- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Boston Celtics Joe Mazzulla with an epic response to question about "Royal family" at game
Posted on 12/27/22 at 8:15 am to DisplacedBuckeye
Posted on 12/27/22 at 8:15 am to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
Already backpedaling.
Calm down, Sally. I’ll find it. Only a moron would think I am backpedaling. I’m doubling down. You will have to wait a few hours to white knight for your boy, though. I’ve got a bit of work and can’t comb through hanks posts at the moment. I have a break late am, though.
This post was edited on 12/27/22 at 8:16 am
1
Posted on 12/27/22 at 8:15 am to Bulldogblitz
quote:no kidding - an IQ above 80 is extreme rarity there
That was fantastic, he is a rare bird in the NBA
loved it
Posted on 12/27/22 at 8:16 am to BBONDS25
quote:
I’ll find it.
K.
Posted on 12/27/22 at 8:17 am to DisplacedBuckeye
Just in case you missed my ETA. I wanted you to see me calling you a moron. It made me chuckle this am.
quote:
Calm down, Sally. I’ll find it. Only a moron would think I am backpedaling. I’m doubling down. You will have to wait a few hours to white knight for your boy, though. I’ve got a bit of work and can’t comb through hanks posts at the moment. I have a break late am, though.
Posted on 12/27/22 at 8:17 am to BBONDS25
quote:Which (if said) is indeed quite different.
It was in some thread where Hank said something along the lines of “no surprise this board likes him. He is a white supremacist and a homohobe”. Something along this lines.
Did you weigh-in on the book-ban thread?
After a review, 98% of the books which had been banned were returned to the shelves, and I observed that those books obviously had not contained “pornography.“ The consensus of the resident brain trust (with Mickey being an exception) was that this was an admission by me that the remaining 2% had contained pornography. They simply could not grasp the concept that there are literally dozens of reasons (unrelated to porn) that the remaining 2% may not have been returned to the shelves.
I suspect that this will be a replay of that discussion.
This post was edited on 12/27/22 at 8:24 am
Posted on 12/27/22 at 8:17 am to AggieHank86
quote:
It was his response after being told that the Prince and Princess of Wales WERE there that seemed rather disrespectful.
Disrespectful? What respect are they owed?
Posted on 12/27/22 at 8:20 am to wareaglepete
quote:They are representatives of the British government, our most-important global ally.
Disrespectful? What respect are they owed?
So, “At least a modicum.”
Posted on 12/27/22 at 8:22 am to AggieHank86
quote:
Which (if said) is indeed quite different
no it isn’t. Posted on 12/27/22 at 8:22 am to BBONDS25
quote:
I wanted you to see me calling you a moron.
This means less than it ever did after your most recent frickup.
Posted on 12/27/22 at 8:23 am to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
This means less than it ever did after your most recent frickup.
Like playing chess with a pigeon.
Posted on 12/27/22 at 8:24 am to BBONDS25
I mean, you're a "lawyer" who got beat down in a legal argument by a hobbyist. I didn't even have to work at mucking up the board with you.
Posted on 12/27/22 at 8:28 am to DisplacedBuckeye
Posted on 12/27/22 at 8:28 am to AggieHank86
quote:
I also don't understand why a prominent American would be intentionally disrespectful about the representative of one of his country's oldest and most-important allies, either.
Here's why:
frick 'em, that's why.
My baseline attitude towards them is aggressive nonchalance. Deteriorates from there. I don't even respect AMERICAN federal politicians. Be damned if people act like I owe foreign monarchs any degree of deference.
Posted on 12/27/22 at 8:29 am to AggieHank86
quote:
his response after being told that the Prince and Princess of Wales WERE there that seemed rather disrespectful. Basically, "Oh, them. Yeah, I don't care."
The appropriate response.
Posted on 12/27/22 at 8:29 am to BBONDS25
You don't even know what prospective means.
I have a feeling you're going to be similarly embarrassed here.
Just here for the show.
I have a feeling you're going to be similarly embarrassed here.
Just here for the show.
Posted on 12/27/22 at 8:30 am to AggieHank86
You and those two twits can "respectfully" go frick yourselves.
Posted on 12/27/22 at 8:31 am to TbirdSpur2010
Who said anything about “the deference?“
In my world, it is entirely possible to be respectful without being deferential.
In my world, it is entirely possible to be respectful without being deferential.
Posted on 12/27/22 at 8:31 am to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
You don't even know what prospective means.
K. And you are ignorant about procedure. Which is why you claiming victory is amazing. Not surprising. Your position in the spectrum does not allow for you to think you have EVER lost a debate.
Playing chess with a pigeon. Enjoy your am. Be back on a few.
Posted on 12/27/22 at 8:32 am to AggieHank86
quote:
They are representatives of the British government
Yawn.
Posted on 12/27/22 at 8:33 am to AggieHank86
You can "research" all of that bullshite but can't figure out dR jilL ain't a phD?
Page 5 of 9
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News