- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Govt Tide
| Favorite team: | |
| Location: | |
| Biography: | |
| Interests: | |
| Occupation: | |
| Number of Posts: | 9520 |
| Registered on: | 11/4/2009 |
| Online Status: | Not Online |
Recent Posts
Message
DJ with a good OC could probably do some damage (in a good way) at Auburn
0
re: Door Dash girl is a perfect example of female privilege and lack of accountability
Posted by Govt Tide on 10/28/25 at 10:57 am to tigerdup07
quote:.
should have locked his door before passing out naked
Ideally, sure. That would have guaranteed the possibility of an incident. Then again, would that also apply if the genders were reversed? Doubtful. A male door dasher would be in jail under the same circumstances and facing both criminal charges and a serious lawsuit he'd have to pay a significant portion either out of pocket or through liability insurance coverage if he has it. The consequences would be quick and severe with little to none of the victim blaming the customer is being subjected to.
On the other hand, this woman will likely face little or no criminal charges and most likely won't face any real civil penalties either which will only further emboldened vindictive feminists to weaponize this kind of crap on other men
I actually delivered Door Dash once to earn a little extra gas money. The crazy thing is that I would be scared as a guy to even take the required picture of the food in front of an open door to confirm delivery with a naked woman passed out nearby on the couch. A guy could potentially get in trouble for doing that even if she was nowhere in the picture yet a woman can apparently come right up to the threshold, pull out her phone, zoom in on a naked unconscious guy, film it, post it online, doxx the guy putting his first name, last initial, and address online, and then accuse him of SA and somehow have several people defend her as a victim. The double standard is insane!
quote:
I handled a case many years ago in which my client was arrested for masturbating in his living room. Woman and her daughter were walking by, saw him through the window, and called law enforcement
Yeh, that's stupid, perverted, and disturbing on the part of the guy doing that but still not sure that's worthy of having the police called and being arrested unless the guy is facing the window while doing it. Totally different ballgame then.
Not necessarily arguing the illegality of the circumstances of the case you're describing but why is the first reaction of a woman on the street to call the police on someone doing that well within their own home? It'd be one thing if the passerby witnessed something that would be illegal whether anyone saw it or not but that? I realize it's a lot different but the way things are going eventually a guy is going to have the police called on him for sexual harrassment or public indecency for reaching into his boxers to scratch his balls while standing in his living room with the window shades open
A lot of people are saying she allegedly reposted an edited version of her original online video showing the door wide open after allegedly taking down the original video where the door was slightly cracked and she opened it so the whole "he left the door wide open".
The customer is laying low and being quiet while door dash girl keeps digging a hole posting more videos about the incident which brings up another point about the lack of accountability.
The customer is wisely being tight lipped knowing he has a very good case for a lawsuit. Meanwhile the delivery girl keeps on posting videos which in a normal world would be the absolute worst thing someone in her position should be doing but because she's a woman and he's part of the one and only "oppressor" demographic she'll get off with at worst a slap on the wrist and won't have to pay a penny while Door Dash will end up having to clean up her mess and settle out of court with the customer.
Meanwhile the victim won't receive an apology from her despite having his reputation ruined and will somehow at best be considered a pervert and creep and at worst be considered someone who got away with SA all for the crime of passing out half naked in his own home
The customer is laying low and being quiet while door dash girl keeps digging a hole posting more videos about the incident which brings up another point about the lack of accountability.
The customer is wisely being tight lipped knowing he has a very good case for a lawsuit. Meanwhile the delivery girl keeps on posting videos which in a normal world would be the absolute worst thing someone in her position should be doing but because she's a woman and he's part of the one and only "oppressor" demographic she'll get off with at worst a slap on the wrist and won't have to pay a penny while Door Dash will end up having to clean up her mess and settle out of court with the customer.
Meanwhile the victim won't receive an apology from her despite having his reputation ruined and will somehow at best be considered a pervert and creep and at worst be considered someone who got away with SA all for the crime of passing out half naked in his own home
I added a link to the video in the OP for all the OT smartasses
Door Dash girl is a perfect example of female privilege and lack of accountability
Posted by Govt Tide on 10/28/25 at 7:27 am
Customer gets home (likely wasted) after a night out, orders Door Dash with instructions to leave order at the door, and then passes out half naked on his couch.
Door Dash delivery woman proceeds to deliver order and instead of placing the order at the door and taking a picture of order to confirm it was delivered as instructed she whips out her phone and films the guy naked on HIS couch inside HIS home. Then proceeds to post the video online and then doxxes the customer posting his first name last initial and his address. Man wakes up to video of himself all over the internet and naturally feels violated and is pissed.
Door Dash girl probably sensing that she may have f'd quadruples down and actually accuses the customer of committing SA against her. Imagine the level of hubris and entitlement it takes to go to someone's house with explicit instructions to leave the order at the door and feeling entitled to insist you're a victim after doing things that would land a male Door Dasher in jail within 24 hours of the incident.
Meanwhile there are countless videos online defending and/or excusing her behavior and people calling the guy a pervert and a creep for passing out naked inside his own home
Dude gets filmed online without his knowledge or consent while passed out naked inside his own home on his own couch, is humiliated online after having the video posted online, then gets doxxed, and then to top it off is accused of SA by the perpetrator. Meanwhile, the videos go viral and women and beta males are everywhere online excusing her behavior, telling her SHE'S the victim, and dragging the customer thru the mud calling him a creep and pervert for the crime of passing out drunk on his own couch.
Door Dash customer likely won't get a dime in any lawsuit from the Door Dash girl nor an apology. She probably won't even get a misdemeanor charge while this dude gets humiliated and has his reputation ruined.
I realize the whole women vs accountability has become a popular joke but it gets old seeing women constantly getting away with s### while seeing men getting buried fkr every little thing they do wrong.
Sick and tired of the hypocrisy and double standards
LINK
Door Dash delivery woman proceeds to deliver order and instead of placing the order at the door and taking a picture of order to confirm it was delivered as instructed she whips out her phone and films the guy naked on HIS couch inside HIS home. Then proceeds to post the video online and then doxxes the customer posting his first name last initial and his address. Man wakes up to video of himself all over the internet and naturally feels violated and is pissed.
Door Dash girl probably sensing that she may have f'd quadruples down and actually accuses the customer of committing SA against her. Imagine the level of hubris and entitlement it takes to go to someone's house with explicit instructions to leave the order at the door and feeling entitled to insist you're a victim after doing things that would land a male Door Dasher in jail within 24 hours of the incident.
Meanwhile there are countless videos online defending and/or excusing her behavior and people calling the guy a pervert and a creep for passing out naked inside his own home
Dude gets filmed online without his knowledge or consent while passed out naked inside his own home on his own couch, is humiliated online after having the video posted online, then gets doxxed, and then to top it off is accused of SA by the perpetrator. Meanwhile, the videos go viral and women and beta males are everywhere online excusing her behavior, telling her SHE'S the victim, and dragging the customer thru the mud calling him a creep and pervert for the crime of passing out drunk on his own couch.
Door Dash customer likely won't get a dime in any lawsuit from the Door Dash girl nor an apology. She probably won't even get a misdemeanor charge while this dude gets humiliated and has his reputation ruined.
I realize the whole women vs accountability has become a popular joke but it gets old seeing women constantly getting away with s### while seeing men getting buried fkr every little thing they do wrong.
Sick and tired of the hypocrisy and double standards
LINK
Politicians can be included too btw. Here's the Democratic house representative from Tennessee who put a bucket of chicken in the seat of a witness that didn't show up yo testify for an oversight committee hearing. What a jackass
Vanderbilt:
Steve Cohen (D) - Tennessee
Vanderbilt:
Steve Cohen (D) - Tennessee
SEC alum TDS bracket challenge (public figure edition)
Posted by Govt Tide on 10/24/25 at 3:09 pm
The thread below about Carville below got me wondering how many prominent alums or at least alums who are public figures with TDS do SEC schools as a whole have. Who would win such a bracket?
There may only be enough to do a Sweet 16 but I can think of 1 LSU and at least 2 Bama alums who would likely coast to a berth in the Sweet 16.
Feel free to add any alums from your SEC school. I'll get it started by adding a couple of Bama alums...
Joe Scarborough
Kaitlan Collins
There may only be enough to do a Sweet 16 but I can think of 1 LSU and at least 2 Bama alums who would likely coast to a berth in the Sweet 16.
Feel free to add any alums from your SEC school. I'll get it started by adding a couple of Bama alums...
Joe Scarborough
Kaitlan Collins
re: If Bama wins this weekend, it will be an upset
Posted by Govt Tide on 10/3/25 at 8:51 am to theballguy
All kidding aside, Alabama's injuries on defense especially on the D line and Russaw are a big problem. We've been below to much average defensively against the run so far this season. We're strong against the pass though.
Vandy has a capable if not good defense but they are completely legit on offense. They are more than capable of absolutely dominating the time of possession while consistently scoring against our defense. They key for Alabama is holding them to field goals instead of TDs and jumping to an early lead.
Vandy has a capable if not good defense but they are completely legit on offense. They are more than capable of absolutely dominating the time of possession while consistently scoring against our defense. They key for Alabama is holding them to field goals instead of TDs and jumping to an early lead.
"Who was the disgraced Republican who lost an election a few years back and still only lost inside the MOE?
Talking about Roy Moore?"
Say what you will about Alabama and the recent cast of non-politicians sports figures contemplating a run for U.S. Senate but even deep red Alabama has limits on how piss poor a Republican candidate can be. Roy Moore is proof of that.
I didn't think Tuberville was going to be as big a goofball as he was but at least he was reliably MAGA with his important votes which is all he had to be to be an effective U.S. Senator. I don't want him anywhere near the governor's mansion however.
Really wish Tommy Battle (mayor of Huntsville) would run for governor. He'd be a good one
Talking about Roy Moore?"
Say what you will about Alabama and the recent cast of non-politicians sports figures contemplating a run for U.S. Senate but even deep red Alabama has limits on how piss poor a Republican candidate can be. Roy Moore is proof of that.
I didn't think Tuberville was going to be as big a goofball as he was but at least he was reliably MAGA with his important votes which is all he had to be to be an effective U.S. Senator. I don't want him anywhere near the governor's mansion however.
Really wish Tommy Battle (mayor of Huntsville) would run for governor. He'd be a good one
quote:
LSU fans repeating the old Saban playbook. "He'll leave guys, trust us"
LSU fans (circa 2008-2010)..."Miss Terry hates it in Tuscaloosa. She and Nick are tired of dealing with the Bammers and would crawl back to Baton Rouge on their hands and knees if the LSU job opens again. They want out of Tuscaloosa" ??
It's a neck and neck race between Auburn and LSU on who can waste a great defense the most this season
re: Bruce Pearl
Posted by Govt Tide on 9/22/25 at 4:03 pm to Tideroller
Pearl was the best coach in the SEC, top 5 coach nationally. Now it's the UF coach, then Nate (G)Oates, or maybe Barnes at UT
quote:
I don't think bama fans are sad if LSU stays a permanent game.
I agree. In fact, most Alabama fans expect our permanents to be Auburn, Tennessee, and LSU.
It'll arguably be the 3 toughest permanent opponents any other SEC team faces but considering Alabama owns Tiger Stadium (30-10-2 all time record in Tiger Stadium) it'll be like having an extra home game every other year
re: Looking into these new national title claims by Auburn and three of them may be the worst
Posted by Govt Tide on 8/24/25 at 12:22 pm to BigScoreboard
quote:
Alabama and Auburn should should go thru the list of years neither has claimed. They can just flip a coin to decide which one gets to claim that season.
Alabama should drop its 1941 claim and add claims for 1945, 1966, and 1977 just for s###s and giggles...lol
re: A Different List of Permanent Opponents: Geography, Rivalries, and Balance
Posted by Govt Tide on 8/24/25 at 11:51 am to Pvt Hudson
quote:
A&M feels more like Texas, LSU, Arkansas
Agreed. The LSU/Florida game is more of a recent series due to permanent opponents being added after A&M and Missouri joined the league rather than a traditional rivalry.
I'd switch out LSU vs Florida and replace it with A&M for LSU and Tennessee for Florida...
LSU: OM, A&M, Arkansas
Florida: UGA, Tennessee, South Carolina
Tennessee: Bama, Florida, Vandy
A&M: Texas, LSU, Missouri
Arkansas: Texas, LSU, Missouri
Texas: OU, A&M, Arkansas
Other than those changes, the rest of the OP's list of permanent opponents looks reasonable
re: Looking into these new national title claims by Auburn and three of them may be the worst
Posted by Govt Tide on 8/24/25 at 11:27 am to koreandawg
As for the OP, you make a good argument especially 1958. It's awfully ballsy to go 9-0-1 (Auburn) and claim a national title in a season a fellow league member (LSU) went 11-0 and was overwhelmingly awarded the national championship by 16 of the 17 pollsters at the time. Even worse, the lone pollster (FWAA) who somehow didn't name LSU their nat'l champion that year awarded it to Iowa who went 8-1-1 that season.
As embarrassing as Alabama's 1941 claim is, they were at least named nat'l champs by at least 1 pollster unlike 1958 Auburn. Officially claiming a title in a season that ZERO pollsters named you national champion has to be unprecedented.
As embarrassing as Alabama's 1941 claim is, they were at least named nat'l champs by at least 1 pollster unlike 1958 Auburn. Officially claiming a title in a season that ZERO pollsters named you national champion has to be unprecedented.
re: Looking into these new national title claims by Auburn and three of them may be the worst
Posted by Govt Tide on 8/24/25 at 11:04 am to koreandawg
I don't necessarily blame Auburn fans for claiming national titles where at least one poll selected them as such but they've forever forfeited any high ground to scrutinize any of Alabama's national title claims other than the 1941 claim which is Alabama's only truly absurd title claim.
For all the ridicule Auburn fans (and a few other rival fanbases and commentators) have given Alabama fans for many of our national title claims, every non-AP title Alabama claims (other than 1941) had as many or more polls naming Alabama the national champions than all the new championship claims Auburn added.
If Alabama counted title claims the same way Auburn just did they could claim even more titles than the school officially claims now.
For example, here are new national title seasons that Alabama doesn't currently claim that they could using the same critieria Auburn is now using to claim 1910 and 1913 as national title claims...
1945 - Alabama went 10-0 including a blowout win in the Rose Bowl - awarded nat't title by NCF. Army went 9-0 and was the overwhelming pick as nat'l champions (and rightfully so)
1962 - Alabama went 10-1 and was named nat'l champs by BR (same lone pollster that named Auburn in 1910 and 1913). Ole Miss went 10-0 that season and was named nat'l champ by 3 pollsters. USC went 11-0 and was the overwhelming pick that year.
1966 - The infamous "missing ring" season. Alabama went 11-0 after winning back to back AP titles in '64 and '65 and was named nat'l champs by pollsters but finished 3rd in the major polls behind Notre
Dame and Michigan State who played to a tie finishing 9-0-1 respectively.
1975 Alabama - finished 11-1 and named nat'l champions by 1 pollster (MGR). Oklahoma who went 11-1 was rightfully named nat'l champion by AP, UPI, and a majority of the pollsters
1977 Alabama - Alabama's season (and legtimate argument to be named nat'l champion that season) was very similar to Auburn's 1983 nat'l title worthy season. 1983 Auburn went undefeated against a strong schedule after losing its season opener at home against a strong Texas team. Alabama opened the 1977 season with a close loss @ Nebraska before running the table. Alabama soundly defeated the same Ole Miss team that went on to upset Notre Dame a few weeks later. #2 lost their bowl game while #3 Alabama blew out Ohio State in the Sugar Bowl. Yet #5 Notre Dame who beat #1 Texas in their bowl game leapfrogged #3 Alabama for the national title much the same was Miami leapfrogged Auburn after beating #1 Nebraska in the Orange Bowl in 1983. 1977 Alabama was arguably screwed even worse than 1983 Auburn due to soundly defeating a common opponent that Notre Dame lost to.
Those are just the examples from the 1960s and 1970s and don't even get into the 1925, 1926, 1930, and 1934 nat'l title claims that Auburn fans give Alabama fans crap for claiming despite Alabama going 10-0 in 3 of those seasons (and 9-0-1 in 1926).
1925 Alabama - went 10-0 including an upset win in the Rose Bowl and named nat'l champions by 9 pollsters compared to Dartmouth being named by 2 pollsters at season's end
1926 Alabama - Went 9-0-1 and tied 10-0-1 Stanford in the Rose Bowl. Alabama was named nat'l champs by 6 pollsters while Stanford was named nat'l champs by 4 pollsters
1930 Alabama - went 10-0 including a Rose Bowl win and was named nat'l champs by 4 pollsters. Notre Dame who is widely considered to have the strongest nat'l championship claim that season also went 10-0 and was named nat'l champs by 9 pollsters that season.
1934 Alabama - went 10-0 and again won the Rose Bowl and was named nat'l champs by 6 of the pollsters. Minnesota who is generally considered THE national champion that season went 8-0 and was named nat'l champion by 8 of the pollsters
Long story short, Alabama (the school) claims 4 pre-AP nat'l titles for 1925, 1926, 1930, and 1934. but doesn't claim a 1945 season in which Alabama went 10-0 with a blowout win the Rose Bowl.
Alabama doesn't claim 1962 and 1975 either...seasons they were awarded a national title by at least 1 pollster but seasons where another team or teams were much more deserving
Finally, Alabama doesn't claim either 1966 or 1977...two seasons they have at least as strong a national title claim as 1983 Auburn does
For all the ridicule Auburn fans (and a few other rival fanbases and commentators) have given Alabama fans for many of our national title claims, every non-AP title Alabama claims (other than 1941) had as many or more polls naming Alabama the national champions than all the new championship claims Auburn added.
If Alabama counted title claims the same way Auburn just did they could claim even more titles than the school officially claims now.
For example, here are new national title seasons that Alabama doesn't currently claim that they could using the same critieria Auburn is now using to claim 1910 and 1913 as national title claims...
1945 - Alabama went 10-0 including a blowout win in the Rose Bowl - awarded nat't title by NCF. Army went 9-0 and was the overwhelming pick as nat'l champions (and rightfully so)
1962 - Alabama went 10-1 and was named nat'l champs by BR (same lone pollster that named Auburn in 1910 and 1913). Ole Miss went 10-0 that season and was named nat'l champ by 3 pollsters. USC went 11-0 and was the overwhelming pick that year.
1966 - The infamous "missing ring" season. Alabama went 11-0 after winning back to back AP titles in '64 and '65 and was named nat'l champs by pollsters but finished 3rd in the major polls behind Notre
Dame and Michigan State who played to a tie finishing 9-0-1 respectively.
1975 Alabama - finished 11-1 and named nat'l champions by 1 pollster (MGR). Oklahoma who went 11-1 was rightfully named nat'l champion by AP, UPI, and a majority of the pollsters
1977 Alabama - Alabama's season (and legtimate argument to be named nat'l champion that season) was very similar to Auburn's 1983 nat'l title worthy season. 1983 Auburn went undefeated against a strong schedule after losing its season opener at home against a strong Texas team. Alabama opened the 1977 season with a close loss @ Nebraska before running the table. Alabama soundly defeated the same Ole Miss team that went on to upset Notre Dame a few weeks later. #2 lost their bowl game while #3 Alabama blew out Ohio State in the Sugar Bowl. Yet #5 Notre Dame who beat #1 Texas in their bowl game leapfrogged #3 Alabama for the national title much the same was Miami leapfrogged Auburn after beating #1 Nebraska in the Orange Bowl in 1983. 1977 Alabama was arguably screwed even worse than 1983 Auburn due to soundly defeating a common opponent that Notre Dame lost to.
Those are just the examples from the 1960s and 1970s and don't even get into the 1925, 1926, 1930, and 1934 nat'l title claims that Auburn fans give Alabama fans crap for claiming despite Alabama going 10-0 in 3 of those seasons (and 9-0-1 in 1926).
1925 Alabama - went 10-0 including an upset win in the Rose Bowl and named nat'l champions by 9 pollsters compared to Dartmouth being named by 2 pollsters at season's end
1926 Alabama - Went 9-0-1 and tied 10-0-1 Stanford in the Rose Bowl. Alabama was named nat'l champs by 6 pollsters while Stanford was named nat'l champs by 4 pollsters
1930 Alabama - went 10-0 including a Rose Bowl win and was named nat'l champs by 4 pollsters. Notre Dame who is widely considered to have the strongest nat'l championship claim that season also went 10-0 and was named nat'l champs by 9 pollsters that season.
1934 Alabama - went 10-0 and again won the Rose Bowl and was named nat'l champs by 6 of the pollsters. Minnesota who is generally considered THE national champion that season went 8-0 and was named nat'l champion by 8 of the pollsters
Long story short, Alabama (the school) claims 4 pre-AP nat'l titles for 1925, 1926, 1930, and 1934. but doesn't claim a 1945 season in which Alabama went 10-0 with a blowout win the Rose Bowl.
Alabama doesn't claim 1962 and 1975 either...seasons they were awarded a national title by at least 1 pollster but seasons where another team or teams were much more deserving
Finally, Alabama doesn't claim either 1966 or 1977...two seasons they have at least as strong a national title claim as 1983 Auburn does
re: Fairhope, AL
Posted by Govt Tide on 8/23/25 at 1:42 pm to Earthquake 88
Also surprised no one mentioned Tamara's which pound for pound is probably my favorite restaurant in Fairhope. Excellent brunch, solid dinner menu, and far and away the best happy hour with their combo of appetizer/drink specials you'll find anywhere
Popular
85
