- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Biden FBI secretly set up Trump to be indicted after he leaves office
Posted on 5/13/26 at 7:22 am
Posted on 5/13/26 at 7:22 am
LINK
quote:
In the final weeks of Joe Biden’s presidency, FBI agents tied to Justice Department special counsel Jack Smith’s investigation memorialized anew their belief that President Donald Trump broke the law in contesting the 2020 election and secretly arranged to preserve their evidence until 2030 in memos that raise alarm they could revive their prosecution after Trump leaves office.
The FBI memos and emails closing out the controversial Arctic Frost investigation – obtained by Just the News – show the bureau chose not to relinquish the evidence it gathered after Smith went to court to dismiss charges against Trump, even though that is the normal practice for agents. Instead, they created a preservation order keeping the evidence in FBI custody for two years after Trump's second term ends, claiming it was necessary to do so because of ongoing litigation, the memos show.
FBI emails and memos obtained by Just the News dating back to early 2025 show how the FBI agents and DOJ prosecutors who had been working on the criminal prosecutions aimed at Trump and his allies worked to close the 2020 election-related case against the incoming president, while also seemingly leaving open the door for the criminal case to be revived once Trump leaves office and a Democrat again holds the reins at the Justice Department.
quote:
One of the key “Case Closing” documents obtained by Just the News – originating from the FBI's Washington Field Office’s CR-15 team – was dated a couple of weeks into Trump’s second term, on February 5, 2025, when many holdover FBI agents and leaders were still in place.
The newly-released closing document from early 2025 repeated the extensive claims of criminality against Trump, which had been pursued by Smith and the bureau, and it sought to retain all of the evidence for a half decade until at least February 2030, when Trump would be a former president once more and thus when the DOJ guidance prohibiting the prosecution of a sitting president would no longer be in force.
The document was titled “Arctic Frost – Election Law Matters – Sensitive Investigative Matter” and its synopsis was “To Document the Closing of Captioned Investigation.” The listed enclosures buttressing the document were a “Deputy Special Counsel Concurrence” and the “Retention of Evidence Approval.”
Posted on 5/13/26 at 7:23 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
And….nothing will be done. Trump can sit in the cuck chair.
Posted on 5/13/26 at 7:24 am to BigPerm30
quote:
And….nothing will be done. Trump can sit in the cuck chair.
Going to be an ironic twist if his inaction leads to his own demise.
Posted on 5/13/26 at 7:28 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
Memo suggests?
Solomun is always wrong. He always makes these massive predictions then nothing ever happens
Solomun is always wrong. He always makes these massive predictions then nothing ever happens
Posted on 5/13/26 at 7:29 am to SDVTiger
I didn't want to be critical of Dutch for the thread, but I 100% knew before I clicked on the link it was going to be Solomon.
Posted on 5/13/26 at 7:30 am to Bunk Moreland
Has Solumon ever been right? I cant think of anything
Posted on 5/13/26 at 7:30 am to idlewatcher
quote:
Going to be an ironic twist if his inaction leads to his own demise.
Conservatives always get screwed by playing by rules that no one else cares about.
There's still a little over two years to fix this problem once and for all. A lot of people will throw their hands up and scream dictator, but who cares, They do that now mostly, and I'd rather it happen now than under the next socialist administration.
Posted on 5/13/26 at 7:35 am to SDVTiger
quote:
Has Solumon ever been right?
Years ago he had some good reporting (on Flynn I think) but has been coasting on his laurels since then, moving into more extreme/CT territory
I mean just look at this headline
quote:
Biden FBI secretly set up Trump to be indicted after he leaves office
That phrasing is for low-IQ types looking for sensationalism.
Nothing about this story is that shocking or bad. The DOJ prosecution against Trump was dismissed due to policy, not a legitimate legal belief in his innocence. It makes sense the evidence would be preserved to re-examine the case once that policy no longer applied. That's not a conspiracy. That's just logic.
Posted on 5/13/26 at 7:48 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
That's not a conspiracy. That's just leftist logic.
Posted on 5/13/26 at 7:50 am to BigPerm30
quote:
And….nothing will be done. Trump can sit in the cuck chair.
Before going scorched earth, you have to consolidate power.
A premature all out move will get him impeached and then convicted in the Senate.
There are enough cucked Republicans in the House and Senate just itching for an excuse to topple Trump.
The evidence has to be stacked like pancakes and shoved down everyone’s throat.
Some of the complicit Republicans need to be corralled and/or replaced before any major power move is engaged.
Imagine having to break bread with the very same people that set you up and who even planned multiple assassination attempts against you.
Posted on 5/13/26 at 7:51 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
This is fascism.
Posted on 5/13/26 at 8:00 am to Bourre
If James Comey or John Brenna get prosecuted now and win the Presidential election in 2028, will you call it "leftist logic" if the DOJ puts its prosecution against them on hold due to the same policy?
Posted on 5/13/26 at 8:10 am to BigPerm30
quote:
Bigperm30
quote:
cuck
Yep. That checks out
This post was edited on 5/13/26 at 8:10 am
Posted on 5/13/26 at 8:41 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
If James Comey or John Brenna get prosecuted now and win the Presidential election in 2028, will you call it "leftist logic" if the DOJ puts its prosecution against them on hold due to the same policy?
The difference is that the prosecution against Trump was solely politically motivated. The other guys you mentioned actually broke the law.
The entire premise of your argument is flawed when you don't feign ignorance about the circumstances of the cases.
Posted on 5/13/26 at 8:43 am to TenWheelsForJesus
quote:
he difference is that the prosecution against Trump was solely politically motivated.
There doesn't seem to be that difference in my example, not that it has any relevance to the discussion.
quote:
The entire premise of your argument is flawed when you don't feign ignorance about the circumstances of the cases.
This isn't logical, as it has no relevance to the policy being discussed.
However, your premise is flawed as it presumed that Trump didn't act illegally AND that these prosecutions aren't politically motivated. Just FYI.
Posted on 5/13/26 at 8:45 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
Given the massive amount of lawfare against Trump do you honestly think he is going to leave office without giving himself a Biden style Pardon for any federal crime committed from his date of birth until his last day in office?
Plus it would be really stupid to continue the lawfare after he is gone. All that does is keep his election base active and focused.
Plus it would be really stupid to continue the lawfare after he is gone. All that does is keep his election base active and focused.
Posted on 5/13/26 at 8:48 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
If James Comey or John Brenna get prosecuted now and win the Presidential election in 2028, will you call it "leftist logic" if the DOJ puts its prosecution against them on hold due to the same policy?
Yes. Considering they’ve broken the law and Trump actually didn’t.
You big dummy.
Posted on 5/13/26 at 8:52 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
Why has no one raided Christopher Wray and Garland at dawn?
Posted on 5/13/26 at 9:03 am to texag7
quote:
Yes. Considering they’ve broken the law and Trump actually didn’t.
Already covered. I'll copy/paste for you
quote:
This isn't logical, as it has no relevance to the policy being discussed.
However, your premise is flawed as it presumed that Trump didn't act illegally
Posted on 5/13/26 at 9:11 am to SlowFlowPro
The premise that my guy did nothing wrong and their guys did everything wrong cannot be flawed!
Popular
Back to top


5













