re: Attempted home invasion in CA.

The bots on these threads are easy to discern. The algorithms follow an elementary programming. Watch....

Sixthandbarone you are a jackass, the algorithm picked it up....Watch...

quote:

---

This would never happen in a Red State like Louisiana

---

It most definitely would happen in a red state like Louisiana- especially in cities like New Orleans, Baton Rouge, and Shreveport.

Many years ago but while stationed in Bossier City Shreveport had more off limits locations than I ever saw at any other duty stations.

"Leave it unlocked, go upstairs and cover your ears, sweetie."

quote:

---

The bots on these threads are easy to discern. The algorithms follow an elementary programming. Watch....

Sixthandbarone you are a jackass, the algorithm picked it up....Watch..

---

Told you, watch again..... this algorithm named sixhandbarone is just a knucklehead.

If the algorithm picks it up, it will no doubt be some personal attack towards the poster.....wait for it, wait for it

quote:

---

Four armed thugs robbing someone isn’t political, jackass. That’s what thugs do and every state has thugs.

---

I don't understand these "don't talk about it" posts.

Call an ambulance they'rd be 4 dead bodies laid out on my lawn... gimme a reason thugs!!!

quote:

---

Four armed thugs robbing someone isn’t political, jackass. That’s what thugs do and every state has thugs.

---

It's true this happens in every state. However, there are some key differences. I say this as someone who has lived in California myself for a decade, but now lives in Florida.

In Florida, people are encouraged to shoot these people. My local sheriff will tell you to shoot them and get them off the streets please. We have laws that protect the people who defend themselves this way. We have constitutional carry laws which increases the likelihood any home you enter is armed. So even if you don't have a gun yourself, you're protected by the chance you could be.

In California, you are not encouraged to shoot these people, you are encouraged to appease them. If you shoot back and they aren't like actively in the process of trying to kill you, then you could be held on charges yourself. They do not have laws that defend people who defend their property, and they do not have laws that make it likely someone is armed.

I think the distinct differences here are 100% political.

quote:

---

It absolutely is because they all vote Democrat and thr democrats are trying to eliminate consequences for crimes.

---

We most certainly do not all vote for the dems and you should probably read up on our 10-20-Life law aka “Use a gun and you’re done”.

Here’s a breakdown of what we’re allowed by law to do regarding self defense:

quote:

---

For any self-defense claim in California to be valid, three elements must be present. First, you must have a reasonable belief that you or another person are in imminent danger of suffering harm. This belief does not have to be perfectly accurate, but it must be a conclusion that an average person in the same situation would have reached based on the circumstances as they appeared to you. The second element is that the danger must be imminent, meaning it is immediate and present. The threat must be happening or about to happen, not something that might occur in the future or that has already passed. For example, a threat to harm you next week would not justify the immediate use of force, as the law addresses dangers that require instant action. Finally, the force used must be proportional to the threat. This means you can only use the amount of force reasonably necessary to stop the danger. If someone shoves you, responding with deadly force would be considered excessive, as proportionality is a factor in determining if the act was justified.

---