
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 10/30/26 at 6:52 pm to 3rdDOWN
quote:
3rdDOWN
Imagine having such a bad case of TDS that you would rather vote for Socialism/Communism. You are either a woman, or a very Beta Male.
Posted on 10/30/26 at 6:57 pm to mmcgrath
quote:
mmcgrath
you are such a pathetic pos, it isn't even funny. You openly are supporting Socialism/Communism. There are a few of you on here, You, SFP, Cubbies, Tarzana, that are some of the dumbest people society has to offer. You probably never worked an honest job in your life, just collecting checks.
Posted on 10/30/26 at 7:20 pm to Ailsa
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.quote:
How on EARTH is any of this possible?
Mark Elias hasn't even established standing in this case yet - which is somehow in front of Boasberg - and yet, Boasberg has STILL granted a motion, compelling the discovery of every single state asked to review suspected illegal ballots - by noon tomorrow - when this case is ENTIRELY based upon ALLEGED harms that have not yet occurred in NEVADA, argued tangentially on the basis of associational and organizational grounds, but are purely speculative at this point.
WHAT??? How often do judges grant a motion to a plaintiff who hasn't established that they even have standing to be a plaintiff yet?

Popular
Back to top

0








