Started By
Message

re: Biden blowing up the pipeline would do more to fight "globalism" than anything Trump

Posted on 9/28/22 at 10:29 am to
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
477219 posts
Posted on 9/28/22 at 10:29 am to
quote:

That I don't care about either of them.

Then why are you participating in a discussion about them?

I don't care about the ecology of South Sudan. Don't see me posting on any message boards about that topic (and I post across a very wide spectrum of topics)

You came into this thread well into the discussion swinging a real big stick about a topic you don't care about.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
477219 posts
Posted on 9/28/22 at 10:30 am to
quote:

Still not addressing it.

Um

My posts outside of the hive mind get more downvotes

My posts within the hive mind get more upvotes
Posted by Decatur
Member since Mar 2007
32762 posts
Posted on 9/28/22 at 10:30 am to
When did you first start seeing people complain about the WEF? More recently I’m sure. Probably not too long after they came out with the “Great Reset.” Now if you look at what the WEF means by that it is rather innocuous. But when you look at how those making a big deal about it view it, it has taken on a completely new meaning. Substitute “white replacement” for the “Great Reset” and you’ll see where a lot of them are going with it.
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
89137 posts
Posted on 9/28/22 at 10:30 am to
quote:

Then why are you participating in a discussion about them?


I'm discussing you more than anything

quote:

You came into this thread well into the discussion swinging a real big stick about a topic you don't care about.



I'm not one for a post count boom, but seriously you might need to try having some self awareness.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
477219 posts
Posted on 9/28/22 at 10:30 am to
quote:

Driftwood LNG in your neck of the woods should be online this time next year. I believe the estimated exports are 2 bscfd.

I imagine their first shipment has already been bought
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
89137 posts
Posted on 9/28/22 at 10:31 am to
quote:

Um

My posts outside of the hive mind get more downvotes

My posts within the hive mind get more upvotes


And you equate that to support of Putin how?


Hint, you've still yet to address that.
Posted by squid_hunt
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2021
11272 posts
Posted on 9/28/22 at 10:31 am to
quote:

Increasing natty exports does not raise domestic prices???

Not what you said.
Posted by cwill
Member since Jan 2005
54755 posts
Posted on 9/28/22 at 10:31 am to
quote:

Using this logic, you think any time someone downvotes oweo, they must believe the opposite of whatever his post is?


I don’t know who that is, however, I would guess you’re taking the logical to the illogical by assuming people don’t differentiate. That works for your rationalizing. I guess.
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
89137 posts
Posted on 9/28/22 at 10:32 am to
quote:

I don’t know who that is


Shut the frick up
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
140573 posts
Posted on 9/28/22 at 10:33 am to
quote:

I imagine their first shipment has already been bought


They don't build it without commitments. Seriously this is how it works. In fact it is common for users of said natural gas to be investors also.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
477219 posts
Posted on 9/28/22 at 10:33 am to
quote:

When did you first start seeing people complain about the WEF?

Recently. It's just another boogeyman.

Like how the left labels every non-leftist group as some sort of racist or fascist group. Same behavior.

quote:

Probably not too long after they came out with the “Great Reset.” Now if you look at what the WEF means by that it is rather innocuous. But when you look at how those making a big deal about it view it, it has taken on a completely new meaning. Substitute “white replacement” for the “Great Reset” and you’ll see where a lot of them are going with it.

Again, that's a small minority with that thought process.

The much larger population sees it as a Leftist-authoritarian boogeyman without religious or ethnic association.

Those do exist, but I don't believe the WEF is really a big part of it. Academia, grade schools, the news, and the bureaucracy in DC are much better outlets for crypto-Communism. You get a lot more bang for your buck.

Those traditional outlets just aren't sexy enough for conspiracy theorists. CTs are like drugs. You always need a bigger dose. That's why new boogeymen are needed. Again, literally the same issues on the left with all the perceived racists, Nazis, etc.
This post was edited on 9/28/22 at 10:34 am
Posted by Powerman
Member since Jan 2004
173798 posts
Posted on 9/28/22 at 10:33 am to
quote:


And you equate that to support of Putin how?



Gumbo Pot might not "support Putin" but he is regurgitating Putin's justification for invasion as a legitimate justification.

You could at least argue that he's been duped by Russian state propaganda
Posted by cwill
Member since Jan 2005
54755 posts
Posted on 9/28/22 at 10:34 am to
quote:

quote:Increasing natty exports does not raise domestic prices??? Not what you said.


That is what I said. You’re proposing gov funds to increase lng capacity, which would result in more exports and higher domestic prices. Re-read.
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
89137 posts
Posted on 9/28/22 at 10:34 am to
quote:

Gumbo Pot might not "support Putin"


You could have stopped here.
quote:

You could at least argue that he's been duped by Russian state propaganda



Another that could use a heavy dose of self awareness.
This post was edited on 9/28/22 at 10:35 am
Posted by Powerman
Member since Jan 2004
173798 posts
Posted on 9/28/22 at 10:35 am to
quote:



Another that could use a heavy dose of self awareness.

Let me know when I start repeating the claims of a murderous dictator...
Posted by Bjorn Cyborg
Member since Sep 2016
35553 posts
Posted on 9/28/22 at 10:35 am to
quote:

illegal invasion


Illegal?

Based on what?
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
477219 posts
Posted on 9/28/22 at 10:36 am to
quote:

And you equate that to support of Putin how?

Support of Putin is part of the hive mind for many.

It's not shocking because a lot of his propaganda talking points are disseminated among the same population.

Watch for today's best example: "Biden already said he'd blow it up". Straight off the presses from Russian propaganda outlets, being posted on this board 12 hours later. It's not a coincidence.

Same thing why you have so many people trying to criticize the US for the invasion when we don't really have shite to do with it (now if this happened in 2014 or 2015? Sure. That's why nobody was really doing much to save Crimea from the same Russian bullshite).
Posted by theunknownknight
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2005
60938 posts
Posted on 9/28/22 at 10:36 am to
quote:

Illegal?

Based on what?




The Declaration of Independence
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
140573 posts
Posted on 9/28/22 at 10:36 am to
quote:

Gumbo Pot might not "support Putin" but he is regurgitating Putin's justification for invasion as a legitimate justification.



These are the reason I stated for Putin's advancement:

quote:

Reasons for Russian invasion of Ukraine:

1. Western mismanagement of post Soviet Russia. Specifically NATO expansion. The brazen eastward expansion of NATO has been declared a existential threat to Russia by Russian leaders for the past 2-3 decades.

2. Europe's hyper reliance on energy and commodities from Russia. Not necessarily a direct reason but a disposition between nations that allows for Russian advancement.

3. Expansionist desires of Putin. I'm under no illusion that Putin does not have expansionist desires. Your reason fall under Putin's expansionists desires.

4. Putin believes he his is a salvific force for Christendom versus Western woke-ism.


We do not get to 2., 3. and 4. without 1.


Are any of these unreasonable?
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
89137 posts
Posted on 9/28/22 at 10:36 am to
quote:

Let me know when I start repeating the claims of a murderous dictator...




Hillary would be a dictator if she had her way.

Nice of you to totally deflect when you realize you've been made a fool of though.
Jump to page
Page First 8 9 10 11 12 ... 23
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 10 of 23Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram