Started By
Message

re: BREAKING - Trump to release first phone call with Ukraine Pres.

Posted on 11/12/19 at 4:52 am to
Posted by gthog61
Irving, TX
Member since Nov 2009
71001 posts
Posted on 11/12/19 at 4:52 am to
You have yet to post anything worth replying to. You are a habitual liar and I give you the effort you warrant
Posted by Possumslayer
Pascagoula
Member since Jan 2018
6474 posts
Posted on 11/12/19 at 4:55 am to
Biden said he wasn’t interested in facts..... remember?
Posted by i am dan
NC
Member since Aug 2011
30540 posts
Posted on 11/12/19 at 6:15 am to
quote:

OSU is the best team. Doesn’t mean they can’t , or even won’t have a bad day and lose this thing.

But if they bring their A game and ANY other team brings theirs.. the Bucks win this year!


Let's declassify Obama's and Hillary's shite and see how they did things.

Wouln't you like to know if these high ranking officials did some questionable things?

Let's do it.
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
112707 posts
Posted on 11/12/19 at 8:44 am to
quote:

quote: I think he should instead release the missing parts of the second phone call first. After all, that is the most important call./quote] [quote]STILL lying Still acting like a dumb arse, afraid to post anything but crap.


Here are some facts for you Tex: LINK

quote:

Indeed, Vindman attested to the overall accuracy of the rough transcript, contrary to some impeachment supporters who have suggested the White House is hiding an exact transcript that would reveal everything Trump said to the Ukrainian president. As one of a half-dozen White House note-takers listening to the call, Vindman testified that he tried unsuccessfully to make a few edits to the rough transcript as it was being prepared. In particular, Vindman believed that Zelensky specifically said the word "Burisma," the corrupt Ukrainian energy company that hired Hunter Biden, when the rough transcript referred only to "the company." But beyond that, Vindman had no problems with the transcript, and he specifically said he did not believe any changes were made with ill intent.

"You don't think there was any malicious intent to specifically not add those edits?" asked Republican counsel Steve Castor.

"I don't think so."

"So otherwise, this record is complete and I think you used the term 'very accurate'?"

"Yes," said Vindman.
Posted by TheBoo
South to Louisiana
Member since Aug 2012
5399 posts
Posted on 11/12/19 at 8:46 am to
quote:

I think he should instead release the missing parts of the second phone call first. After all, that is the most important call.


It sounds like you need to be deposed behind closed doors in Washington, because you already seem to have more evidence than any other "witnesses".
Posted by ChineseBandit58
Pearland, TX
Member since Aug 2005
48130 posts
Posted on 11/12/19 at 9:19 am to
quote:

What be funny is when this call shows that it was the Ukrainian President was the one to bring up corruption with American officials and how they were unable to get evidence of this to the DOJ because of Obama leftovers.


/\ THIS /\ is my favorite dream now.

Let it be so.
Posted by ChineseBandit58
Pearland, TX
Member since Aug 2005
48130 posts
Posted on 11/12/19 at 9:21 am to
quote:

missing parts of the second phone call first.


You mean those parts spoken in Ukrainian? and the translations into and from English??


THOSE missing parts???

:rotflmao:
Posted by bamarep
Member since Nov 2013
52363 posts
Posted on 11/12/19 at 9:28 am to
I see dick rider is denying facts again.
Posted by Yak
DuPage County
Member since May 2014
4672 posts
Posted on 11/12/19 at 9:31 am to
quote:

/\ THIS /\ is my favorite dream now.

Let it be so.
I think you're getting the calls mixed up - this first call has nothing of the sort
Posted by xxTIMMYxx
Member since Aug 2019
17562 posts
Posted on 11/12/19 at 9:35 am to
quote:

Not believing the lie that Trump is the most transparent does not equal perpetuating lies


Tallest midget
Posted by Govt Tide
Member since Nov 2009
9539 posts
Posted on 11/12/19 at 9:43 am to
quote:

well sure when you put it that way it looks pretty bad for don from queens

fortunately there’s lots of insane alternative fact explanations



I can only imagine how crazy the spin is in whatever echo spin chamber you and your fellow Trump haters get get your information.

There is a literal transcript of the infamous Ukraine call where no mention of any holding up of military aid is anywhere in the call yet you guys have been gaslit into believing it's there when it clearly isn't. It's frickin amazing the lengths you guys go to in your hopes of taking out Trump. You're willing to invent s### out of thin air if that's what it takes. Amazing
Posted by texridder
The Woodlands, TX
Member since Oct 2017
14936 posts
Posted on 11/12/19 at 9:21 pm to
quote:

I think he should instead release the missing parts of the second phone call first. After all, that is the most important call.
quote:

muh ellipses

quote:

President Zelenskyy: I wanted to tell you about the prosecutor. First off, I understand and I’m knowledgeable about the situation. Since we have on the absolute majority in our Parliament; the next prosecutor general will be 100% my person, my candidate, who will be approved by the parliament and will start as a new prosecutor in September. He or she will look into the situation, specifically to the company that you mentioned in this issue.

Tell me, muh ellipses, what company is Zelensky referring to that Trump mentioned?
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
112707 posts
Posted on 11/12/19 at 9:26 pm to
quote:

Tell me, muh ellipses, what company is Zelensky referring to that Trump mentioned?


I refer you to my post above on this page.
Posted by texridder
The Woodlands, TX
Member since Oct 2017
14936 posts
Posted on 11/12/19 at 9:31 pm to
quote:

You mean those parts spoken in Ukrainian? and the translations into and from English??

Yea, they probably had the translator from the AT&T commercial -- you know, the one who says his Dutch is "O.K."

He probably had trouble with the translation. His Ukrainian is probably just O.K, too.

Try again.
Posted by Speckhunter2012
Lake Charles
Member since Dec 2012
8172 posts
Posted on 11/12/19 at 9:33 pm to
quote:

Try again.


Fail. It is going to be Glorious this next year.

Stay Tuned Loser
Posted by texridder
The Woodlands, TX
Member since Oct 2017
14936 posts
Posted on 11/12/19 at 9:42 pm to
quote:

Fail. It is going to be Glorious this next year.

Do you ever actually respond to a post, or do you always just post this gibberish?
Posted by TbirdSpur2010
ALAMO CITY
Member since Dec 2010
134141 posts
Posted on 11/12/19 at 9:47 pm to
quote:

I am sure you will find it tantalizing!


This is amazing
Posted by texridder
The Woodlands, TX
Member since Oct 2017
14936 posts
Posted on 11/12/19 at 9:52 pm to
quote:

What be funny is when this call shows that it was the Ukrainian President was the one to bring up corruption with American officials and how they were unable to get evidence of this to the DOJ because of Obama leftovers.

The internet in Ukraine must have been down.

And the phone lines must have been out, too.
Posted by CheniereTiger108
Member since Jul 2014
1660 posts
Posted on 11/12/19 at 10:09 pm to
quote:

Being transparent would be to release the entire recording. He will not release the recording.


There is no “recording.” At least one of the Dems *star* witnesses confirmed as much in his hearing.

Name another president that has released a transcript of their call with a foreign leader when the subject of their conversation was called into question. Has Quid Pro Joe volunteered to release transcripts of his calls with Ukraine to prove he wasn’t extorting them?? If not, why not? What about Barry- the self proclaimed “most transparent president in history”?? Where are the call transcripts with Iran leaders when he negotiated that totally “above board” Nuclear Deal requiring pallets of cash being sent in secret??

Posted by texridder
The Woodlands, TX
Member since Oct 2017
14936 posts
Posted on 11/12/19 at 10:11 pm to
quote:

Here are some facts for you Tex:

So, whatever the Washington Examiner says are facts??

Give me a break.

How come they didn't even mention the fact that Vindman said the transcript also left out Trump's mention of the Biden video??

And tell me, in the call, which Ukrainian prosecutor was Trump referring to?
first pageprev pagePage 6 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram