- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 7/15/23 at 6:40 pm to foj1981
Posted on 7/15/23 at 6:47 pm to tiggerthetooth
The irony of him posting about this on Twitter and generating views
Posted on 7/15/23 at 6:49 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
Eloquent and compelling as always.
It's what you cementheads understand.
Are you denying the fact conservative voices were often censored on twitter prior to Musk?
Or are you attempting to play semantics with your equating freedom of speech to the first amendment? Meaning twitter is legally outside the requirements of the first amendment. Yes, it is. I didn't say first amendment though did I?
I'll guess door number two.
fricking balloonhead.
Posted on 7/15/23 at 6:50 pm to tiggerthetooth
cuban cries to zuckerdork on threads daily about banning meanies.
he's a super pussy
he's a super pussy
Posted on 7/15/23 at 6:54 pm to KAGTASTIC
quote:
Mind saying what company was it?
Bitwise Industries.
Super freaking woke. They’re under FBI investigation, the state is going after them as well as Fresno City. They’re fricked.
DDG search results
Posted on 7/15/23 at 6:54 pm to tiggerthetooth
Cuban's jealous AF because he never really has anything take off in the E universe
Posted on 7/15/23 at 6:56 pm to BuckyCheese
quote:
Are you denying the fact conservative voices were often censored on twitter prior to Musk?
Not at all. It was definitely happening. And the government was involved. Perhaps you should go read your initial post again. I think your poor communication skills have contributed to your confusion with my reply.
quote:
Or are you attempting to play semantics with your equating freedom of speech to the first amendment?
yikes. Keep digging. This post was edited on 7/15/23 at 6:57 pm
Posted on 7/15/23 at 6:57 pm to tiggerthetooth
The irony is Cuban posting this on his Twitter account.
Posted on 7/15/23 at 7:06 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
Or are you attempting to play semantics with your equating freedom of speech to the first amendment?
yikes. Keep digging.
Typical jjdoc/progfilth/cult45 tactic of snipping out one sentence to remove context.
Yikes indeed.
Posted on 7/15/23 at 7:11 pm to BuckyCheese
quote:
Typical jjdoc/progfilth/cult45 tactic of snipping out one sentence to remove context.
You are trying to separate the 1st amendment from the freedom of speech. That is such a ridiculous position to take.
You misspoke in your first post saying the woke companies that stopped advertising believed in Freedom of speech. Which is the exact opposite of the truth.
Now you want to play the semantic game to save face. Just say you fricked up. It’s no biggie. We all know you’re not the sharpest bulb.
Posted on 7/15/23 at 7:16 pm to Pookers
quote:He wants to be part of “the club” so badly but he doesn’t have the IQ or the net worth to join. He’s Russ Hanneman.
Cuban is a WEF fig and always has been. Not that Elon is much better.
Posted on 7/15/23 at 7:18 pm to Figgy
Polygon is another failing Mark Cuban backed company.
Posted on 7/15/23 at 7:20 pm to tiggerthetooth
The guy worth tens of billions attempting to taunt the guy worth hundreds of billions.
Musks net worth is higher than it's ever been at the moment, even with Twitter not being worth nearly what he paid.
Musks net worth is higher than it's ever been at the moment, even with Twitter not being worth nearly what he paid.
Posted on 7/15/23 at 7:24 pm to Rebel
quote:Yeah, of all the investors on Shark Tank, he's the last one I'd want to partner with.
Polygon is another failing Mark Cuban backed company.
Posted on 7/15/23 at 7:32 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
You misspoke in your first post saying the woke companies that stopped advertising believed in Freedom of speech. Which is the exact opposite of the truth.
No. While I could word it differently it's pretty clear to me that what that sentence says is "Dropped because Musk believes in free speech". We'll just ignore the fact it was a humorous "let me fix that for you" edit.
The fact of the matter is you likely knew exactly what I was saying with that edit, yet felt you had a way to attack someone that calls you and your ilk out daily for the disingenuous and downright ignorant things you say.
btw-The first amendment guarantees the government cannot curtail speech. Saying twitter allows freedom of speech is not the first amendment as twitter is a private enterprise. The first amendment does not apply to twitter just like it does not apply to TD.
Cementhead.
Posted on 7/15/23 at 8:25 pm to tiggerthetooth
Dude wants so bad to be relevant…
Posted on 7/15/23 at 8:34 pm to tiggerthetooth
They’re getting crushed with debt service fees.
Posted on 7/15/23 at 9:44 pm to tiggerthetooth
Cuban is a pussy bitch that lets Xi fck him in the a$$.
Posted on 7/15/23 at 10:04 pm to BuckyCheese
quote:
Was twitter ever profitable? I don't recall it ever being so.
With it without the government prop up money?
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News