- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Biden admin just asked SCOTUS to remove “right to bear arms” from the Constitution
Posted on 9/28/21 at 10:31 am
Posted on 9/28/21 at 10:31 am
Biden admin asks scotus to remove 2A
Just what the title says. Biden admin using New York ruling to back door getting rid of our 2A rights. Firearm licenses to be awarded based on proof of need being much more than general population; ie rich and famous vs the rest of us.
Just what the title says. Biden admin using New York ruling to back door getting rid of our 2A rights. Firearm licenses to be awarded based on proof of need being much more than general population; ie rich and famous vs the rest of us.
27
Posted on 9/28/21 at 10:33 am to Placekicker
Imagine thinking some stupid shite like this would actually effectively work without problems
This post was edited on 9/28/21 at 12:48 pm
Posted on 9/28/21 at 10:33 am to Placekicker
you actually believe this article? or that this type of request has any chance given the way the court is stacked? dont waste your time with this bullshite
Posted on 9/28/21 at 10:34 am to Jrv2damac
If there’s no accountability, what does it hurt to ask?
Posted on 9/28/21 at 10:34 am to Placekicker
i need a video of it instead of an NRA article.
Posted on 9/28/21 at 10:39 am to Placekicker
Let me see if I understand correctly. You're saying the Supreme Court will be asked to determine if part of the Constitution is constitutional?
Posted on 9/28/21 at 10:40 am to hawkeye007
quote:
or that this type of request has any chance given the way the court is stacked? dont waste your time with this bullshite
If I've learned anything over the last decade, it's to never trust SCOTUS. It seems like every decision is a coin flip as to which way it will go.
Posted on 9/28/21 at 10:42 am to Placekicker
Said it long ago, they're definitely attacking your right to defend yourself.
All to glorify the criminal as a sign of a broken system.
All to glorify the criminal as a sign of a broken system.
Posted on 9/28/21 at 10:45 am to hawkeye007
quote:
hawkeye007
You voted for this so of course you are in denial
Congrats clown
Posted on 9/28/21 at 10:56 am to Placekicker
Good luck on that Biden. In order to repeal an amendment you have to meet a very specific set of requirements. Asking the Supreme Court to do it is not one of them.
Changing the words of an existing amendment would actually require another amendment to do so. The same goes for removing or repealing an existing amendment.
Then you would need the new amendment to be proposed by Two-Thirds of the House and the Senate, or a Convention of the States. If you get that far, you will still require three quarters of the States to ratify that amendment.
It was made to be difficult on purpose. The current admin just can't ask SCOTUS to change the wording of amendment, it is illegal to do so in that manner.
Changing the words of an existing amendment would actually require another amendment to do so. The same goes for removing or repealing an existing amendment.
Then you would need the new amendment to be proposed by Two-Thirds of the House and the Senate, or a Convention of the States. If you get that far, you will still require three quarters of the States to ratify that amendment.
It was made to be difficult on purpose. The current admin just can't ask SCOTUS to change the wording of amendment, it is illegal to do so in that manner.
This post was edited on 9/28/21 at 10:58 am
Posted on 9/28/21 at 10:59 am to BayouBengal51
quote:
The current admin just can't ask SCOTUS to change the wording of amendment, it is illegal to do so in that manner.
The current admin doesn't seem to let silly things like laws get in their way.
This post was edited on 9/28/21 at 11:00 am
Posted on 9/28/21 at 11:02 am to Placekicker
quote:2A is included in the Bill of Rights, not the Bill of Needs.
Firearm licenses to be awarded based on proof of need
Also, as long as the government has weapons, the citizens have a proveable need to own them as well.
Posted on 9/28/21 at 11:02 am to Placekicker
I am ready to fight.
Posted on 9/28/21 at 11:02 am to Placekicker
Biden, etc and the SCOTUS can do what they want - can't have mine though
Posted on 9/28/21 at 11:03 am to angryslugs
well we now know the play.
much rumor until now.
with emergency health order and now a move to deny the right to bear arms this can get ugly quick. without a doubt this is a totalitarian power play.
its frightening that the true colors of our administration is outright total control.
much rumor until now.
with emergency health order and now a move to deny the right to bear arms this can get ugly quick. without a doubt this is a totalitarian power play.
its frightening that the true colors of our administration is outright total control.
Posted on 9/28/21 at 11:10 am to Jrv2damac
quote:
without problems
Unless you have F-16s and nukes, any “problems” would be solved quickly by law enforcement or the military.
And don’t be so naive to think that they wouldn’t “follow orders.”
Posted on 9/28/21 at 11:12 am to Placekicker
They do that shite at a time where unarmed Australian citizens are getting their asses beat and hauled off by an authoritarian government.
Posted on 9/28/21 at 11:18 am to BobABooey
quote:
Unless you have F-16s and nukes, any “problems” would be solved quickly by law enforcement or the military.
The US would nuke itself? I don’t think even this administration is that stupid.
quote:
And don’t be so naive to think that they wouldn’t “follow orders.”
Ok.
Posted on 9/28/21 at 11:20 am to Placekicker
Are they suggesting the constitution is unconstitutional?
Posted on 9/28/21 at 11:20 am to BobABooey
quote:
Unless you have F-16s and nukes, any “problems” would be solved quickly by law enforcement or the military.
How many did the taliban have?
I'll do just fine with my F-150
Page 1 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News