- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Boston Celtics Joe Mazzulla with an epic response to question about "Royal family" at game
Posted on 12/27/22 at 8:33 am to AggieHank86
Posted on 12/27/22 at 8:33 am to AggieHank86
quote:
In my world, it is entirely possible to be respectful without being deferential.
The brit royal family has done nothing to earn the respect of Americans.
1
Posted on 12/27/22 at 8:36 am to AggieHank86
quote:
Link?
You once said "the board will ignore this information unless it is sourced from a Stormfront article".....
I didn't even know what the fk Stormfront WAS until YOU brought that filth to the board.
BTW, you still say Goebbels isn't famous because he's a Nazi...?
Posted on 12/27/22 at 8:37 am to BBONDS25
quote:
K. And you are ignorant about procedure.
Look bud, you claim to be a lawyer. I understand why it's a hit to fall on your face like that.
Maybe it's just tax law that you know well. Let me know when you want to test that out.
Posted on 12/27/22 at 8:39 am to TbirdSpur2010
quote:you were in the military. Did you salute the man or the rank?
The brit royal family has done nothing to earn the respect of Americans.
Like them or not, they were in the United States as representatives of the government of an important ally.
Posted on 12/27/22 at 8:40 am to AggieHank86
quote:
Of course, I also don't understand why a prominent American would be intentionally disrespectful about the representative of one of his country's oldest and most-important allies, either.
They don’t “represent” the UK in any meaningful way. We are not their subjects and haven’t been since we beat their asses in the 1770s.
It wasn’t the PM in attendance it was the disgraced, down-graded spawn.
Posted on 12/27/22 at 8:44 am to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
Maybe it's just tax law that you know well. Let me know when you want to test that out.
now is good for me. 
Posted on 12/27/22 at 8:45 am to BBONDS25
quote:
now is good for me.
Oh. Thought you had a busy morning.
Well, post something you think I'd disagree with and we can go from there.
Posted on 12/27/22 at 8:46 am to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
Oh. Thought you had a busy morning. Well, post something you think I'd disagree with and we can go from there.
that’s what I thought. Posted on 12/27/22 at 8:47 am to BBONDS25
quote:
that’s what I thought.
So now isn't good?
Posted on 12/27/22 at 8:49 am to AggieHank86
quote:
you were in the military. Did you salute the man or the rank?
This makes no sense. Brit royals aren't in an American servicemember's chain of command.
quote:
Like them or not, they were in the United States as representatives of the government of an important ally.
Which means jack shite as far as American citizens owing them ANYthing, respect or otherwise. They're overglorified figureheads. They don't deserve any American's respect just for showing up someplace. They can go back where they came from.
This post was edited on 12/27/22 at 8:51 am
Posted on 12/27/22 at 8:50 am to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
So now isn't good?
idiot. How the frick am I supposed to guess what you would disagree with? You get confused over who can make rules prospective vs retroactive (legislature or judiciary) because, as I reminded you several times, you are ignorant about procedure. Now you are challenging me to “post some tax issue I will disagree with”. Do you read what you write? You keep proving the pigeon/chess board analogy to be quite apt.
All because you wanted to white knight for hank. Your autism is flaring up.
This post was edited on 12/27/22 at 8:51 am
Posted on 12/27/22 at 8:56 am to BBONDS25
quote:
How the frick am I supposed to guess what you would disagree with?
Well, you've decided to run your mouth about it more than once. Maybe you're just talking out of your arse, as usual.
quote:
You get confused over who can make rules prospective vs retroactive (legislature or judiciary) because, as I reminded you several times, you are ignorant about procedure.
You made a bullshite claim. I stomped your arse into the ground. Get over it.
Posted on 12/27/22 at 9:16 am to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
You made a bullshite claim. I stomped your arse into the ground. Get over it.
keep shitting on that board, pigeon. This post was edited on 12/27/22 at 9:16 am
Posted on 12/27/22 at 9:33 am to TbirdSpur2010
quote:
They're overglorified figureheads.
In current day, they are Disney figures if we are to be honest.
Keeping the Royal Family around is "good for business" if you are England.
If you were to eliminate everything to do with "The Royals" from England, you would be left with a miserable bog with bad food and people with poor Dental hygiene running around.
Many sheep are all too eager to bow to the pomp and pageantry of a group of people who have outlived their usefulness because some are easily blinded by baubles and bangles.
Posted on 12/27/22 at 9:43 am to AggieHank86
U always a prick? Damm
Posted on 12/27/22 at 9:44 am to BBONDS25
I've reduced you to lobbing insults, memes, and emoji duplication.
All because I'm a better lawyer than you.
All because I'm a better lawyer than you.
Posted on 12/27/22 at 9:45 am to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
I stomped your arse into the ground.
The WWE mentality.
Posted on 12/27/22 at 9:47 am to AggieHank86
quote:
I also don't understand why a prominent American would be intentionally disrespectful
What you find disrespectful is very amusing.
Posted on 12/27/22 at 9:48 am to Cut me Mick
WVU and Huggins product.
Posted on 12/27/22 at 9:50 am to oogabooga68
quote:
In current day, they are Disney figures if we are to be honest.
Keeping the Royal Family around is "good for business" if you are England.
This. They're portable tourist attractions.
quote:
all too eager to bow to the pomp and pageantry
Like you said, Disney shite. People (romantically) love the idea of kings/queens/princesses/etc.
Page 6 of 9
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News