- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Are Dems going to overlook Sen Harris being an opportunistic home wrecking tramp?
Posted on 1/30/19 at 8:45 am
Posted on 1/30/19 at 8:45 am
LINK
I thought you bozos were champions of women not being taken advantage of. I thought you clowns were against women being objectified as pieces of meat. It appears that the good Senator Kamala Harris had no issue at all spreading a little poon around to the Honorable Mr. Brown to get a few appointments to powerful positions out of the deal.
Is this who you want to be the face of the pussy hat brigade? Are you hypocrites going to give her a pass on "poon for appointments?"
Are we going to go after Mrs. Harris the way you did Trump for getting laid on the side?
An interesting note, when I used the G to look up "Kamala Harris affair," I had to get all the way to the third page before what you idiots call a "legitimate" news outlet covered one word on what should be a major story.
Please Progs, tell me where we stand on this issue. Are we demanding Congressional investigations and Special Counsel teams or not?
quote:
According to Brown in a recent op-ed, he appointed Harris to two high level positions during her early career. Once to the California Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board, and again to the California Medical Assistance Commission. Brown was also reportedly key to helping Harris gain the support of wealthy campaign donors during her run for San Francisco district attorney in the early 2000’s. When questions began to swirl over her impartiality, Harris has become keen to distance herself from the former mayor. With her sights now on the presidency, its left many wondering what kind of tactics she’ll employ during her campaign. In Willie Brown’s own words “that’s politics for ya.”
I thought you bozos were champions of women not being taken advantage of. I thought you clowns were against women being objectified as pieces of meat. It appears that the good Senator Kamala Harris had no issue at all spreading a little poon around to the Honorable Mr. Brown to get a few appointments to powerful positions out of the deal.
Is this who you want to be the face of the pussy hat brigade? Are you hypocrites going to give her a pass on "poon for appointments?"
Are we going to go after Mrs. Harris the way you did Trump for getting laid on the side?
An interesting note, when I used the G to look up "Kamala Harris affair," I had to get all the way to the third page before what you idiots call a "legitimate" news outlet covered one word on what should be a major story.
Please Progs, tell me where we stand on this issue. Are we demanding Congressional investigations and Special Counsel teams or not?
11
Posted on 1/30/19 at 8:50 am to bamarep
Harris is a slap in the face to the #metoo movement. She legitimized a predator by allowing herself to be used. What were her thoughts on Weinstein?
Hypocrite much?
quote:
Harris divested of disgraced Hollywood producer Harvey Weinstein’s $2,500 to her attorney general campaign and another $2,500 to her U.S. Senate campaign once his years of alleged sexual abuse and harassment of women surfaced. She donated the money to Equal Rights Advocates, a California-based women’s rights nonprofit.
Hypocrite much?
Posted on 1/30/19 at 8:50 am to bamarep
Sure. They love Stormy Daniels.
Posted on 1/30/19 at 8:50 am to bamarep
quote:
With her sights now on the presidency, its left many wondering what kind of tactics she’ll employ during her campaign.
Her slogan can be "I'll blow you for your vote"
Posted on 1/30/19 at 8:57 am to bamarep
Wouldn't be the first time. See:
Clinton, William Jefferson.
Clinton, William Jefferson.
Posted on 1/30/19 at 8:58 am to bamarep
She and Willie were swingers back then. Can't wait to hear what Trump has to say about that.
Posted on 1/30/19 at 9:13 am to bamarep
So far, two of the Dems 2020 candidates (Gillibrand and Harris) fricked their way to the top.
Posted on 1/30/19 at 9:14 am to bamarep
Dems will perform the same type of mental gymnastics as Reps.
Posted on 1/30/19 at 9:15 am to bamarep
This is a pretty lame line of attack. We nominated Trump for frick's sake.
Posted on 1/30/19 at 9:17 am to skullhawk
quote:
Gillibrand
I'll never tire of laughing at how Trump described her wanting his donations
Posted on 1/30/19 at 9:18 am to bamarep
quote:
ZOMG, slut shaming! REEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!
Posted on 1/30/19 at 9:23 am to NIH
She did it for political power
Trump didnt
Trump didnt
Posted on 1/30/19 at 9:24 am to bamarep
quote:
Are Dems going to overlook Sen Harris being an opportunistic home wrecking tramp?
Not only will they not talk about it, they are going to ignore her awful personality and lack of coherent policy platform as well.
She checks their demographic boxes, and that is about 80% of what matters to the DNC. Electability, popularity, and policy are just gravy. Identity politics is king
Posted on 1/30/19 at 9:26 am to LosLobos111
quote:
She did it for political power
Trump didnt
That doesn't make him any better. He's cheated on every wife that he's had.
Posted on 1/30/19 at 9:27 am to Indefatigable
She will never appeal to the average American
Barry could at least put up a front and was likeable to the above
It will never work
Barry could at least put up a front and was likeable to the above
It will never work
Posted on 1/30/19 at 9:31 am to NIH
quote:
This is a pretty lame line of attack. We nominated Trump for frick's sake.
Good point, however we aren't the ones running around screaming #metoo.
We openly acknowledged Trump's history, not ignored it. That's the difference.
This post was edited on 1/30/19 at 9:36 am
Posted on 1/30/19 at 9:32 am to bamarep
yes
Posted on 1/30/19 at 9:34 am to NIH
quote:
This is a pretty lame line of attack. We nominated Trump for frick's sake
True, but we aren't insufferable doosh-bags who championed the #Metoo movement and spend every waking moment pushing "girl-pwer" down peoples' throats.
Posted on 1/30/19 at 9:43 am to LosLobos111
quote:
She will never appeal to the average American
Barry could at least put up a front and was likeable to the above
This is my prediction as well. She will probably be a force in the Dem primary as it makes its way through the South (black vote), but she will not be someone the average person would want to have a beer with. Over the last 7 Presidential Elections, the more likable candidate won.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News