Started By
Message

re: Breaking: Barr directs fed government to reinstate death penalty, 5 ordered executed

Posted on 7/25/19 at 3:47 pm to
Posted by WeeWee
Member since Aug 2012
45554 posts
Posted on 7/25/19 at 3:47 pm to
quote:

Does this mean Treason's back on the menu boys?




Can I be the one to flip the switch on Jim Comey when he is riding ole sparky?
Posted by Hurricane Mike
Member since Jun 2008
20059 posts
Posted on 7/25/19 at 3:48 pm to
quote:

Allegedly there's a video


Allegedly from the Q thread, reddit, and the chan's

That's a whole different definition of allegedly
This post was edited on 7/25/19 at 3:49 pm
Posted by germandawg
Member since Sep 2012
14135 posts
Posted on 7/25/19 at 3:57 pm to
Exactly what we need....the state executing people. We have such a stellar record as a nation for getting this right....We've executed about 1500 people since the early '70s and releases about 150 from death row who were wrongly convicted. Lets say half of those were really guilty ...hell lets say 90% of them were...so 135 were indeed guilty...that still means that each and everyone of us who were alive at the time would have allowed the state to murder 15 innocent people had there not been something in the system which lead us to realize we had the wrong person.

I get it. You read the list of crimes these people committed and they deserve to die....but if use the math available to us 1/2 of one of these 5 is not guilty.....when we have executed 10 we will have mathematically probably executed an innocent person....at least innocent of the crime they were convicted of....that is some old bullshite that should not be tolerated in decent society.....
Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
44345 posts
Posted on 7/25/19 at 4:05 pm to
I am of two minds on the death penalty.

My gut reaction is that certain people simply do not have any continuing, ongoing right to live, after they have committed acts of a particularly heinous nature.

On the other hand, the objective side of me really does try to actually look at facts.

First, juries make mistakes, And I do have some concern about executing innocent individuals.

Second, the litigation cost of executing a prisoner tends to exceed the cost of simply warehousing him for the remainder of his life. The fiscal conservative in me abhors the waste.
Posted by LSURussian
Member since Feb 2005
134885 posts
Posted on 7/25/19 at 4:17 pm to
quote:

when we have executed 10 we will have mathematically probably executed an innocent person.
And probably allowed 100+ guilty ones to go free.....
Posted by ThePTExperience1969
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Apr 2016
13360 posts
Posted on 7/25/19 at 4:32 pm to
The 5th Amendment:

"No person shall be...deprived of LIFE, liberty, or property, without due process of law"

Is what it is, baby
Posted by NYNolaguy1
Member since May 2011
21764 posts
Posted on 7/25/19 at 4:51 pm to
quote:

Maybe we should let the families decide what to do with them...death, or torture, or both?


You must be one of those small govt republican types to have so much faith in a govt that can arbitrarily decide guilt.
Posted by gthog61
Irving, TX
Member since Nov 2009
71001 posts
Posted on 7/25/19 at 5:00 pm to
Those people released from death row were mostly due to dna that we now have. If that was available back then a large swath would not have been convicted

Your numbers are irrelevant going forward
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
128778 posts
Posted on 7/25/19 at 5:57 pm to
quote:

when we have executed 10 we will have mathematically probably executed an innocent person...


Every post you make is some of the dumbest shite ever typed out. fricking idiot.
Posted by Goforit
Member since Apr 2019
8757 posts
Posted on 7/25/19 at 6:05 pm to
Anyone convicted of treason and trying to overthrow the Trump presidency should pay the ultimate price.
Posted by NYNolaguy1
Member since May 2011
21764 posts
Posted on 7/25/19 at 6:06 pm to
quote:

Those people released from death row were mostly due to dna that we now have. If that was available back then a large swath would not have been convicted

Your numbers are irrelevant going forward


You'll have to forgive me if I remain skeptical at whom my govt tells me is innocent or guilty.

I simply dont have enough faith that the same govt that has difficulty balancing a budget and counting people suddenly is perfect in determining absolute guilt every time without question.

This, especially in light of the political trials that just ended with Mueller and company. You would think that given the folks that were just prosecuted that the small govt folks might realize that there are other reasons to prosecute someone rather than finding the truth.
Posted by troyt37
Member since Mar 2008
14682 posts
Posted on 7/25/19 at 8:57 pm to
quote:

You must be one of those small govt republican types to have so much faith in a govt that can arbitrarily decide guilt.


What is arbitrary about being found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, by a jury of 12 people? Is it arbitrary to go through a process of appeals that takes years, and very often decades? Do you not know what arbitrary means?
This post was edited on 7/25/19 at 8:59 pm
Posted by Rhino5
Atlanta
Member since Nov 2014
30963 posts
Posted on 7/25/19 at 9:04 pm to
quote:

Same

Although I won't be losing any sleep over these executions.

You’re going to have to make up your mind.

I hate the idea of an entity deciding fate, but I do believe there’s a sect of humanity with an evil side to them. One that doesn’t belong with productive members of society.
Posted by Bleeding purple
Athens, Texas
Member since Sep 2007
25348 posts
Posted on 7/25/19 at 9:12 pm to
quote:

. I oppose because it doesn't deter anything.


Except recidivism.
Posted by NYNolaguy1
Member since May 2011
21764 posts
Posted on 7/26/19 at 8:22 am to
quote:

What is arbitrary about being found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, by a jury of 12 people?


I am guessing you know very little about our judicial system if you think 12 jurors agreeing on something makes it true.
Posted by VoxDawg
Glory, Glory
Member since Sep 2012
77627 posts
Posted on 7/26/19 at 8:23 am to
quote:

Except recidivism.


100% prevention rate.
Posted by Bengalbio
Member since Feb 2017
2204 posts
Posted on 7/26/19 at 8:55 am to
Facts: costs more; innocents executed; not a deterrent; vindictive and painful.

What's not to love about this move?
Posted by troyt37
Member since Mar 2008
14682 posts
Posted on 7/26/19 at 12:20 pm to
quote:

I am guessing you know very little about our judicial system if you think 12 jurors agreeing on something makes it true.


I didn’t say it made it true, genius. I said it makes it decidedly not arbitrary.
Posted by ShortyRob
Member since Oct 2008
82116 posts
Posted on 7/26/19 at 12:26 pm to
I literally never understand conservatives, especially those who recognize that govt is untrustworthy, supporting the death penalty.

I think people get too wrapped up int he emotional aspect of it and think all of us who oppose it are bleeding hearts.

But make no mistake. I have absolutely ZERO moral opposition to the death penalty. If I knew, for certain, that you raped and murdered a child, I'd pull the switch myself. And smile as I did it.

Alas, the reality is, we REALLLLLLY suck at meting out punishment in the US and this isn't because the US sucks. It's because humans are, well, human.

The reality is, LOTS of shite unrelated to guilt or innocence play a roll in whether a jury finds you guilty. People like to think it's only race, but the reality is, Denzel Washington on trial for murder stands a MUCH better chance with exact equal facts than some white dude with tattoos on his face.

Of course there's money

Then, there's shady prosecutors

Barely competent defense attorneys.

And, sometimes, just REALLY unfortunate facts that seem to tell us something that isn't actually true

Bottom line, we get it wrong and while we get it right far more often, we get it wrong WAY too much for anyone sane to be comfortable with the death penalty.
This post was edited on 7/26/19 at 12:28 pm
Posted by troyt37
Member since Mar 2008
14682 posts
Posted on 7/26/19 at 12:45 pm to
Which is why I think the death penalty should only be sought when the evidence is unimpeachable, which is not too far from where we are now.
first pageprev pagePage 9 of 10Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram