Started By
Message
locked post

Are you for or against the death penalty?

Posted on 10/17/19 at 8:56 pm
Posted by tuptiger
Member since Jan 2008
4314 posts
Posted on 10/17/19 at 8:56 pm
It seems like the deterrence argument might carry some merit. The automatic appeals, though, to the Supreme Court seems to be costly.

I understand the history of an individual sentenced to death is under intense scrutiny. Reading levels, etc are generally factored in.

There’s been a renewed emphasis on protecting policemen in most states.

What do you say? I guess in extreme instances I’m pro-death penalty. What’s defined as “extreme”? Who knows. I’d say OKC, for instance, might be an act I’d deem fitting within my framework for the death penalty. That ones probably obvious, but it would help define the working parameters I would reference in support of the death penalty.
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
98249 posts
Posted on 10/17/19 at 8:56 pm to
For

Swift and public
Posted by Ollieoxenfree99
Member since Aug 2018
7748 posts
Posted on 10/17/19 at 8:56 pm to
For. Kill em all. Let God sort em out.
Posted by Darth_Vader
A galaxy far, far away
Member since Dec 2011
64295 posts
Posted on 10/17/19 at 8:57 pm to
For. Immediately, as in gallows built on the town square outside the courthouse, immediately.
Posted by Damone
FoCo
Member since Aug 2016
32378 posts
Posted on 10/17/19 at 8:57 pm to
Against. The criminal justice system is not reliable enough to entrust with the power of directly ending lives.
Posted by papasmurf1269
Hells Pass
Member since Apr 2005
20875 posts
Posted on 10/17/19 at 8:58 pm to
For
Posted by diremustang
Member since Oct 2017
2287 posts
Posted on 10/17/19 at 8:58 pm to
For, but in a more equal manner. A shitbag who can afford a competent lawyer should die same as as one who can't
Posted by geauxbrown
Louisiana
Member since Oct 2006
19337 posts
Posted on 10/17/19 at 8:58 pm to
For
Posted by tuptiger
Member since Jan 2008
4314 posts
Posted on 10/17/19 at 9:00 pm to
Well, the firing squad might be extreme. Smoking the last cigarette. Too archaic.
Posted by SCLibertarian
Conway, South Carolina
Member since Aug 2013
35891 posts
Posted on 10/17/19 at 9:01 pm to
Opposed. No faith in government or 12 jurors to always make the correct decision.
Posted by SSpaniel
Germantown
Member since Feb 2013
29658 posts
Posted on 10/17/19 at 9:01 pm to
Incontrovertible evidence that they are guilty? Kill 'em deader than dead. And don't dawdle.
Posted by goatmilker
Castle Anthrax
Member since Feb 2009
64051 posts
Posted on 10/17/19 at 9:01 pm to
For States deciding of course.

And some cases are so horrific and such a slam dunk that those like Rader need to be put down.
Period.
Posted by bbeck
Member since Dec 2011
14549 posts
Posted on 10/17/19 at 9:01 pm to
For

Eye for an eye, at times

Wish it was public
Posted by timdonaghyswhistle
Member since Jul 2018
16259 posts
Posted on 10/17/19 at 9:01 pm to
For. Death row should never be over crowded.

One moves in, one bites the dust.
Posted by victoire sécurisé
Member since Nov 2012
4814 posts
Posted on 10/17/19 at 9:02 pm to
Against. Government shouldn’t be in charge of deciding when/how people die, with the exception of enemy combatants.

How many death penalties has the Innocence Project had overturned?
Posted by NYNolaguy1
Member since May 2011
20849 posts
Posted on 10/17/19 at 9:02 pm to
Against.

Better a guilty man walk then an innocent swing.

Besides, are you really sure that the government that has trouble with balancing a check book or taking out your trash can perfectly determine guilt, every time in a death penalty case?

Posted by SSpaniel
Germantown
Member since Feb 2013
29658 posts
Posted on 10/17/19 at 9:02 pm to
quote:

Death row should never be over crowded.


As Ron White said, do what Texas did... put in an express lane.
Posted by coonasswhodat
Gonzales, Louisiana
Member since Dec 2013
4112 posts
Posted on 10/17/19 at 9:02 pm to
Pro life. Against.
Posted by DeusVultMachina
Member since Jul 2017
4245 posts
Posted on 10/17/19 at 9:03 pm to
quote:

For

Swift and public


This.
Posted by NYNolaguy1
Member since May 2011
20849 posts
Posted on 10/17/19 at 9:03 pm to
quote:

Incontrovertible evidence that they are guilty?


The problem is that every prosecutor will tell you they have this in every capital case. Otherwise they wouldnt be pressing the case, right?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram