- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 11/12/19 at 4:55 am to wookalar1013
Biden said he wasn’t interested in facts..... remember?
Posted on 11/12/19 at 6:15 am to Spirit Of Aggieland
quote:
OSU is the best team. Doesn’t mean they can’t , or even won’t have a bad day and lose this thing.
But if they bring their A game and ANY other team brings theirs.. the Bucks win this year!
Let's declassify Obama's and Hillary's shite and see how they did things.
Wouln't you like to know if these high ranking officials did some questionable things?
Let's do it.
Posted on 11/12/19 at 8:44 am to texridder
quote:
quote: I think he should instead release the missing parts of the second phone call first. After all, that is the most important call./quote] [quote]STILL lying Still acting like a dumb arse, afraid to post anything but crap.
Here are some facts for you Tex: LINK
quote:
Indeed, Vindman attested to the overall accuracy of the rough transcript, contrary to some impeachment supporters who have suggested the White House is hiding an exact transcript that would reveal everything Trump said to the Ukrainian president. As one of a half-dozen White House note-takers listening to the call, Vindman testified that he tried unsuccessfully to make a few edits to the rough transcript as it was being prepared. In particular, Vindman believed that Zelensky specifically said the word "Burisma," the corrupt Ukrainian energy company that hired Hunter Biden, when the rough transcript referred only to "the company." But beyond that, Vindman had no problems with the transcript, and he specifically said he did not believe any changes were made with ill intent.
"You don't think there was any malicious intent to specifically not add those edits?" asked Republican counsel Steve Castor.
"I don't think so."
"So otherwise, this record is complete and I think you used the term 'very accurate'?"
"Yes," said Vindman.
Posted on 11/12/19 at 8:46 am to texridder
quote:
I think he should instead release the missing parts of the second phone call first. After all, that is the most important call.
It sounds like you need to be deposed behind closed doors in Washington, because you already seem to have more evidence than any other "witnesses".
Posted on 11/12/19 at 9:19 am to Bwmdx
quote:
What be funny is when this call shows that it was the Ukrainian President was the one to bring up corruption with American officials and how they were unable to get evidence of this to the DOJ because of Obama leftovers.
/\ THIS /\ is my favorite dream now.
Let it be so.
Posted on 11/12/19 at 9:21 am to texridder
quote:
missing parts of the second phone call first.
You mean those parts spoken in Ukrainian? and the translations into and from English??
THOSE missing parts???
Posted on 11/12/19 at 9:28 am to ChineseBandit58
I see dick rider is denying facts again.
Posted on 11/12/19 at 9:31 am to ChineseBandit58
quote:I think you're getting the calls mixed up - this first call has nothing of the sort
/\ THIS /\ is my favorite dream now.
Let it be so.
Posted on 11/12/19 at 9:35 am to Spirit Of Aggieland
quote:
Not believing the lie that Trump is the most transparent does not equal perpetuating lies
Tallest midget
Posted on 11/12/19 at 9:43 am to wookalar1013
quote:
well sure when you put it that way it looks pretty bad for don from queens
fortunately there’s lots of insane alternative fact explanations
I can only imagine how crazy the spin is in whatever echo spin chamber you and your fellow Trump haters get get your information.
There is a literal transcript of the infamous Ukraine call where no mention of any holding up of military aid is anywhere in the call yet you guys have been gaslit into believing it's there when it clearly isn't. It's frickin amazing the lengths you guys go to in your hopes of taking out Trump. You're willing to invent s### out of thin air if that's what it takes. Amazing
Posted on 11/12/19 at 9:21 pm to FearlessFreep
quote:
I think he should instead release the missing parts of the second phone call first. After all, that is the most important call.
quote:
muh ellipses
quote:
President Zelenskyy: I wanted to tell you about the prosecutor. First off, I understand and I’m knowledgeable about the situation. Since we have on the absolute majority in our Parliament; the next prosecutor general will be 100% my person, my candidate, who will be approved by the parliament and will start as a new prosecutor in September. He or she will look into the situation, specifically to the company that you mentioned in this issue.
Tell me, muh ellipses, what company is Zelensky referring to that Trump mentioned?
Posted on 11/12/19 at 9:26 pm to texridder
quote:
Tell me, muh ellipses, what company is Zelensky referring to that Trump mentioned?
I refer you to my post above on this page.
Posted on 11/12/19 at 9:31 pm to ChineseBandit58
quote:
You mean those parts spoken in Ukrainian? and the translations into and from English??
Yea, they probably had the translator from the AT&T commercial -- you know, the one who says his Dutch is "O.K."
He probably had trouble with the translation. His Ukrainian is probably just O.K, too.
Try again.
Posted on 11/12/19 at 9:33 pm to texridder
quote:
Try again.
Fail. It is going to be Glorious this next year.
Stay Tuned Loser
Posted on 11/12/19 at 9:42 pm to Speckhunter2012
quote:
Fail. It is going to be Glorious this next year.
Do you ever actually respond to a post, or do you always just post this gibberish?
Posted on 11/12/19 at 9:47 pm to boomtown143
quote:
I am sure you will find it tantalizing!
This is amazing
Posted on 11/12/19 at 9:52 pm to Bwmdx
quote:
What be funny is when this call shows that it was the Ukrainian President was the one to bring up corruption with American officials and how they were unable to get evidence of this to the DOJ because of Obama leftovers.
The internet in Ukraine must have been down.
And the phone lines must have been out, too.
Posted on 11/12/19 at 10:09 pm to MizzouBS
quote:
Being transparent would be to release the entire recording. He will not release the recording.
Name another president that has released a transcript of their call with a foreign leader when the subject of their conversation was called into question. Has Quid Pro Joe volunteered to release transcripts of his calls with Ukraine to prove he wasn’t extorting them?? If not, why not? What about Barry- the self proclaimed “most transparent president in history”?? Where are the call transcripts with Iran leaders when he negotiated that totally “above board” Nuclear Deal requiring pallets of cash being sent in secret??
Posted on 11/12/19 at 10:11 pm to udtiger
quote:
Here are some facts for you Tex:
So, whatever the Washington Examiner says are facts??
Give me a break.
How come they didn't even mention the fact that Vindman said the transcript also left out Trump's mention of the Biden video??
And tell me, in the call, which Ukrainian prosecutor was Trump referring to?
Popular
Back to top


0








