- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 2/12/26 at 11:27 am to GumboPot
I fully support the questioning on redactions and removal of many of them if legally permissible (not sure what the considerations are there).
But pretty interesting that two of the most overtly sexualized (by their own doing) members of Congress are the ones purportedly outraged and trying to be in the new over this saga.
But pretty interesting that two of the most overtly sexualized (by their own doing) members of Congress are the ones purportedly outraged and trying to be in the new over this saga.
Posted on 2/12/26 at 11:29 am to Turnblad85
quote:
is this the same Boebert that while going through a divorce, left a toddler to go
****
Posted on 2/12/26 at 11:30 am to Pettifogger
quote:
Lauren and others have spent years crafting the most extreme and sordid tales
it's the complete opposite of "way darker than anyone imagined"
It's failing to meet the public's expectations PRECISELY BECAUSE the Q idiots and others set absurd wild expectations regarding satanic rituals and eating infants
Hence, Q (and others) helped create the environment whereby outrage is muted for "merely" grooming and exploiting 16 year olds.
This post is so frickin ridiculous it reads like a direct grab from 1984.
You have a sitting member of Congress who just viewed the files unredacted and she is telling you it's like what those "Q idiots" have been saying all along.
So along comes a retard who then twists that somehow into it all being the "Q idiots" faults? Motherfricker, you should link up with Baghdad Bob.
Posted on 2/12/26 at 11:32 am to AlterEd
Personally my hobbies aren't centered around inventing pedophilia tales and thrilling myself by talking about them on the internet - but you do you brother
Just know that you and your fellow hobbyists have dulled the public's concerns about what has actually transpired and what are elites actually are up to
Just know that you and your fellow hobbyists have dulled the public's concerns about what has actually transpired and what are elites actually are up to
Posted on 2/12/26 at 11:33 am to Pettifogger
quote:
It's failing to meet the public's expectations PRECISELY BECAUSE the Q idiots and others set absurd wild expectations regarding satanic rituals and eating infants
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. 
Posted on 2/12/26 at 11:34 am to Ailsa
Man I'm sold
*Alisa subsequently discovers that the claims attributed to Gibson were explicitly denied by Gibson and the original fake news publisher retracted them to avoid getting sued*
"Ah nevertheless!"
*Alisa subsequently discovers that the claims attributed to Gibson were explicitly denied by Gibson and the original fake news publisher retracted them to avoid getting sued*
"Ah nevertheless!"
This post was edited on 2/12/26 at 11:38 am
Posted on 2/12/26 at 11:43 am to AlterEd
quote:
I'll bet you that female musician he is talking about is Katie Perry.
Lady Gaga is deep in this stuff.
Posted on 2/12/26 at 11:45 am to Pettifogger
quote:
But pretty interesting that two of the most overtly sexualized (by their own doing) members of Congress are the ones purportedly outraged and trying to be in the new over this saga.
It's seems consistent. They are probably getting hit on all the time.
Posted on 2/12/26 at 11:49 am to Pettifogger
quote:
claims attributed to Gibson were explicitly denied by Gibson and the original fake news publisher retracted them to avoid getting sued
Show us where.
Posted on 2/12/26 at 11:51 am to Ailsa
quote:
A spokesperson for Gibson told Newsweek that the quotes attributed to the screen star are "completely false," adding that he "never said that or anything close to it."
Of course, you could just show him saying it, or an interview where he says it, or something like that
You know - "do your own research" before sharing dumb boomer graphics you found on the internet
This post was edited on 2/12/26 at 11:53 am
Posted on 2/12/26 at 11:52 am to Pettifogger
quote:
But pretty interesting that two of the most overtly sexualized (by their own doing) members of Congress are the ones purportedly outraged and trying to be in the new over this saga.
Not really since as you mentioned they do it by their own choice and have prospered from it. The ones they are standing up for didn’t do it by choice, gained nothing from it, and suffered greatly.
Posted on 2/12/26 at 11:53 am to DingLeeBerry
quote:
Not really since as you mentioned they do it by their own choice and have prospered from it. The ones they are standing up for didn’t do it by choice, gained nothing from it, and suffered greatly.
I don't think they're standing up for anyone but themselves, actually.
Posted on 2/12/26 at 11:54 am to Pettifogger
quote:
Just know that you and your fellow hobbyists have dulled the public's concerns about what has actually transpired and what are elites actually are up to
This is actually the intended effect behind it. Imagine if all of this had been dropped on the public suddenly without that buffer beforehand. Bondi says that fully prosecuting this stuff would topple the government. Well, it would do even worse than that if the public hadn't been prepared for it beforehand.
I'm sorry you cannot see this very simple concept. But "just know" that what you are advocating for here could have caused our entire society to collapse. That's how high the stakes are, man.
This post was edited on 2/12/26 at 11:55 am
Posted on 2/12/26 at 11:57 am to AlterEd
quote:
This is actually the intended effect behind it. Imagine if all of this had been dropped on the public suddenly without that buffer beforehand. Bondi says that fully prosecuting this stuff would topple the government. Well, it would do even worse than that if the public hadn't been prepared for it beforehand.
I'm sorry you cannot see this very simple concept. But "just know" that what you are advocating for here could have caused our entire society to collapse. That's how high the stakes are, man.
Ah I see
So Q is a government op, and you're all playing your roles to protect those in power from the real world consequences of their evil by desensitizing the public.
Makes complete sense. Kind of crappy thing for ya'll to do, though
Posted on 2/12/26 at 11:59 am to Pettifogger
quote:
So Q is a government op,
Yes, it is.
quote:
Makes complete sense
Yes, it does.
Posted on 2/12/26 at 12:08 pm to Pettifogger
quote:
Of course, you could just show him saying it, or an interview where he says it, or something like th
He said it on the Graham Norton show Nov 2017, look it up.
Here's another witness: timestamp 1:30
Posted on 2/12/26 at 12:13 pm to Ailsa
Hell, I think it was just yesterday that one of the producers of the film Pulp Fiction said this same sort of shite on Rogan's podcast.
MANY people have blown the whistle on this now.
MANY people have blown the whistle on this now.
Posted on 2/12/26 at 12:14 pm to Saint Alfonzo
quote:
Lady Gaga is deep in this stuff.
This post was edited on 2/12/26 at 12:15 pm
Posted on 2/12/26 at 12:15 pm to cardswinagain
quote:
Why aren’t people in handcuffs?
The 2 party system is too powerful and voters refuse to tear it down. America has been divided and conquered by a culture war created by the 2 parties working together to increase their power to this insurmountable level. Even if all tbe files are released people will line up to vote red or blue next election.
This post was edited on 2/12/26 at 12:18 pm
Page 10 of 11
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News