there, that should Sullivan fail to follow Rule 48 this time around, if the prosecution were to file for mandamus, they would likely issue it immediately.
quote:
Whatever games being played, as others have said, doubt resolution before election
well, there is an order to Sullivan directly to act with "dispatch" - they expect him to move quick. We'll see, hopefully within a couple weeks
This post was edited on 9/1/20 at 8:01 am
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News